CHPT vs AETN vs ST Stock Comparison

ChargePoint Holdings, Aeternum Health and Sensata Technologies Holding Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
AETN Aeternum Health, Inc.
$2.08 +1,633.3% 1M +6,833.3% 1Y
Market cap
$109.86M
P/E
84.5x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
EV Charging Industrials
2 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Sensata Technologies Holding leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Sensata Technologies Holding 6, ChargePoint Holdings 2, Aeternum Health 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCHPTAETNSTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $231.24M $109.86M $6.14B ST
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -1.3x 84.5x 68.3x ST
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 11.3x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +8.8% — +0.8% CHPT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -40.6% — 2.4% ST
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -82.8% — 2.6% ST
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.9x — 3.8x CHPT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -25.0% +6,833.3% +27.6% AETN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -55.2%/yr +15.8%/yr -5.8%/yr AETN
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 95.0% 339.2% 39.7% ST
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 42/100 41/100 48/100 ST

Percentile Scorecard

CHPTAETNST

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCHPTAETNST
Valuation 30 #43 of 61 85 #10 of 61 77 #47 of 203
Growth 77 #14 of 58 35 #38 of 58 31 #130 of 187
Profitability 43 #32 of 55 – 47 #98 of 185
Financial Health 13 #62 of 71 3 #69 of 71 35 #142 of 219
Shareholder Returns 46 #16 of 29 43 #17 of 29 47 #81 of 153
Overall 42 41 48
  • CHPT ranked among 71 companies in Clean Energy Equipment
  • AETN ranked among 71 companies in Clean Energy Equipment
  • ST ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCHPTAETNSTSPY
1 month -7.7%+1,633.3%-3.6% -0.8%
3 months +52.5%+1,500.0%-12.3% +3.5%
6 months +21.5%+1,385.7%-3.7% +7.0%
Year to date +24.2%+6,833.3%+22.2% +12.2%
1 year -25.0%+6,833.3%+27.6% +13.0%
3 years -83.4%+2,500.0%+18.6% +86.3%
3 years, per year -45.1%+196.5%+5.9% +23.1%
5 years -98.2%+108.0%-25.7% +68.6%
5 years, per year -55.2%+15.8%-5.8% +11.0%
10 years —+593.3%+9.0% +258.0%
10 years, per year —+21.4%+0.9% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureCHPTAETNSTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 95.0%339.2%39.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 75.0%305.3%36.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.052.881.92 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.2620.150.70 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -99.2%-99.0%-72.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -25.1%-30.7%-24.0% -1.8%
52-week high $11.02$3.00$53.55 $779.14
52-week low $4.51$0.01$28.53 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCHPTAETNST
P/E now vs peer median -1.2xmedian 25.4x 84.5xmedian 25.4x 65.8xmedian 26.0x
P/S now vs peer median 0.5xmedian 2.1x —median 2.1x 1.6xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -2.4xmedian 17.5x —median 17.5x 15.0xmedian 14.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -3.2xmedian 27.3x -68.5xmedian 27.3x 10.2xmedian 21.4x
P/B now vs peer median -6.1xmedian 1.7x -321.9xmedian 1.7x 2.0xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median -0.04median 0.77 —median 0.77 -1.74median 1.26

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCHPTAETNST
Revenue $432.89M – $3.78B
Gross profit $138.81M – $1.11B
Operating income -$178.53M -$593.72K $284.24M
Net income -$175.73M $1.35M $89.91M
Free cash flow -$68.43M -$1.60M $579.20M
R&D $137.29M – $128.20M
EPS (diluted) $-6.68 $0.02 $0.61
Cash & equivalents $95.33M $702.81K $403.30M
Total debt $236.94M $5.74M $11.62B
Shares (diluted) 26.32M 54.67M 146.70M
Enterprise value -$281.95M $109.06M $3.74B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCHPTAETNST
P/E -1.2x 84.5x 65.8x
P/FCF -3.2x -68.5x 10.2x
P/Operating cash flow -3.4x -68.5x 8.5x
P/S 0.5x – 1.6x
P/B -6.1x -321.9x 2.0x
P/Tangible book -2.5x -308.4x 2.3x
EV/EBITDA -2.4x – 15.0x
EV/EBIT -2.0x -187.7x 28.0x
EV/Revenue 0.8x – 2.1x
EV/FCF -5.3x -69.5x 13.7x
EV/Operating cash flow -5.6x -69.5x 11.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.04 – -1.74

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCHPTAETNST
Revenue growth (1Y) 8.8% – 0.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -8.2% – -2.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 26.0% – 2.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 16.7% – -5.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) 24.3% -98.9% 110.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 21.2% – -24.9%
Net income growth (1Y) 32.3% 525.2% -19.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 21.8% – -38.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 40.4% 482.6% -19.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 31.4% – -37.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 10.8% -17,504% 23.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 41.6% – 9.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 13.9% -17,504% 34.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 41.6% – 16.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCHPTAETNST
Gross margin 32.1% – 29.5%
EBITDA margin -34.6% – 14.0%
Operating margin -41.2% – 7.5%
Pretax margin -39.4% – 4.6%
Net margin -40.6% – 2.4%
FCF margin -15.8% – 15.3%
Operating cash flow margin -14.9% – 18.4%
Return on equity – – 3.1%
Return on assets -24.8% 134.3% 1.3%
Return on invested capital -82.8% – 2.6%
Return on capital employed -51.2% – 4.8%
Asset turnover 0.6x – 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.4x -1.2x 7.7x
Stock comp / revenue 11.6% – 0.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCHPTAETNST
Debt / assets 34.1% 117.7% 36.9%
Debt / equity -6.6x -6.7x 0.8x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.9x – 3.8x
Debt / FCF -3.5x -1.4x 4.2x
Liabilities / assets 105.2% 117.7% 55.1%
Equity / assets -5.2% -17.7% 44.9%
Interest coverage -16.0x – 2.0x
Current ratio 1.1x – 2.3x
Quick ratio 0.5x – 1.4x
Cash ratio 0.3x – 0.5x
Altman Z-score -4.41 – 2.41

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCHPTAETNST
Dividend yield – – 1.2%
Net buyback yield -0.5% -0.5% 0.4%
Shareholder yield -0.5% -0.5% 1.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCHPTAETNST
Forward P/E – – 11.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-5.07FY2026 – $3.60FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – +5.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – – +19.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $461.54MFY2026 – $3.79BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +12.2%FY2026 – +2.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +3.7% – +1.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCHPTAETNST
Held by institutions 32.2% – 100.0%
Institutions holding 165 – 467
Change in shares held, QoQ +81.9% – +1.1%
Institutions buying 79 – 265
Institutions selling 26 – 149
Buyers to sellers 3.04 – 1.78

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CHPTAETNST
CHPT 1.00 -0.07 0.31
AETN -0.07 1.00 0.02
ST 0.31 0.02 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CHPT, AETN and ST?

Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) is the largest by market capitalisation: ChargePoint Holdings (CHPT) $231.24M, Aeternum Health (AETN) $109.86M, Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) $6.14B.

Which stock is cheaper, CHPT, AETN and ST?

Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (ChargePoint Holdings (CHPT) -1.3x, Aeternum Health (AETN) 84.5x, Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) 68.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

ChargePoint Holdings (CHPT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: ChargePoint Holdings (CHPT) +8.8%, Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) +0.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) has the highest net margin (ChargePoint Holdings (CHPT) -40.6%, Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) 2.4%). On return on invested capital, Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) leads (ChargePoint Holdings (CHPT) -82.8%, Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) 2.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Aeternum Health (AETN) returned the most: ChargePoint Holdings (CHPT) -25.0%, Aeternum Health (AETN) +6,833.3%, Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) +27.6%. Over five years, Aeternum Health (AETN) compounded fastest (ChargePoint Holdings (CHPT) -55.2%/yr, Aeternum Health (AETN) +15.8%/yr, Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) -5.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) has been the steadiest (ChargePoint Holdings (CHPT) 95.0%, Aeternum Health (AETN) 339.2%, Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) 39.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CHPT, AETN and ST?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Sensata Technologies Holding (ST) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.