CHPT vs AETN vs VFS Stock Comparison

ChargePoint Holdings, Aeternum Health and VinFast Auto Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
AETN Aeternum Health, Inc.
$2.04 +1,260.0% 1M +5,000.0% 1Y
Market cap
$107.74M
P/E
82.9x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
EV Charging Industrials
2 wins
VFS VinFast Auto Ltd.
$3.15 -0.9% 1M -3.7% 1Y
Market cap
$7.37B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3,514.06T
Div. yield
–
Auto Manufacturers Consumer Discretionary
3 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

VinFast Auto leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (VinFast Auto 3, ChargePoint Holdings 3, Aeternum Health 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCHPTAETNVFSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $234.94M $107.74M $7.37B VFS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -1.3x 82.9x 0.0x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +8.8% — +4,424.0% VFS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -40.6% — -69.2% CHPT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -82.8% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.9x — -0.5x CHPT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -20.6% +5,000.0% -3.7% AETN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -55.2%/yr +15.3%/yr -20.3%/yr AETN
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 95.0% 338.7% 41.4% VFS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 43/100 41/100 7/100 CHPT

Percentile Scorecard

CHPTAETNVFS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCHPTAETNVFS
Valuation 30 #43 of 61 85 #10 of 61 10 #45 of 50
Growth 81 #12 of 58 33 #39 of 58 2 #47 of 48
Profitability 43 #32 of 55 – 11 #41 of 46
Financial Health 13 #62 of 71 3 #69 of 71 4 #50 of 52
Shareholder Returns 48 #16 of 30 41 #18 of 30 –
Overall 43 41 7
  • CHPT ranked among 71 companies in Clean Energy Equipment
  • AETN ranked among 71 companies in Clean Energy Equipment
  • VFS ranked among 56 companies in Automobiles and Components

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCHPTAETNVFSSPY
1 month -2.1%+1,260.0%-0.9% -0.2%
3 months +63.9%+1,469.2%+6.1% +3.9%
6 months +31.4%+1,260.0%-22.4% +8.2%
Year to date +31.8%+6,700.0%-5.7% +12.9%
1 year -20.6%+5,000.0%-3.7% +12.3%
3 years -82.4%+1,940.0%-40.8% +87.4%
3 years, per year -44.0%+173.4%-16.0% +23.3%
5 years -98.2%+104.0%-67.8% +67.9%
5 years, per year -55.2%+15.3%-20.3% +10.9%
10 years —+308.0%— +261.1%
10 years, per year —+15.1%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCHPTAETNVFSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 95.0%338.7%41.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 75.0%302.7%39.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.072.770.80 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.2214.76-0.09 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -99.2%-99.0%-97.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -20.6%-32.0%-33.8% -1.2%
52-week high $11.02$3.00$4.76 $779.14
52-week low $4.51$0.01$2.81 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCHPTAETNVFS
P/E now vs peer median -1.3xmedian 27.2x 82.9xmedian 27.2x 0.0xmedian 19.4x
P/S now vs peer median 0.5xmedian 2.4x —median 2.4x 0.0xmedian 0.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -2.5xmedian 18.4x —median 18.4x -0.5xmedian 8.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median -3.4xmedian 28.6x -67.2xmedian 28.6x 0.0xmedian 9.4x
P/B now vs peer median -6.5xmedian 1.7x -315.8xmedian 1.7x 0.0xmedian 0.9x
PEG now vs peer median -0.04median 0.79 —median 0.79 —median 1.40

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCHPTAETNVFS
Revenue $432.89M – $3,514.06T
Gross profit $138.81M – -$1,799.20T
Operating income -$178.53M -$593.72K -$3,021.72T
Net income -$175.73M $1.35M -$3,525.77T
Free cash flow -$68.43M -$1.60M -$1,569.01T
R&D $137.29M – $376.86T
EPS (diluted) $-6.68 $0.02 $-1,039,497.78
Cash & equivalents $95.33M $702.81K $281.02T
Total debt $236.94M $5.74M $7,424.18T
Shares (diluted) 26.32M 54.67M 2.34B
Enterprise value -$278.25M $106.95M -$52.31T

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCHPTAETNVFS
P/E -1.3x 82.9x 0.0x
P/FCF -3.4x -67.2x 0.0x
P/Operating cash flow -3.6x -67.2x 0.0x
P/S 0.5x – 0.0x
P/B -6.5x -315.8x 0.0x
P/Tangible book -2.6x -302.5x 0.0x
EV/EBITDA -2.5x – -0.5x
EV/EBIT -2.1x -184.1x -0.1x
EV/Revenue 0.9x – 0.1x
EV/FCF -5.5x -68.2x -0.3x
EV/Operating cash flow -5.8x -68.2x -0.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.04 – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCHPTAETNVFS
Revenue growth (1Y) 8.8% – 4,424%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -8.2% – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 26.0% – -6,447%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 16.7% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 24.3% -98.9% -4,777%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 21.2% – –
Net income growth (1Y) 32.3% 525.2% -3,441%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 21.8% – –
EPS growth (1Y) 40.4% 482.6% -2,344%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 31.4% – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 10.8% -17,504% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 41.6% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 13.9% -17,504% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 41.6% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCHPTAETNVFS
Gross margin 32.1% – -51.2%
EBITDA margin -34.6% – -24.7%
Operating margin -41.2% – -86.0%
Pretax margin -39.4% – -102.7%
Net margin -40.6% – -69.2%
FCF margin -15.8% – -44.6%
Operating cash flow margin -14.9% – -50.4%
Return on equity – – –
Return on assets -24.8% 134.3% -47.1%
Return on invested capital -82.8% – –
Return on capital employed -51.2% – -208.1%
Asset turnover 0.6x – 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.4x -1.2x 0.5x
Stock comp / revenue 11.6% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCHPTAETNVFS
Debt / assets 34.1% 117.7% 29.1%
Debt / equity -6.6x -6.7x -0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.9x – -0.5x
Debt / FCF -3.5x -1.4x -0.6x
Liabilities / assets 105.2% 117.7% 256.0%
Equity / assets -5.2% -17.7% -156.0%
Interest coverage -16.0x – -5.7x
Current ratio 1.1x – 0.5x
Quick ratio 0.5x – 0.2x
Cash ratio 0.3x – 0.1x
Altman Z-score -4.39 – -10.29

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCHPTAETNVFS
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -0.4% -0.5% –
Shareholder yield -0.4% -0.5% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCHPTAETNVFS
EPS, next fiscal year $-5.07FY2026 – $-1.86FY2026
Revenue, next fiscal year $461.54MFY2026 – $5.02BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +12.2%FY2026 – +39.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +3.7% – +20.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCHPTAETNVFS
Held by institutions 32.2% – 0.2%
Institutions holding 165 – 32
Change in shares held, QoQ +81.9% – -8.3%
Institutions buying 79 – 20
Institutions selling 26 – 8
Buyers to sellers 3.04 – 2.50

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CHPTAETNVFS
CHPT 1.00 -0.07 0.10
AETN -0.07 1.00 0.02
VFS 0.10 0.02 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CHPT, AETN and VFS?

VinFast Auto (VFS) is the largest by market capitalisation: ChargePoint Holdings (CHPT) $234.94M, Aeternum Health (AETN) $107.74M, VinFast Auto (VFS) $7.37B.

Which company is growing faster?

VinFast Auto (VFS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: ChargePoint Holdings (CHPT) +8.8%, VinFast Auto (VFS) +4,424.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

ChargePoint Holdings (CHPT) has the highest net margin (ChargePoint Holdings (CHPT) -40.6%, VinFast Auto (VFS) -69.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Aeternum Health (AETN) returned the most: ChargePoint Holdings (CHPT) -20.6%, Aeternum Health (AETN) +5,000.0%, VinFast Auto (VFS) -3.7%. Over five years, Aeternum Health (AETN) compounded fastest (ChargePoint Holdings (CHPT) -55.2%/yr, Aeternum Health (AETN) +15.3%/yr, VinFast Auto (VFS) -20.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, VinFast Auto (VFS) has been the steadiest (ChargePoint Holdings (CHPT) 95.0%, Aeternum Health (AETN) 338.7%, VinFast Auto (VFS) 41.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CHPT, AETN and VFS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, VinFast Auto (VFS) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.