CHKP vs CLOQ vs ICTSF Stock Comparison

Check Point Software Technologies, Cyberloq Technologies and Icts International N V Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group

Head to Head

5 decided of 12

Check Point Software Technologies leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Check Point Software Technologies 4, Icts International N V 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCHKPCLOQICTSFLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $15.96B $21.20M $167.33M CHKP
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 15.2x -21.1x -11.3x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 15.7x — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +4.6% — — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 37.9% — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -22.2% -31.8% +2.8% ICTSF
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +5.1%/yr +1.4%/yr -9.9%/yr CHKP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 41.6% 195.0% 82.0% CHKP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 56/100 25/100 — CHKP

Percentile Scorecard

CHKPCLOQICTSF

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCHKPCLOQICTSF
Valuation 90 #13 of 124 38 #77 of 124 37 #72 of 113
Growth 23 #87 of 113 27 #83 of 113 –
Profitability 94 #8 of 109 – –
Financial Health – 10 #115 of 127 50 #61 of 122
Shareholder Returns 16 #53 of 63 24 #48 of 63 –
Overall 56 25 –
  • CHKP ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • CLOQ ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • ICTSF ranked among 130 companies in Business Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCHKPCLOQICTSFSPY
1 month +20.9%0.0%-12.4% +0.7%
3 months +19.7%-16.7%-25.5% +3.7%
6 months +36.5%0.0%+2.8% +7.1%
Year to date -17.3%-28.6%+33.8% +12.8%
1 year -22.2%-31.8%+2.8% +11.9%
3 years +18.6%+50.0%+11.2% +85.2%
3 years, per year +5.8%+14.5%+3.6% +22.8%
5 years +28.3%+7.1%-40.7% +67.6%
5 years, per year +5.1%+1.4%-9.9% +10.9%
10 years +89.6%+50.0%+529.6% +262.0%
10 years, per year +6.6%+4.1%+20.2% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCHKPCLOQICTSFSPY
Volatility, 1Y 41.6%195.0%82.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 49.1%302.3%134.1% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.010.990.28 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.53-0.160.03 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -51.8%-82.9%-68.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -24.9%-31.8%-30.4% -1.2%
52-week high $204.39$0.22$6.42 $779.14
52-week low $112.47$0.07$3.10 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCHKPCLOQICTSF
P/E now vs peer median 15.7xmedian 39.0x -21.1xmedian 39.0x -11.3xmedian 21.9x
P/S now vs peer median 5.9xmedian 4.6x —median 4.6x 0.3xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 15.5xmedian 32.7x —median 32.7x —median 11.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 14.0xmedian 27.4x -32.1xmedian 27.4x -5.1xmedian 14.4x
P/B now vs peer median —median 3.2x -10.5xmedian 3.2x -7.9xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median 1.23median 1.23 2.90median 1.23 —median 0.97

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCHKPCLOQICTSF
Revenue $2.76B – –
Gross profit $2.38B – –
Operating income $802.20M -$641.64K –
Net income $1.05B -$1.00M –
Free cash flow $1.16B -$660.70K –
R&D $463.70M $215.52K –
EPS (diluted) $9.54 $-0.01 –
Cash & equivalents $596.30M $49.98K $16.89M
Total debt – $6.89M $25.53M
Shares (diluted) 109.91M 141.33M 36.18M
Enterprise value $6.97B $20.77M $54.77M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCHKPCLOQICTSF
P/E 15.7x -21.1x -11.3x
P/FCF 14.0x -32.1x -5.1x
P/Operating cash flow 14.2x -32.1x –
P/S 5.9x – 0.3x
P/B – -10.5x -7.9x
P/Tangible book – -4.7x -7.9x
EV/EBITDA 15.5x – –
EV/EBIT 17.1x -33.8x –
EV/Revenue 5.0x – –
EV/FCF 11.8x -32.9x –
EV/Operating cash flow 12.0x -32.9x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.23 2.90 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCHKPCLOQICTSF
Revenue growth (1Y) 4.6% – –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 5.3% – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 3.7% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 4.6% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -8.0% 22.2% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -3.6% -16.4% –
Net income growth (1Y) 22.2% 9.6% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 7.7% -13.1% –
EPS growth (1Y) 26.1% 15.6% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 12.8% -7.3% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -3.3% 16.9% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 2.9% -14.2% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -3.0% 16.9% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 2.7% -14.2% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCHKPCLOQICTSF
Gross margin 86.1% – –
EBITDA margin 32.0% – –
Operating margin 29.0% – –
Pretax margin 34.1% – –
Net margin 37.9% – –
FCF margin 41.8% – –
Operating cash flow margin 41.2% – –
Return on equity – – –
Return on assets 13.9% -29.8% –
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.4x – –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x 0.7x –
Stock comp / revenue 8.5% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCHKPCLOQICTSF
Debt / assets – 21.7% 4.7%
Debt / equity – -0.3x -0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – -0.9x –
Liabilities / assets – 177.5% 112.8%
Equity / assets – -77.5% -12.8%
Interest coverage – -3.2x –
Current ratio – 0.0x 1.8x
Quick ratio – 0.0x 1.6x
Cash ratio – 0.0x 0.6x
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCHKPCLOQICTSF
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -5.0% -1.5% –
Shareholder yield -5.0% -1.5% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCHKPCLOQICTSF
Forward P/E 15.7xFY2026 – –
EPS, next fiscal year $9.77FY2026 – –
EPS growth, next FY -17.8%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after +18.0% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.72BFY2026 – –
Revenue growth, next FY -0.3%FY2026 – –
Revenue growth, the year after +2.6% – –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCHKPCLOQICTSF
Held by institutions 69.5% – –
Institutions holding 634 – –
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.7% – –
Institutions buying 285 – –
Institutions selling 260 – –
Buyers to sellers 1.10 – –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CHKPCLOQICTSF
CHKP 1.00 -0.07 0.07
CLOQ -0.07 1.00 0.01
ICTSF 0.07 0.01 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CHKP, CLOQ and ICTSF?

Check Point Software Technologies (CHKP) is the largest by market capitalisation: Check Point Software Technologies (CHKP) $15.96B, Cyberloq Technologies (CLOQ) $21.20M, Icts International N V (ICTSF) $167.33M.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Icts International N V (ICTSF) returned the most: Check Point Software Technologies (CHKP) -22.2%, Cyberloq Technologies (CLOQ) -31.8%, Icts International N V (ICTSF) +2.8%. Over five years, Check Point Software Technologies (CHKP) compounded fastest (Check Point Software Technologies (CHKP) +5.1%/yr, Cyberloq Technologies (CLOQ) +1.4%/yr, Icts International N V (ICTSF) -9.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Check Point Software Technologies (CHKP) has been the steadiest (Check Point Software Technologies (CHKP) 41.6%, Cyberloq Technologies (CLOQ) 195.0%, Icts International N V (ICTSF) 82.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CHKP, CLOQ and ICTSF?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Check Point Software Technologies (CHKP) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.