CHDN vs MGM vs LAWIL Stock Comparison

Churchill Downs, MGM Resorts International and Light & Wonder Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CHDN Churchill Downs Inc
$81.52 +2.2% 1M -20.9% 1Y
Market cap
$5.71B
P/E
13.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.99B
Div. yield
–
Casinos Consumer Discretionary
6 wins
MGM MGM Resorts International
$27.98 -14.1% 1M -15.0% 1Y
Market cap
$6.96B
P/E
16.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$17.76B
Div. yield
–
Casinos Consumer Discretionary
4 wins
LAWIL Light & Wonder, Inc.
$92.45 +10.1% 1M
Market cap
$7.12B
P/E
26.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.35B
Div. yield
–
Casinos Consumer Discretionary
1 win

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Churchill Downs leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Churchill Downs 6, MGM Resorts International 4, Light & Wonder 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCHDNMGMLAWILLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $5.71B $6.96B $7.12B LAWIL
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 13.8x 16.3x 26.4x CHDN
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 11.6x 18.3x 12.5x CHDN
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +5.7% +3.2% +4.8% CHDN
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 13.8% 2.4% 8.1% CHDN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 8.4% 10.6% 9.5% MGM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 4.8x 1.7x 4.5x MGM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -20.9% -15.0% — MGM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -7.3%/yr -9.8%/yr — CHDN
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 34.3% 39.1% — CHDN
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 51/100 72/100 62/100 MGM

Percentile Scorecard

CHDNMGMLAWIL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCHDNMGMLAWIL
Valuation 63 #17 of 44 98 #2 of 44 49 #23 of 44
Growth 69 #14 of 43 52 #21 of 43 67 #15 of 43
Profitability 83 #8 of 41 60 #17 of 41 85 #7 of 41
Financial Health 20 #38 of 47 63 #18 of 47 33 #32 of 47
Shareholder Returns 21 #23 of 29 86 #5 of 29 79 #7 of 29
Overall 51 72 62
  • CHDN ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • MGM ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • LAWIL ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCHDNMGMLAWILSPY
1 month +2.2%-14.1%+10.1% -0.2%
3 months -8.6%-39.4%+12.7% +3.9%
6 months -18.1%-29.6%-9.4% +8.2%
Year to date -28.4%-23.3%— +12.9%
1 year -20.9%-15.0%— +12.3%
3 years -24.9%-18.3%— +87.4%
3 years, per year -9.1%-6.5%— +23.3%
5 years -31.6%-40.4%— +67.9%
5 years, per year -7.3%-9.8%— +10.9%
10 years +256.3%+7.7%— +261.1%
10 years, per year +13.6%+0.7%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCHDNMGMLAWILSPY
Volatility, 1Y 34.3%39.1%— 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 34.5%35.2%— 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.490.85— 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.61-0.38— 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -50.4%-49.3%-19.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -30.7%-44.8%-9.4% -1.2%
52-week high $117.59$50.69$102.00 $779.14
52-week low $73.95$27.98$82.00 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCHDNMGMLAWIL
P/E now vs peer median 13.8xmedian 17.0x 16.7xmedian 17.0x 26.4xmedian 17.0x
P/S now vs peer median 1.9xmedian 1.9x 0.4xmedian 1.9x 2.1xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 10.8xmedian 10.8x 5.0xmedian 10.8x 10.9xmedian 10.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 10.0xmedian 11.2x 4.7xmedian 11.2x 12.8xmedian 11.2x
P/B now vs peer median 4.2xmedian 2.4x 2.1xmedian 2.4x 23.6xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median 1.65median 0.56 0.97median 0.56 -4.35median 0.56

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCHDNMGMLAWIL
Revenue $2.99B $17.76B $3.35B
Gross profit $1.02B $7.84B $2.49B
Operating income $721.50M $1.02B $665.00M
Net income $415.70M $595.10M $271.00M
Free cash flow $567.90M $1.49B $555.00M
R&D – – $250.00M
EPS (diluted) $5.91 $1.65 $3.45
Cash & equivalents $196.00M $2.55B $148.00M
Total debt $4.77B $6.07B $20.38B
Shares (diluted) 70.00M 257.76M 78.50M
Enterprise value $4.93B -$2.08B $6.43B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCHDNMGMLAWIL
P/E 13.8x 16.7x 26.4x
P/FCF 10.0x 4.7x 12.8x
P/Operating cash flow 7.1x 2.9x 8.1x
P/S 1.9x 0.4x 2.1x
P/B 4.2x 2.1x 23.6x
P/Tangible book -4.8x 3.3x -16.8x
EV/EBITDA 10.8x 5.0x 10.9x
EV/EBIT 14.2x 10.4x 18.2x
EV/Revenue 3.4x 0.6x 3.6x
EV/FCF 18.1x 7.1x 21.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 12.9x 4.3x 13.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.65 0.97 -4.35

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCHDNMGMLAWIL
Revenue growth (1Y) 5.7% 3.2% 4.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 10.9% 6.2% 7.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 8.0% 1.4% 8.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 13.2% 3.0% 9.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) 1.0% -27.1% -4.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 19.7% 165.5% 18.3%
Net income growth (1Y) -4.1% -28.0% -22.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 5.2% 135.7% -12.6%
EPS growth (1Y) -1.0% -15.6% -14.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 8.4% 17.2% -6.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 1.0% -2.7% 44.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 14.3% 5.4% 75.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 54.7% 15.4% 67.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 160.6% 8.1% 46.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCHDNMGMLAWIL
Gross margin 34.2% 44.2% 74.4%
EBITDA margin 31.8% 12.0% 33.0%
Operating margin 24.1% 5.7% 19.9%
Pretax margin 19.6% 2.8% 10.4%
Net margin 13.8% 2.4% 8.1%
FCF margin 19.0% 8.4% 16.6%
Operating cash flow margin 26.6% 13.9% 26.4%
Return on equity 34.1% 20.2% 88.4%
Return on assets 5.5% 1.7% 4.3%
Return on invested capital 8.4% 10.6% 9.5%
Return on capital employed 11.7% 2.7% 11.8%
Asset turnover 0.4x 0.4x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.9x 4.1x 3.3x
Stock comp / revenue 1.1% 0.5% 3.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCHDNMGMLAWIL
Debt / assets 63.5% 15.2% 80.6%
Debt / equity 3.6x 1.8x 17.0x
Net debt / EBITDA 4.8x 1.7x 4.5x
Debt / FCF 8.4x 4.1x 9.2x
Liabilities / assets 82.2% 91.5% 95.3%
Equity / assets 17.8% 8.5% 4.7%
Interest coverage 2.5x 2.5x –
Current ratio 0.4x 1.3x 1.7x
Quick ratio 0.2x 1.1x 1.1x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.8x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 1.37 0.76 1.75

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCHDNMGMLAWIL
Dividend yield 0.5% – –
Net buyback yield 1.5% 11.0% 10.9%
Shareholder yield 2.1% 11.0% 10.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCHDNMGMLAWIL
Forward P/E 11.6xFY2026 18.3xFY2026 12.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $7.03FY2026 $1.53FY2026 $7.40FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +14.7%FY2026 -53.8%FY2026 +10.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -3.0% +18.3% +29.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.17BFY2026 $18.44BFY2026 $3.61BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +8.2%FY2026 +5.1%FY2026 +8.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +1.4% +0.3% -5.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCHDNMGMLAWIL
Held by institutions 85.5% 66.8% –
Institutions holding 462 661 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +7.5% +0.0% –
Institutions buying 239 305 –
Institutions selling 146 235 –
Buyers to sellers 1.64 1.30 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CHDNMGMLAWIL
CHDN 1.00 0.30 –
MGM 0.30 1.00 –
LAWIL – – –

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CHDN, MGM and LAWIL?

Light & Wonder (LAWIL) is the largest by market capitalisation: Churchill Downs (CHDN) $5.71B, MGM Resorts International (MGM) $6.96B, Light & Wonder (LAWIL) $7.12B.

Which stock is cheaper, CHDN, MGM and LAWIL?

Churchill Downs (CHDN) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Churchill Downs (CHDN) 13.8x, MGM Resorts International (MGM) 16.3x, Light & Wonder (LAWIL) 26.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Churchill Downs (CHDN) is cheapest (Churchill Downs (CHDN) 11.6x, MGM Resorts International (MGM) 18.3x, Light & Wonder (LAWIL) 12.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Churchill Downs (CHDN) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Churchill Downs (CHDN) +5.7%, MGM Resorts International (MGM) +3.2%, Light & Wonder (LAWIL) +4.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Churchill Downs (CHDN) has the highest net margin (Churchill Downs (CHDN) 13.8%, MGM Resorts International (MGM) 2.4%, Light & Wonder (LAWIL) 8.1%). On return on invested capital, MGM Resorts International (MGM) leads (Churchill Downs (CHDN) 8.4%, MGM Resorts International (MGM) 10.6%, Light & Wonder (LAWIL) 9.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year MGM Resorts International (MGM) returned the most: Churchill Downs (CHDN) -20.9%, MGM Resorts International (MGM) -15.0%. Over five years, Churchill Downs (CHDN) compounded fastest (Churchill Downs (CHDN) -7.3%/yr, MGM Resorts International (MGM) -9.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Churchill Downs (CHDN) has been the steadiest (Churchill Downs (CHDN) 34.3%, MGM Resorts International (MGM) 39.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CHDN, MGM and LAWIL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Churchill Downs (CHDN) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.