CHRW vs FLX vs GXO Stock Comparison

C. H. Robinson Worldwide, BingEx and GXO Logistics Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FLX BingEx Ltd
$1.47 -7.5% 1M -60.5% 1Y
Market cap
$102.16M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$558.59M
Div. yield
–
Logistics Industrials
2 wins
GXO GXO Logistics, Inc.
$49.91 +11.5% 1M -7.6% 1Y
Market cap
$5.75B
P/E
43.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$13.64B
Div. yield
–
Logistics Industrials
2 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

C. H. Robinson Worldwide leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (C. H. Robinson Worldwide 5, BingEx 2, GXO Logistics 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCHRWFLXGXOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $14.66B $102.16M $5.75B CHRW
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 21.9x -55.6x 43.9x CHRW
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 20.8x 3.4x 16.1x FLX
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +10.4% -3.8% +7.6% CHRW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — -0.3% 1.0% GXO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 3.3% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 3.1x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -1.5% -60.5% -7.6% CHRW
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +5.6%/yr — -10.9%/yr CHRW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 48.4% 99.3% 40.7% GXO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 36/100 59/100 36/100 FLX

Percentile Scorecard

CHRWFLXGXO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCHRWFLXGXO
Valuation 27 #100 of 136 69 #43 of 136 38 #85 of 136
Growth 53 #58 of 121 56 #54 of 121 75 #31 of 121
Profitability 41 #66 of 112 25 #84 of 112 29 #80 of 112
Financial Health 22 #110 of 140 86 #20 of 140 20 #112 of 140
Shareholder Returns 35 #52 of 80 – 20 #64 of 80
Overall 36 59 36
  • CHRW ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • FLX ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • GXO ranked among 150 companies in Transportation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCHRWFLXGXOSPY
1 month -14.9%-7.5%+11.5% +0.7%
3 months -13.3%-31.9%-1.1% +3.7%
6 months -29.9%-46.9%-12.6% +7.1%
Year to date -20.7%-53.8%-5.2% +12.8%
1 year -1.5%-60.5%-7.6% +11.9%
3 years +58.1%—-1.1% +85.2%
3 years, per year +16.5%—-0.4% +22.8%
5 years +31.4%—-43.8% +67.6%
5 years, per year +5.6%—-10.9% +10.9%
10 years +88.5%—— +262.0%
10 years, per year +6.5%—— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCHRWFLXGXOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 48.4%99.3%40.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 53.1%114.3%44.3% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.550.981.50 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.03-0.61-0.19 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -43.2%-95.6%-69.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -39.2%-64.7%-23.9% -1.2%
52-week high $209.42$4.16$65.59 $779.14
52-week low $127.43$0.80$44.15 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCHRWFLXGXO
P/E now vs peer median 22.6xmedian 16.5x -55.3xmedian 16.5x 43.8xmedian 16.5x
P/S now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 0.9x 0.2xmedian 0.9x 0.4xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 8.8x —median 8.8x 10.2xmedian 8.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 26.2xmedian 11.9x —median 11.9x 31.8xmedian 11.9x
P/B now vs peer median 9.4xmedian 1.2x 1.0xmedian 1.2x 1.9xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 1.15median 0.84 —median 0.84 -3.62median 0.84

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCHRWFLXGXO
Revenue $18.22B $558.59M $13.64B
Gross profit – $60.56M $2.08B
Operating income $884.59M $5.06M $328.00M
Net income $668.81M -$1.71M $139.00M
Free cash flow – – $180.00M
R&D – $9.48M –
EPS (diluted) $5.58 $-0.03 $1.13
Cash & equivalents $193.13M $84.66M $769.00M
Total debt – – $3.20B
Shares (diluted) 119.75M 69.52M 115.72M
Enterprise value $14.66B -$282.75M $3.00B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCHRWFLXGXO
P/E 22.6x -55.3x 43.8x
P/FCF 26.2x – 31.8x
P/Operating cash flow 27.9x – 11.3x
P/S 0.8x 0.2x 0.4x
P/B 9.4x 1.0x 1.9x
P/Tangible book 9.4x 1.0x 2.6x
EV/EBITDA – – 10.2x
EV/EBIT – -3.6x 24.9x
EV/Revenue 0.8x 0.0x 0.6x
EV/FCF – – 45.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 27.9x – 16.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.15 – -3.62

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCHRWFLXGXO
Revenue growth (1Y) 10.4% -3.8% 7.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -0.4% – 12.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – -10.0% 9.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 7.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) 10.9% 149.3% 52.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 15.7% – 4.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 11.5% 94.4% 107.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 19.7% – -11.7%
EPS growth (1Y) 12.9% 96.5% 106.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 19.7% – -12.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -39.1% – 22.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -28.5% – 4.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – 93.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 20.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCHRWFLXGXO
Gross margin – 10.8% 15.3%
EBITDA margin – – 5.9%
Operating margin – 0.9% 2.4%
Pretax margin – -0.3% 1.6%
Net margin – -0.3% 1.0%
FCF margin – – 1.3%
Operating cash flow margin 2.9% – 3.7%
Return on equity – -1.5% 4.5%
Return on assets – -1.0% 1.1%
Return on invested capital – – 3.3%
Return on capital employed – 4.5% 4.0%
Asset turnover 3.0x 3.3x 1.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.8x – 3.7x
Stock comp / revenue 0.5% – 0.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCHRWFLXGXO
Debt / assets – – 25.9%
Debt / equity – – 1.1x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 3.1x
Debt / FCF – – 17.8x
Liabilities / assets 75.3% 35.0% 75.6%
Equity / assets 24.7% 65.0% 24.4%
Interest coverage – – 2.5x
Current ratio 1.3x 2.4x 0.8x
Quick ratio – 2.3x 0.7x
Cash ratio – 2.2x 0.2x
Altman Z-score – – 1.56

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCHRWFLXGXO
Dividend yield 2.0% – –
Net buyback yield – – 0.2%
Shareholder yield 2.0% – 0.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCHRWFLXGXO
Forward P/E 20.8xFY2026 3.4xFY2026 16.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $6.12FY2026 $0.43FY2026 $3.10FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +20.2%FY2026 +514.3%FY2026 +23.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +19.0% +7.0% +9.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $18.98BFY2026 $648.80MFY2026 $13.03BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +16.9%FY2026 +13.7%FY2026 -1.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +1.5% +2.6% +17.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCHRWFLXGXO
Held by institutions 100.0% – 100.0%
Institutions holding 892 – 480
Change in shares held, QoQ -1.7% – +5.8%
Institutions buying 445 – 237
Institutions selling 319 – 153
Buyers to sellers 1.39 – 1.55

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CHRWFLXGXO
CHRW 1.00 -0.02 0.36
FLX -0.02 1.00 0.07
GXO 0.36 0.07 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CHRW, FLX and GXO?

C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) is the largest by market capitalisation: C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) $14.66B, BingEx (FLX) $102.16M, GXO Logistics (GXO) $5.75B.

Which stock is cheaper, CHRW, FLX and GXO?

C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) 21.9x, BingEx (FLX) -55.6x, GXO Logistics (GXO) 43.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, BingEx (FLX) is cheapest (C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) 20.8x, BingEx (FLX) 3.4x, GXO Logistics (GXO) 16.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) +10.4%, BingEx (FLX) -3.8%, GXO Logistics (GXO) +7.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

GXO Logistics (GXO) has the highest net margin (BingEx (FLX) -0.3%, GXO Logistics (GXO) 1.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) returned the most: C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) -1.5%, BingEx (FLX) -60.5%, GXO Logistics (GXO) -7.6%. Over five years, C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) compounded fastest (C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) +5.6%/yr, GXO Logistics (GXO) -10.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, GXO Logistics (GXO) has been the steadiest (C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) 48.4%, BingEx (FLX) 99.3%, GXO Logistics (GXO) 40.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CHRW, FLX and GXO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.