CFOO vs KMB vs RAJAF Stock Comparison

China Foods Holdings, Kimberly Clark and TFA Therapeutics Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CFOO China Foods Holdings Ltd.
$1.05 0.0% 1M +59.1% 1Y
Market cap
$21.26M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$185.87K
Div. yield
–
Personal Care Products Consumer Staples
1 win
KMB Kimberly Clark Corp
$109.10 +10.8% 1M -9.6% 1Y
Market cap
$36.34B
P/E
18.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$16.58B
Div. yield
0.05%
Personal Care Products Consumer Staples
5 wins
RAJAF TFA Therapeutics, Inc.
$9.18 0.0% 1M 0.0% 1Y
Market cap
$1.02B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Personal Care Products Consumer Staples
1 win

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Kimberly Clark leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Kimberly Clark 5, China Foods Holdings 1, TFA Therapeutics 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCFOOKMBRAJAFLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $21.26M $36.34B $1.02B KMB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -65.8x 18.6x -6,589x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 14.3x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -46.6% +0.7% — KMB
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -173.8% 11.8% — KMB
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 19.4% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.7x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.05% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +59.1% -9.6% 0.0% CFOO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -16.2%/yr -3.5%/yr — KMB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 75.6% 29.4% 0.0% RAJAF
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 20/100 54/100 — KMB

Percentile Scorecard

CFOOKMBRAJAF

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCFOOKMBRAJAF
Valuation 14 #45 of 52 57 #23 of 52 26 #39 of 52
Growth 51 #25 of 50 43 #29 of 50 –
Profitability 9 #41 of 45 82 #9 of 45 –
Financial Health 7 #52 of 56 38 #35 of 56 9 #51 of 56
Shareholder Returns – 50 #16 of 31 –
Overall 20 54 –
  • CFOO ranked among 60 companies in Household and Personal Products
  • KMB ranked among 60 companies in Household and Personal Products
  • RAJAF ranked among 60 companies in Household and Personal Products

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCFOOKMBRAJAFSPY
1 month 0.0%+10.8%0.0% -0.2%
3 months +59.1%-3.5%0.0% +3.9%
6 months +59.1%+10.8%0.0% +8.2%
Year to date +59.1%+8.1%0.0% +12.9%
1 year +59.1%-9.6%0.0% +12.3%
3 years -58.0%-6.6%— +87.4%
3 years, per year -25.1%-2.3%— +23.3%
5 years -58.7%-16.1%— +67.9%
5 years, per year -16.2%-3.5%— +10.9%
10 years +4.0%-4.1%— +261.1%
10 years, per year +0.4%-0.4%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCFOOKMBRAJAFSPY
Volatility, 1Y 75.6%29.4%0.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y —32.8%— 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.030.020.00 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.78-0.33— 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -74.0%-37.3%-18.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-9.6%0.0% -1.2%
52-week high $1.05$120.66$9.18 $779.14
52-week low $0.66$93.05$9.18 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCFOOKMBRAJAF
P/E now vs peer median -65.8xmedian 18.5x 18.5xmedian 18.5x -6,589xmedian 18.5x
P/S now vs peer median 114.4xmedian 1.6x 2.2xmedian 1.6x 819.1xmedian 1.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -67.3xmedian 12.9x 12.9xmedian 12.9x —median 12.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median -60.4xmedian 18.6x 19.9xmedian 18.6x -28,458xmedian 18.6x
P/B now vs peer median -15.0xmedian 2.2x 19.4xmedian 2.2x -1,908xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median -5.30median 0.97 2.82median 0.97 —median 0.97

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCFOOKMBRAJAF
Revenue $185.87K $16.58B –
Gross profit $14.61K $6.10B –
Operating income -$323.18K $2.51B –
Net income -$323.11K $1.99B –
Free cash flow -$352.34K $1.82B –
EPS (diluted) $-0.02 $5.87 –
Cash & equivalents $15.92K $956.00M $3.20K
Total debt – $6.52B $12.27M
Shares (diluted) 20.25M 333.30M 111.12M
Enterprise value $21.15M $33.53B $1.02B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCFOOKMBRAJAF
P/E -65.8x 18.5x -6,589x
P/FCF -60.4x 19.9x -28,458x
P/Operating cash flow -60.4x 10.9x –
P/S 114.4x 2.2x 819.1x
P/B -15.0x 19.4x -1,908x
P/Tangible book -15.0x 20.1x -1,908x
EV/EBITDA -67.3x 12.9x –
EV/EBIT -65.8x 16.6x –
EV/Revenue 114.3x 2.5x –
EV/FCF -60.3x 23.0x –
EV/Operating cash flow -60.3x 12.6x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -5.30 2.82 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCFOOKMBRAJAF
Revenue growth (1Y) -46.6% 0.7% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -3.9% -6.7% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) -70.4% 2.0% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 74.5% -2.8% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 31.3% -5.8% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 14.4% 3.5% –
Net income growth (1Y) 33.6% -18.9% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 12.4% 6.5% –
EPS growth (1Y) 33.6% -19.5% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 12.4% 6.6% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 17.0% 16.1% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -20.9% 1.5% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 20.6% -13.4% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -20.9% -8.7% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCFOOKMBRAJAF
Gross margin 7.9% 36.8% –
EBITDA margin -169.8% 19.5% –
Operating margin -173.9% 15.2% –
Pretax margin -173.8% 13.5% –
Net margin -173.8% 11.8% –
FCF margin -189.6% 11.0% –
Operating cash flow margin -189.6% 20.1% –
Return on equity – 105.0% –
Return on assets -152.0% 11.1% –
Return on invested capital – 19.4% –
Return on capital employed – 23.1% –
Asset turnover 0.9x 0.9x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x 1.7x –
Stock comp / revenue – 0.8% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCFOOKMBRAJAF
Debt / assets – 35.1% 96.1%
Debt / equity – 3.5x -8.4x
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.7x –
Debt / FCF – 3.6x –
Liabilities / assets 756.1% 89.9% 111.5%
Equity / assets -656.1% 10.1% -11.5%
Interest coverage – 10.7x –
Current ratio 0.1x 0.9x 0.2x
Quick ratio 0.0x 0.4x 0.0x
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.1x 0.0x
Altman Z-score -21.59 3.34 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCFOOKMBRAJAF
Dividend yield – 4.7% –
Net buyback yield – 0.0% –
Shareholder yield – 4.7% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – 84.4% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 92.3% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 2.2% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCFOOKMBRAJAF
Forward P/E – 14.3xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year – $7.64FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY – +1.5%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – -8.0% –
Revenue, next fiscal year – $16.99BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY – +3.3%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after – +5.2% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCFOOKMBRAJAF
Held by institutions – 96.8% –
Institutions holding – 1,710 –
Change in shares held, QoQ – +9.1% –
Institutions buying – 827 –
Institutions selling – 620 –
Buyers to sellers – 1.33 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CFOOKMBRAJAF
CFOO 1.00 0.00 –
KMB 0.00 1.00 –
RAJAF – – –

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CFOO, KMB and RAJAF?

Kimberly Clark (KMB) is the largest by market capitalisation: China Foods Holdings (CFOO) $21.26M, Kimberly Clark (KMB) $36.34B, TFA Therapeutics (RAJAF) $1.02B.

Which company is growing faster?

Kimberly Clark (KMB) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: China Foods Holdings (CFOO) -46.6%, Kimberly Clark (KMB) +0.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Kimberly Clark (KMB) has the highest net margin (China Foods Holdings (CFOO) -173.8%, Kimberly Clark (KMB) 11.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year China Foods Holdings (CFOO) returned the most: China Foods Holdings (CFOO) +59.1%, Kimberly Clark (KMB) -9.6%, TFA Therapeutics (RAJAF) 0.0%. Over five years, Kimberly Clark (KMB) compounded fastest (China Foods Holdings (CFOO) -16.2%/yr, Kimberly Clark (KMB) -3.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Kimberly Clark (KMB) 0.05%. China Foods Holdings (CFOO) and TFA Therapeutics (RAJAF) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, TFA Therapeutics (RAJAF) has been the steadiest (China Foods Holdings (CFOO) 75.6%, Kimberly Clark (KMB) 29.4%, TFA Therapeutics (RAJAF) 0.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CFOO, KMB and RAJAF?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Kimberly Clark (KMB) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.