CFOO vs DEO vs BBWI Stock Comparison

China Foods Holdings, Diageo and Bath & Body Works Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CFOO China Foods Holdings Ltd.
$1.05 0.0% 1M +59.1% 1Y
Market cap
$21.26M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$185.87K
Div. yield
–
Personal Care Products Consumer Staples
1 win
DEO Diageo Plc
$94.42 +7.9% 1M -1.9% 1Y
Market cap
$51.75B
P/E
30.2x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Spirits and Wine Consumer Staples
3 wins
BBWI Bath & Body Works, Inc.
$21.38 +30.0% 1M -20.8% 1Y
Market cap
$4.68B
P/E
7.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.38B
Div. yield
–
Personal Care Products Consumer Staples
5 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Bath & Body Works leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Bath & Body Works 5, Diageo 3, China Foods Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCFOODEOBBWILeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $21.26M $51.75B $4.68B DEO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -65.8x 30.2x 7.1x BBWI
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 15.1x 7.6x BBWI
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -46.6% — +0.1% BBWI
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -173.8% — 9.0% BBWI
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 32.2% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 2.0x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +59.1% -1.9% -20.8% CFOO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -16.2%/yr -13.8%/yr -20.8%/yr DEO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 75.4% 34.3% 61.9% DEO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 20/100 38/100 65/100 BBWI

Percentile Scorecard

CFOODEOBBWI

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCFOODEOBBWI
Valuation 14 #45 of 52 43 #22 of 38 90 #6 of 52
Growth 51 #25 of 50 – 47 #27 of 50
Profitability 9 #41 of 45 – 93 #4 of 45
Financial Health 7 #52 of 56 30 #27 of 38 31 #39 of 56
Shareholder Returns – 41 #14 of 23 63 #12 of 31
Overall 20 38 65
  • CFOO ranked among 60 companies in Household and Personal Products
  • DEO ranked among 41 companies in Beverages
  • BBWI ranked among 60 companies in Household and Personal Products

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCFOODEOBBWISPY
1 month 0.0%+7.9%+30.0% -0.8%
3 months +59.1%+10.8%+4.3% +3.5%
6 months +59.1%+19.5%+12.6% +7.0%
Year to date +59.1%+9.4%+6.5% +12.2%
1 year +59.1%-1.9%-20.8% +13.0%
3 years -58.0%-36.2%-24.4% +86.3%
3 years, per year -25.1%-13.9%-8.9% +23.1%
5 years -58.7%-52.5%-68.8% +68.6%
5 years, per year -16.2%-13.8%-20.8% +11.0%
10 years +4.0%-12.6%-63.7% +258.0%
10 years, per year +0.4%-1.3%-9.6% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureCFOODEOBBWISPY
Volatility, 1Y 75.4%34.3%61.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y —36.4%64.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.030.261.41 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.78-0.05-0.34 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -74.0%-67.4%-81.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-7.6%-18.1% -1.8%
52-week high $1.05$102.14$26.09 $779.14
52-week low $0.66$72.47$14.85 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCFOODEOBBWI
P/E now vs peer median -65.8xmedian 18.6x 30.2xmedian 26.6x 7.0xmedian 18.6x
P/S now vs peer median 114.4xmedian 1.6x 2.1xmedian 1.5x 0.6xmedian 1.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -67.3xmedian 13.0x —median 14.2x 5.2xmedian 13.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -60.4xmedian 18.4x 18.0xmedian 18.3x 4.7xmedian 18.4x
P/B now vs peer median -15.0xmedian 2.1x 4.4xmedian 2.6x -4.1xmedian 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median -5.30median 0.97 —median 2.09 3.31median 0.97

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCFOODEOBBWI
Revenue $185.87K – $7.38B
Gross profit $14.61K – $3.23B
Operating income -$323.18K – $1.13B
Net income -$323.11K – $662.00M
Free cash flow -$352.34K – –
EPS (diluted) $-0.02 – $3.28
Cash & equivalents $15.92K $1.52B $794.00M
Total debt – $93.75B $3.61B
Shares (diluted) 20.25M 557.75M 202.00M
Enterprise value $21.15M $31.82B $2.34B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCFOODEOBBWI
P/E -65.8x 30.2x 7.0x
P/FCF -60.4x 18.0x 4.7x
P/Operating cash flow -60.4x – –
P/S 114.4x 2.1x 0.6x
P/B -15.0x 4.4x -4.1x
P/Tangible book -15.0x 4.4x -3.5x
EV/EBITDA -67.3x – 5.2x
EV/EBIT -65.8x – 6.3x
EV/Revenue 114.3x – 1.0x
EV/FCF -60.3x – –
EV/Operating cash flow -60.3x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -5.30 – 3.31

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCFOODEOBBWI
Revenue growth (1Y) -46.6% – 0.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -3.9% – -0.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -70.4% – -1.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 74.5% – 0.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) 31.3% – -10.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 14.4% – -2.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 33.6% – -9.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 12.4% – -2.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 33.6% – -5.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 12.4% – 2.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 17.0% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -20.9% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 20.6% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -20.9% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCFOODEOBBWI
Gross margin 7.9% – 43.8%
EBITDA margin -169.8% – 18.7%
Operating margin -173.9% – 15.4%
Pretax margin -173.8% – 12.2%
Net margin -173.8% – 9.0%
FCF margin -189.6% – –
Operating cash flow margin -189.6% – –
Return on equity – – –
Return on assets -152.0% – 12.9%
Return on invested capital – – 32.2%
Return on capital employed – – 33.3%
Asset turnover 0.9x – 1.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x – –
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCFOODEOBBWI
Debt / assets – 48.7% 70.1%
Debt / equity – 1.8x -3.4x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 2.0x
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 756.1% 72.3% 120.5%
Equity / assets -656.1% 27.7% -20.5%
Interest coverage – – 4.2x
Current ratio 0.1x 1.6x 1.2x
Quick ratio 0.0x 1.0x 0.6x
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.6x 0.5x
Altman Z-score -21.59 – 2.32

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCFOODEOBBWI
Dividend yield – 2.1% 3.7%
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – 2.1% 3.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCFOODEOBBWI
Forward P/E – 15.1xFY2027 7.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $6.26FY2027 $2.80FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -5.0%FY2027 -12.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +7.8% -5.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $19.88BFY2027 $7.36BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +1.2%FY2027 +1.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +2.7% +0.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCFOODEOBBWI
Held by institutions – 9.2% 100.0%
Institutions holding – 719 463
Change in shares held, QoQ – +3.4% +1.6%
Institutions buying – 333 244
Institutions selling – 256 171
Buyers to sellers – 1.30 1.43

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CFOODEOBBWI
CFOO 1.00 -0.05 0.00
DEO -0.05 1.00 0.20
BBWI 0.00 0.20 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CFOO, DEO and BBWI?

Diageo (DEO) is the largest by market capitalisation: China Foods Holdings (CFOO) $21.26M, Diageo (DEO) $51.75B, Bath & Body Works (BBWI) $4.68B.

Which stock is cheaper, CFOO, DEO and BBWI?

Bath & Body Works (BBWI) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (China Foods Holdings (CFOO) -65.8x, Diageo (DEO) 30.2x, Bath & Body Works (BBWI) 7.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Bath & Body Works (BBWI) is cheapest (Diageo (DEO) 15.1x, Bath & Body Works (BBWI) 7.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Bath & Body Works (BBWI) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: China Foods Holdings (CFOO) -46.6%, Bath & Body Works (BBWI) +0.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Bath & Body Works (BBWI) has the highest net margin (China Foods Holdings (CFOO) -173.8%, Bath & Body Works (BBWI) 9.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year China Foods Holdings (CFOO) returned the most: China Foods Holdings (CFOO) +59.1%, Diageo (DEO) -1.9%, Bath & Body Works (BBWI) -20.8%. Over five years, Diageo (DEO) compounded fastest (China Foods Holdings (CFOO) -16.2%/yr, Diageo (DEO) -13.8%/yr, Bath & Body Works (BBWI) -20.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Diageo (DEO) has been the steadiest (China Foods Holdings (CFOO) 75.4%, Diageo (DEO) 34.3%, Bath & Body Works (BBWI) 61.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CFOO, DEO and BBWI?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Bath & Body Works (BBWI) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.