CGNT vs HUCK vs SRAD Stock Comparison

Cognyte Software, Huckleberry.ai and Sportradar Group AG Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CGNT Cognyte Software Ltd.
$10.19 +19.6% 1M +20.3% 1Y
Market cap
$744.67M
P/E
212.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$421.71M
Div. yield
–
Analytics and BI Technology
4 wins
HUCK Huckleberry.ai, Inc.
$3.11 -7.7% 1M -77.7% 1Y
Market cap
$136.13M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$315.21M
Div. yield
–
Analytics and BI Technology
SRAD Sportradar Group AG
$12.23 -7.6% 1M -54.9% 1Y
Market cap
$3.81B
P/E
635.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.62B
Div. yield
–
Data Infrastructure Technology
6 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Sportradar Group AG leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Sportradar Group AG 6, Cognyte Software 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCGNTHUCKSRADLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $744.67M $136.13M $3.81B SRAD
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 212.9x -3.4x 635.9x CGNT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 21.2x 44.4x 47.0x CGNT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +12.0% -1.0% +24.7% SRAD
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 0.8% -13.4% 1.2% SRAD
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — -8.6% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 67.5x 1.4x SRAD
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +20.3% -77.7% -54.9% CGNT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -12.8%/yr -48.7%/yr -9.5%/yr SRAD
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 52.2% 100.9% 56.5% CGNT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 57/100 26/100 60/100 SRAD

Percentile Scorecard

CGNTHUCKSRAD

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCGNTHUCKSRAD
Valuation 57 #44 of 101 35 #66 of 101 79 #27 of 124
Growth 90 #11 of 97 35 #63 of 97 63 #43 of 113
Profitability 63 #35 of 94 37 #60 of 94 70 #33 of 109
Financial Health 60 #44 of 108 5 #103 of 108 56 #57 of 127
Shareholder Returns 14 #55 of 64 18 #53 of 64 31 #45 of 65
Overall 57 26 60
  • CGNT ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications
  • HUCK ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications
  • SRAD ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCGNTHUCKSRADSPY
1 month +19.6%-7.7%-7.6% -0.2%
3 months +14.2%-17.3%-17.5% +3.9%
6 months +6.7%-17.1%-1.0% +8.2%
Year to date +8.4%-63.1%-48.5% +12.9%
1 year +20.3%-77.7%-54.9% +12.3%
3 years +153.5%-61.2%+39.8% +87.4%
3 years, per year +36.4%-27.1%+11.8% +23.3%
5 years -49.5%-96.5%-39.2% +67.9%
5 years, per year -12.8%-48.7%-9.5% +10.9%

Risk

MeasureCGNTHUCKSRADSPY
Volatility, 1Y 52.2%100.9%56.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 56.6%107.6%64.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.312.180.56 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.39-0.77-0.97 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -89.3%-97.8%-69.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -16.7%-77.8%-54.9% -1.2%
52-week high $12.24$14.01$27.11 $779.14
52-week low $6.34$2.00$11.56 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCGNTHUCKSRAD
P/E now vs peer median 212.9xmedian 28.3x -3.4xmedian 28.3x 635.9xmedian 38.6x
P/S now vs peer median 1.8xmedian 2.8x 0.4xmedian 2.8x 2.4xmedian 4.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 21.8xmedian 17.3x 149.4xmedian 17.3x -13.9xmedian 34.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 25.7xmedian 15.8x -15.5xmedian 15.8x 7.5xmedian 29.4x
P/B now vs peer median 3.4xmedian 3.2x -0.7xmedian 3.2x 4.3xmedian 3.3x
PEG now vs peer median 7.90median 0.85 -0.13median 0.85 21.97median 1.28

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCGNTHUCKSRAD
Revenue $421.71M $315.21M $1.62B
Gross profit $307.70M $237.80M –
Operating income $17.43M -$30.85M –
Net income $4.85M -$42.15M $19.94M
Free cash flow $28.96M -$8.79M $510.26M
R&D $127.59M $74.68M $44.37M
EPS (diluted) $0.05 $-0.92 $64,328.88
Cash & equivalents $102.17M $25.10M $286.82M
Total debt – – $49.28M
Shares (diluted) 72.91M 46.00M 310.00
Enterprise value $334.00M -$18.89M $2.10B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCGNTHUCKSRAD
P/E 212.9x -3.4x 635.9x
P/FCF 25.7x -15.5x 7.5x
P/Operating cash flow 18.0x -228.0x 7.6x
P/S 1.8x 0.4x 2.4x
P/B 3.4x -0.7x 4.3x
P/Tangible book 3.5x -0.7x 4.3x
EV/EBITDA 21.8x 149.4x -13.9x
EV/EBIT 36.9x -8.0x -41.3x
EV/Revenue 1.5x 0.8x 2.1x
EV/FCF 22.2x -28.2x 6.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 15.5x -415.9x 6.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 7.90 -0.13 21.97

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCGNTHUCKSRAD
Revenue growth (1Y) 12.0% -1.0% 24.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 12.7% -0.3% 23.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 15.3% 0.1% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 17.1% -0.7% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 406.0% 31.3% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 31.9% 22.0% –
Net income growth (1Y) 202.7% 45.6% -83.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 27.4% 20.5% 51.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 201.4% 51.9% -94.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 26.9% 26.9% 28.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 56.8% -123.5% 15.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 38.0% 57.6% 30.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 53.0% -17.9% 15.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 66.3% 22.6% 30.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCGNTHUCKSRAD
Gross margin 73.0% 75.4% –
EBITDA margin 7.0% 0.5% -15.4%
Operating margin 4.1% -9.8% –
Pretax margin 3.1% -12.8% 1.4%
Net margin 0.8% -13.4% 1.2%
FCF margin 6.9% -2.8% 31.6%
Operating cash flow margin 9.8% -0.2% 31.0%
Return on equity 2.2% – 2.1%
Return on assets 0.9% -22.7% 0.7%
Return on invested capital – – -8.6%
Return on capital employed 5.9% – -3.5%
Asset turnover 0.8x 1.7x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 8.5x 0.0x 25.1x
Stock comp / revenue 5.3% 16.2% 4.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCGNTHUCKSRAD
Debt / assets – 78.4% 0.4%
Debt / equity – -0.7x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – 67.5x 1.4x
Debt / FCF – -15.6x 0.0x
Liabilities / assets 56.6% 207.1% 69.5%
Equity / assets 43.4% -107.1% 30.5%
Interest coverage 113.9x – -0.8x
Current ratio 1.3x 0.3x 1.0x
Quick ratio 0.5x 0.2x 0.9x
Cash ratio 0.5x 0.1x 0.6x
Altman Z-score 2.25 -12.86 1.75

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCGNTHUCKSRAD
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -2.7% -0.7% -1.0%
Shareholder yield -2.7% -0.7% -1.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCGNTHUCKSRAD
Forward P/E 21.2xFY2026 44.4xFY2026 47.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.48FY2026 $0.07FY2026 $0.26FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +71.4%FY2026 – -27.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +68.8% -28.6% +100.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $426.78MFY2026 $301.44MFY2026 $1.65BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +6.7%FY2026 -5.5%FY2026 +8.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +18.3% -1.9% +10.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCGNTHUCKSRAD
Held by institutions 67.2% – 17.8%
Institutions holding 133 – 151
Change in shares held, QoQ -2.8% – -2.8%
Institutions buying 75 – 88
Institutions selling 33 – 42
Buyers to sellers 2.27 – 2.10

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CGNTHUCKSRAD
CGNT 1.00 0.37 0.19
HUCK 0.37 1.00 0.12
SRAD 0.19 0.12 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CGNT, HUCK and SRAD?

Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) is the largest by market capitalisation: Cognyte Software (CGNT) $744.67M, Huckleberry.ai (HUCK) $136.13M, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) $3.81B.

Which stock is cheaper, CGNT, HUCK and SRAD?

Cognyte Software (CGNT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Cognyte Software (CGNT) 212.9x, Huckleberry.ai (HUCK) -3.4x, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) 635.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Cognyte Software (CGNT) is cheapest (Cognyte Software (CGNT) 21.2x, Huckleberry.ai (HUCK) 44.4x, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) 47.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Cognyte Software (CGNT) +12.0%, Huckleberry.ai (HUCK) -1.0%, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) +24.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) has the highest net margin (Cognyte Software (CGNT) 0.8%, Huckleberry.ai (HUCK) -13.4%, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) 1.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Cognyte Software (CGNT) returned the most: Cognyte Software (CGNT) +20.3%, Huckleberry.ai (HUCK) -77.7%, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) -54.9%. Over five years, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) compounded fastest (Cognyte Software (CGNT) -12.8%/yr, Huckleberry.ai (HUCK) -48.7%/yr, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) -9.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Cognyte Software (CGNT) has been the steadiest (Cognyte Software (CGNT) 52.2%, Huckleberry.ai (HUCK) 100.9%, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) 56.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CGNT, HUCK and SRAD?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.