CFOO vs PRGO vs HLF Stock Comparison

China Foods Holdings, Perrigo and Herbalife Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CFOO China Foods Holdings Ltd.
$1.05 0.0% 1M +59.1% 1Y
Market cap
$21.26M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$185.87K
Div. yield
–
Personal Care Products Consumer Staples
1 win
PRGO PERRIGO Co plc
$16.02 +3.8% 1M -27.0% 1Y
Market cap
$2.21B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$4.14B
Div. yield
–
Personal Care Products Consumer Staples
3 wins
HLF Herbalife Ltd.
$13.48 +7.3% 1M +64.4% 1Y
Market cap
$1.40B
P/E
8.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.20B
Div. yield
–
Personal Care Products Consumer Staples
6 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Herbalife leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Herbalife 6, Perrigo 3, China Foods Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCFOOPRGOHLFLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $21.26M $2.21B $1.40B PRGO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -65.8x -1.3x 8.5x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 6.9x 5.4x HLF
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -46.6% -4.2% +5.5% HLF
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -173.8% -41.9% 3.2% HLF
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -26.2% 24.3% HLF
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -2.3x 2.6x PRGO
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +59.1% -27.0% +64.4% HLF
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -16.2%/yr -18.5%/yr -21.9%/yr CFOO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 75.6% 57.4% 58.5% PRGO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 20/100 39/100 59/100 HLF

Percentile Scorecard

CFOOPRGOHLF

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCFOOPRGOHLF
Valuation 14 #45 of 52 45 #29 of 52 100 #1 of 52
Growth 51 #25 of 50 6 #47 of 50 59 #21 of 50
Profitability 9 #41 of 45 18 #37 of 45 84 #8 of 45
Financial Health 7 #52 of 56 33 #38 of 56 29 #40 of 56
Shareholder Returns – 93 #3 of 31 23 #24 of 31
Overall 20 39 59
  • CFOO ranked among 60 companies in Household and Personal Products
  • PRGO ranked among 60 companies in Household and Personal Products
  • HLF ranked among 60 companies in Household and Personal Products

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCFOOPRGOHLFSPY
1 month 0.0%+3.8%+7.3% -0.2%
3 months +59.1%+55.5%+7.6% +3.9%
6 months +59.1%+39.2%-18.9% +8.2%
Year to date +59.1%+15.1%+4.6% +12.9%
1 year +59.1%-27.0%+64.4% +12.3%
3 years -58.0%-40.6%-3.4% +87.4%
3 years, per year -25.1%-16.0%-1.1% +23.3%
5 years -58.7%-64.1%-70.9% +67.9%
5 years, per year -16.2%-18.5%-21.9% +10.9%
10 years +4.0%-82.4%-55.0% +261.1%
10 years, per year +0.4%-15.9%-7.7% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCFOOPRGOHLFSPY
Volatility, 1Y 75.6%57.4%58.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y —59.6%53.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.031.031.15 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.78-0.471.10 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -74.0%-80.7%-89.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-27.0%-32.5% -1.2%
52-week high $1.05$21.94$19.96 $779.14
52-week low $0.66$9.25$7.75 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCFOOPRGOHLF
P/E now vs peer median -65.8xmedian 18.5x -1.3xmedian 18.5x 8.6xmedian 18.5x
P/S now vs peer median 114.4xmedian 1.6x 0.5xmedian 1.6x 0.3xmedian 1.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -67.3xmedian 12.9x -4.1xmedian 12.9x 4.9xmedian 12.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median -60.4xmedian 18.6x 18.6xmedian 18.6x 4.4xmedian 18.6x
P/B now vs peer median -15.0xmedian 2.2x 0.9xmedian 2.2x -3.0xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median -5.30median 0.97 0.01median 0.97 -0.74median 0.97

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCFOOPRGOHLF
Revenue $185.87K $4.14B $5.20B
Gross profit $14.61K $1.38B $4.04B
Operating income -$323.18K -$1.56B $492.30M
Net income -$323.11K -$1.73B $162.90M
Free cash flow -$352.34K $119.30M $322.30M
R&D – $95.00M –
EPS (diluted) $-0.02 $-12.43 $1.57
Cash & equivalents $15.92K $399.70M $370.50M
Total debt – $3.29B $8.02B
Shares (diluted) 20.25M 139.60M 104.50M
Enterprise value $21.15M $485.53M -$82.09M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCFOOPRGOHLF
P/E -65.8x -1.3x 8.6x
P/FCF -60.4x 18.6x 4.4x
P/Operating cash flow -60.4x 11.3x 3.7x
P/S 114.4x 0.5x 0.3x
P/B -15.0x 0.9x -3.0x
P/Tangible book -15.0x 6.8x -1.7x
EV/EBITDA -67.3x -4.1x 4.9x
EV/EBIT -65.8x -3.3x 6.2x
EV/Revenue 114.3x 1.2x 0.6x
EV/FCF -60.3x 42.9x 9.5x
EV/Operating cash flow -60.3x 26.1x 8.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -5.30 0.01 -0.74

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCFOOPRGOHLF
Revenue growth (1Y) -46.6% -4.2% 5.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -3.9% -3.6% 1.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -70.4% -10.8% 5.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 74.5% -4.6% 1.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) 31.3% -644.9% 0.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 14.4% -123.9% 4.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 33.6% -2,060% -49.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 12.4% -194.8% -10.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 33.6% -2,039% -50.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 12.4% -192.7% -11.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 17.0% -46.5% 44.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -20.9% -14.8% 8.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 20.6% -53.5% 88.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -20.9% -20.4% 27.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCFOOPRGOHLF
Gross margin 7.9% 33.3% 77.7%
EBITDA margin -169.8% -29.8% 12.1%
Operating margin -173.9% -37.7% 9.5%
Pretax margin -173.8% -38.9% 4.1%
Net margin -173.8% -41.9% 3.2%
FCF margin -189.6% 2.9% 6.2%
Operating cash flow margin -189.6% 4.7% 7.4%
Return on equity – -69.2% –
Return on assets -152.0% -22.3% 5.7%
Return on invested capital – -26.2% 24.3%
Return on capital employed – -23.2% 26.0%
Asset turnover 0.9x 0.5x 1.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x -0.1x 2.4x
Stock comp / revenue – 1.1% 0.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCFOOPRGOHLF
Debt / assets – 43.3% 70.5%
Debt / equity – 1.3x -4.2x
Net debt / EBITDA – -2.3x 2.6x
Debt / FCF – 27.6x 6.3x
Liabilities / assets 756.1% 66.9% 116.6%
Equity / assets -656.1% 33.1% -16.6%
Interest coverage – – 2.5x
Current ratio 0.1x 2.3x 1.2x
Quick ratio 0.0x 1.1x 0.5x
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.4x 0.4x
Altman Z-score -21.59 -0.39 2.46

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCFOOPRGOHLF
Dividend yield – 7.2% –
Net buyback yield – – 0.8%
Shareholder yield – 7.2% 0.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCFOOPRGOHLF
Forward P/E – 6.9xFY2026 5.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $2.33FY2026 $2.49FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -15.3%FY2026 +17.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – -1.3% +29.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $4.21BFY2026 $5.59BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – -0.9%FY2026 +10.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – -0.8% -9.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCFOOPRGOHLF
Held by institutions – 100.0% 99.1%
Institutions holding – 338 235
Change in shares held, QoQ – +6.4% -0.4%
Institutions buying – 194 129
Institutions selling – 92 72
Buyers to sellers – 2.11 1.79

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CFOOPRGOHLF
CFOO 1.00 0.00 0.02
PRGO 0.00 1.00 0.25
HLF 0.02 0.25 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CFOO, PRGO and HLF?

Perrigo (PRGO) is the largest by market capitalisation: China Foods Holdings (CFOO) $21.26M, Perrigo (PRGO) $2.21B, Herbalife (HLF) $1.40B.

Which company is growing faster?

Herbalife (HLF) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: China Foods Holdings (CFOO) -46.6%, Perrigo (PRGO) -4.2%, Herbalife (HLF) +5.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Herbalife (HLF) has the highest net margin (China Foods Holdings (CFOO) -173.8%, Perrigo (PRGO) -41.9%, Herbalife (HLF) 3.2%). On return on invested capital, Herbalife (HLF) leads (Perrigo (PRGO) -26.2%, Herbalife (HLF) 24.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Herbalife (HLF) returned the most: China Foods Holdings (CFOO) +59.1%, Perrigo (PRGO) -27.0%, Herbalife (HLF) +64.4%. Over five years, China Foods Holdings (CFOO) compounded fastest (China Foods Holdings (CFOO) -16.2%/yr, Perrigo (PRGO) -18.5%/yr, Herbalife (HLF) -21.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Perrigo (PRGO) has been the steadiest (China Foods Holdings (CFOO) 75.6%, Perrigo (PRGO) 57.4%, Herbalife (HLF) 58.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CFOO, PRGO and HLF?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Herbalife (HLF) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.