CHPT vs WBX vs BEEM Stock Comparison

ChargePoint Holdings, Wallbox and Beam Global Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
WBX Wallbox N.V.
$2.70 -4.6% 1M -45.5% 1Y
Market cap
$419.19M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
EV Charging Industrials
2 wins
BEEM Beam Global
$0.91 -23.5% 1M -69.8% 1Y
Market cap
$19.60M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$26.53M
Div. yield
–
EV Charging Industrials
1 win

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

ChargePoint Holdings leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (ChargePoint Holdings 5, Wallbox 2, Beam Global 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCHPTWBXBEEMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $231.24M $419.19M $19.60M WBX
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -1.3x — -1.1x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +8.8% — -20.5% CHPT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -40.6% — -64.5% CHPT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -82.8% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.9x — 0.1x CHPT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -25.0% -45.5% -69.8% CHPT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -55.2%/yr -28.6%/yr -49.5%/yr WBX
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 95.0% 86.9% 78.9% BEEM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 42/100 — 29/100 CHPT

Percentile Scorecard

CHPTWBXBEEM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCHPTWBXBEEM
Valuation 30 #43 of 61 – 25 #46 of 61
Growth 77 #14 of 58 – 25 #44 of 58
Profitability 43 #32 of 55 – 32 #38 of 55
Financial Health 13 #62 of 71 7 #66 of 71 39 #44 of 71
Shareholder Returns 46 #16 of 29 – 25 #22 of 29
Overall 42 – 29
  • CHPT ranked among 71 companies in Clean Energy Equipment
  • WBX ranked among 71 companies in Clean Energy Equipment
  • BEEM ranked among 71 companies in Clean Energy Equipment

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCHPTWBXBEEMSPY
1 month -7.7%-4.6%-23.5% -0.8%
3 months +52.5%-28.9%-13.3% +3.5%
6 months +21.5%-15.6%-51.1% +7.0%
Year to date +24.2%+15.4%-39.3% +12.2%
1 year -25.0%-45.5%-69.8% +13.0%
3 years -83.4%+57.0%-83.5% +86.3%
3 years, per year -45.1%+16.2%-45.2% +23.1%
5 years -98.2%-81.5%-96.7% +68.6%
5 years, per year -55.2%-28.6%-49.5% +11.0%
10 years ——-89.0% +258.0%
10 years, per year ——-19.8% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureCHPTWBXBEEMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 95.0%86.9%78.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 75.0%73.6%78.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.051.382.60 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.26-0.52-0.88 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -99.2%-98.5%-97.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -25.1%-51.5%-68.5% -1.8%
52-week high $11.02$5.57$2.89 $779.14
52-week low $4.51$2.34$0.87 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCHPTWBXBEEM
P/E now vs peer median -1.2xmedian 25.4x —median 25.4x -1.2xmedian 25.4x
P/S now vs peer median 0.5xmedian 2.1x —median 2.1x 0.8xmedian 2.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -2.4xmedian 17.5x —median 17.5x -1.4xmedian 17.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median -3.2xmedian 27.3x —median 27.3x -1.6xmedian 27.3x
P/B now vs peer median -6.1xmedian 1.7x -6.1xmedian 1.7x 1.0xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median -0.04median 0.77 —median 0.77 0.03median 0.77

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCHPTWBXBEEM
Revenue $432.89M – $26.53M
Gross profit $138.81M – $2.70M
Operating income -$178.53M – -$17.23M
Net income -$175.73M – -$17.11M
Free cash flow -$68.43M – -$12.98M
R&D $137.29M – –
EPS (diluted) $-6.68 – $-0.97
Cash & equivalents $95.33M $22.78M $1.03M
Total debt $236.94M $238.51M $165.00K
Shares (diluted) 26.32M 444.00K 17.69M
Enterprise value -$281.95M $293.32M $12.26M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCHPTWBXBEEM
P/E -1.2x – -1.2x
P/FCF -3.2x – -1.6x
P/Operating cash flow -3.4x – -1.5x
P/S 0.5x – 0.8x
P/B -6.1x -6.1x 1.0x
P/Tangible book -2.5x -3.6x 1.5x
EV/EBITDA -2.4x – -1.4x
EV/EBIT -2.0x – -1.1x
EV/Revenue 0.8x – 0.7x
EV/FCF -5.3x – -1.5x
EV/Operating cash flow -5.6x – -1.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.04 – 0.03

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCHPTWBXBEEM
Revenue growth (1Y) 8.8% – -20.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -8.2% – -16.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 26.0% – -50.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 16.7% – 92.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) 24.3% – 27.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 21.2% – 7.8%
Net income growth (1Y) 32.3% – 25.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 21.8% – -39.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 40.4% – 35.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 31.4% – -35.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 10.8% – -214.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 41.6% – 5.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 13.9% – -132.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 41.6% – 8.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCHPTWBXBEEM
Gross margin 32.1% – 10.2%
EBITDA margin -34.6% – -51.9%
Operating margin -41.2% – -64.9%
Pretax margin -39.4% – -64.9%
Net margin -40.6% – -64.5%
FCF margin -15.8% – -48.9%
Operating cash flow margin -14.9% – -49.8%
Return on equity – – -82.4%
Return on assets -24.8% – -44.1%
Return on invested capital -82.8% – –
Return on capital employed -51.2% – -64.0%
Asset turnover 0.6x – 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.4x – 0.8x
Stock comp / revenue 11.6% – 5.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCHPTWBXBEEM
Debt / assets 34.1% 86.2% 0.4%
Debt / equity -6.6x -3.5x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.9x – 0.1x
Debt / FCF -3.5x – 0.0x
Liabilities / assets 105.2% 124.6% 46.9%
Equity / assets -5.2% -24.6% 53.1%
Interest coverage -16.0x – -861.4x
Current ratio 1.1x 1.0x 1.5x
Quick ratio 0.5x 0.5x 0.6x
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.2x 0.1x
Altman Z-score -4.41 – -5.14

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCHPTWBXBEEM
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -0.5% – -15.0%
Shareholder yield -0.5% – -15.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCHPTWBXBEEM
EPS, next fiscal year $-5.07FY2026 $-3.38FY2026 $-0.72FY2026
Revenue, next fiscal year $461.54MFY2026 $160.28MFY2026 $27.60MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +12.2%FY2026 -6.0%FY2026 -2.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +3.7% +149.9% +23.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCHPTWBXBEEM
Held by institutions 32.2% – 9.8%
Institutions holding 165 – 50
Change in shares held, QoQ +81.9% – -14.9%
Institutions buying 79 – 26
Institutions selling 26 – 9
Buyers to sellers 3.04 – 2.89

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CHPTWBXBEEM
CHPT 1.00 0.17 0.33
WBX 0.17 1.00 0.17
BEEM 0.33 0.17 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CHPT, WBX and BEEM?

Wallbox (WBX) is the largest by market capitalisation: ChargePoint Holdings (CHPT) $231.24M, Wallbox (WBX) $419.19M, Beam Global (BEEM) $19.60M.

Which company is growing faster?

ChargePoint Holdings (CHPT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: ChargePoint Holdings (CHPT) +8.8%, Beam Global (BEEM) -20.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

ChargePoint Holdings (CHPT) has the highest net margin (ChargePoint Holdings (CHPT) -40.6%, Beam Global (BEEM) -64.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year ChargePoint Holdings (CHPT) returned the most: ChargePoint Holdings (CHPT) -25.0%, Wallbox (WBX) -45.5%, Beam Global (BEEM) -69.8%. Over five years, Wallbox (WBX) compounded fastest (ChargePoint Holdings (CHPT) -55.2%/yr, Wallbox (WBX) -28.6%/yr, Beam Global (BEEM) -49.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Beam Global (BEEM) has been the steadiest (ChargePoint Holdings (CHPT) 95.0%, Wallbox (WBX) 86.9%, Beam Global (BEEM) 78.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CHPT, WBX and BEEM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, ChargePoint Holdings (CHPT) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.