CHRW vs CPRT vs OZVN Stock Comparison

C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Copart and Oz Vision Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CPRT Copart Inc
$29.55 +8.9% 1M -30.5% 1Y
Market cap
$28.70B
P/E
19.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.67B
Div. yield
–
Logistics Industrials
6 wins
OZVN Oz Vision Inc.
$2.50 0.0% 1M +138.1% 1Y
Market cap
$73.43M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$46.93K
Div. yield
–
Logistics Industrials
1 win

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Copart leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Copart 6, C. H. Robinson Worldwide 2, Oz Vision 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCHRWCPRTOZVNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $14.66B $28.70B $73.43M CPRT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 21.9x 19.3x -1,252x CPRT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 20.8x 17.8x — CPRT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +10.4% +0.4% -13.5% CHRW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 31.8% -125.0% CPRT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -1.5% -30.5% +138.1% OZVN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +5.6%/yr -5.3%/yr -13.0%/yr CHRW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 48.4% 32.7% 74.5% CPRT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 36/100 66/100 26/100 CPRT

Percentile Scorecard

CHRWCPRTOZVN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCHRWCPRTOZVN
Valuation 27 #100 of 136 25 #102 of 136 2 #134 of 136
Growth 53 #58 of 121 48 #64 of 121 39 #74 of 121
Profitability 41 #66 of 112 76 #28 of 112 11 #100 of 112
Financial Health 22 #110 of 140 94 #9 of 140 52 #68 of 140
Shareholder Returns 35 #52 of 80 86 #12 of 80 –
Overall 36 66 26
  • CHRW ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • CPRT ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • OZVN ranked among 150 companies in Transportation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCHRWCPRTOZVNSPY
1 month -14.9%+8.9%0.0% +0.7%
3 months -13.3%-0.1%0.0% +3.7%
6 months -29.9%-10.8%0.0% +7.1%
Year to date -20.7%-24.5%+127.3% +12.8%
1 year -1.5%-30.5%+138.1% +11.9%
3 years +58.1%-31.5%+65.6% +85.2%
3 years, per year +16.5%-11.8%+18.3% +22.8%
5 years +31.4%-23.9%-50.0% +67.6%
5 years, per year +5.6%-5.3%-13.0% +10.9%
10 years +88.5%+349.9%— +262.0%
10 years, per year +6.5%+16.2%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCHRWCPRTOZVNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 48.4%32.7%74.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 53.1%33.2%— 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.550.06-0.54 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.03-0.931.85 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -43.2%-58.9%-90.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -39.2%-31.3%0.0% -1.2%
52-week high $209.42$43.01$2.50 $779.14
52-week low $127.43$26.27$1.05 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCHRWCPRTOZVN
P/E now vs peer median 22.6xmedian 16.5x 18.9xmedian 16.5x -1,252xmedian 16.5x
P/S now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 0.9x 5.9xmedian 0.9x 1,565xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 8.8x 13.5xmedian 8.8x —median 8.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 26.2xmedian 11.9x 21.6xmedian 11.9x 16,939xmedian 11.9x
P/B now vs peer median 9.4xmedian 1.2x 3.0xmedian 1.2x 5.9xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 1.15median 0.84 2.86median 0.84 19.72median 0.84

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCHRWCPRTOZVN
Revenue $18.22B $4.67B $46.93K
Gross profit – $2.70B $13.08K
Operating income $884.59M $1.65B -$58.67K
Net income $668.81M $1.48B -$58.67K
Free cash flow – $1.27B $4.34K
EPS (diluted) $5.58 $1.55 $0.00
Cash & equivalents $193.13M $1.91B $4.39K
Total debt – – $376.49K
Shares (diluted) 119.75M 956.86M 29.37M
Enterprise value $14.66B $13.10B $73.41M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCHRWCPRTOZVN
P/E 22.6x 18.9x -1,252x
P/FCF 26.2x 21.6x 16,939x
P/Operating cash flow 27.9x 17.1x 16,939x
P/S 0.8x 5.9x 1,565x
P/B 9.4x 3.0x 5.9x
P/Tangible book 9.4x 3.0x -124.5x
EV/EBITDA – 13.5x –
EV/EBIT – 15.4x -1,254x
EV/Revenue 0.8x 5.5x 1,568x
EV/FCF – 20.1x 16,976x
EV/Operating cash flow 27.9x 15.9x 16,976x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.15 2.86 19.72

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCHRWCPRTOZVN
Revenue growth (1Y) 10.4% 0.4% -13.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -0.4% 6.4% -56.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – -0.1% 2,944%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 4.7% -22.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) 10.9% -2.6% 10.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 15.7% 3.6% -101.9%
Net income growth (1Y) 11.5% -4.4% 10.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 19.7% 6.1% -101.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 12.9% -2.3% 10.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 19.7% 6.6% -63.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -39.1% -10.8% 127.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -28.5% 5.6% 37.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 3.0% 127.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 14.3% 37.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCHRWCPRTOZVN
Gross margin – 57.9% 27.9%
EBITDA margin – 40.5% –
Operating margin – 35.4% -125.0%
Pretax margin – 39.3% -125.0%
Net margin – 31.8% -125.0%
FCF margin – 27.2% 9.2%
Operating cash flow margin 2.9% 34.4% 9.2%
Return on equity – 16.6% -0.5%
Return on assets – 15.0% -0.4%
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed – 18.1% -0.5%
Asset turnover 3.0x 0.5x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.8x 1.1x -0.1x
Stock comp / revenue 0.5% 0.8% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCHRWCPRTOZVN
Debt / assets – – 1.2%
Debt / equity – – 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – 37.3x
Liabilities / assets 75.3% 9.3% 8.8%
Equity / assets 24.7% 90.7% 91.2%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 1.3x 7.9x 0.0x
Quick ratio – 3.9x 0.0x
Cash ratio – 2.7x 0.0x
Altman Z-score – 20.36 36.19

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCHRWCPRTOZVN
Dividend yield 2.0% – –
Net buyback yield – 5.1% –
Shareholder yield 2.0% 5.1% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCHRWCPRTOZVN
Forward P/E 20.8xFY2026 17.8xFY2027 –
EPS, next fiscal year $6.12FY2026 $1.66FY2027 –
EPS growth, next FY +20.2%FY2026 +7.1%FY2027 –
EPS growth, the year after +19.0% +3.0% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $18.98BFY2026 $4.64BFY2027 –
Revenue growth, next FY +16.9%FY2026 -0.6%FY2027 –
Revenue growth, the year after +1.5% +12.8% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCHRWCPRTOZVN
Held by institutions 100.0% 83.8% –
Institutions holding 892 1,059 –
Change in shares held, QoQ -1.7% +5.7% –
Institutions buying 445 530 –
Institutions selling 319 396 –
Buyers to sellers 1.39 1.34 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CHRWCPRTOZVN
CHRW 1.00 0.17 0.07
CPRT 0.17 1.00 0.02
OZVN 0.07 0.02 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CHRW, CPRT and OZVN?

Copart (CPRT) is the largest by market capitalisation: C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) $14.66B, Copart (CPRT) $28.70B, Oz Vision (OZVN) $73.43M.

Which stock is cheaper, CHRW, CPRT and OZVN?

Copart (CPRT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) 21.9x, Copart (CPRT) 19.3x, Oz Vision (OZVN) -1,252x). On next year's consensus earnings, Copart (CPRT) is cheapest (C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) 20.8x, Copart (CPRT) 17.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) +10.4%, Copart (CPRT) +0.4%, Oz Vision (OZVN) -13.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Copart (CPRT) has the highest net margin (Copart (CPRT) 31.8%, Oz Vision (OZVN) -125.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Oz Vision (OZVN) returned the most: C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) -1.5%, Copart (CPRT) -30.5%, Oz Vision (OZVN) +138.1%. Over five years, C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) compounded fastest (C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) +5.6%/yr, Copart (CPRT) -5.3%/yr, Oz Vision (OZVN) -13.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Copart (CPRT) has been the steadiest (C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) 48.4%, Copart (CPRT) 32.7%, Oz Vision (OZVN) 74.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CHRW, CPRT and OZVN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Copart (CPRT) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.