CFOO vs CL vs CWGL Stock Comparison

China Foods Holdings, Colgate Palmolive and Crimson Wine Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CFOO China Foods Holdings Ltd.
$1.05 0.0% 1M +59.1% 1Y
Market cap
$21.26M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$185.87K
Div. yield
–
Personal Care Products Consumer Staples
1 win
CL Colgate Palmolive Co
$92.19 +7.1% 1M +18.5% 1Y
Market cap
$73.49B
P/E
36.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$21.05B
Div. yield
2.29%
Personal Care Products Consumer Staples
9 wins
CWGL Crimson Wine Group, Ltd
$4.01 -9.3% 1M -23.6% 1Y
Market cap
$82.55M
P/E
117.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$72.36M
Div. yield
–
Spirits and Wine Consumer Staples

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Colgate Palmolive leads on 9 of the 12 questions below (Colgate Palmolive 9, China Foods Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCFOOCLCWGLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $21.26M $73.49B $82.55M CL
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -65.8x 36.2x 117.3x CL
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 24.6x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -46.6% +5.2% +1.5% CL
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -173.8% 9.7% 1.0% CL
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 27.2% -0.7% CL
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.7x 4.6x CL
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 2.29% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +59.1% +18.5% -23.6% CFOO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -16.2%/yr +3.7%/yr -14.5%/yr CL
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 75.6% 23.3% 30.7% CL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 20/100 61/100 45/100 CL

Percentile Scorecard

CFOOCLCWGL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCFOOCLCWGL
Valuation 14 #45 of 52 49 #27 of 52 65 #14 of 38
Growth 51 #25 of 50 57 #22 of 50 22 #26 of 33
Profitability 9 #41 of 45 96 #3 of 45 50 #16 of 31
Financial Health 7 #52 of 56 51 #28 of 56 75 #10 of 37
Shareholder Returns – 53 #15 of 31 14 #20 of 23
Overall 20 61 45
  • CFOO ranked among 60 companies in Household and Personal Products
  • CL ranked among 60 companies in Household and Personal Products
  • CWGL ranked among 41 companies in Beverages

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCFOOCLCWGLSPY
1 month 0.0%+7.1%-9.3% -0.2%
3 months +59.1%-0.6%+0.2% +3.9%
6 months +59.1%+7.6%-7.4% +8.2%
Year to date +59.1%+16.7%-18.2% +12.9%
1 year +59.1%+18.5%-23.6% +12.3%
3 years -58.0%+28.4%-27.1% +87.4%
3 years, per year -25.1%+8.7%-10.0% +23.3%
5 years -58.7%+19.9%-54.2% +67.9%
5 years, per year -16.2%+3.7%-14.5% +10.9%
10 years +4.0%+30.6%-57.8% +261.1%
10 years, per year +0.4%+2.7%-8.3% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCFOOCLCWGLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 75.6%23.3%30.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y —22.1%35.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.03-0.150.10 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.780.79-0.77 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -74.0%-31.1%-56.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-7.0%-23.6% -1.2%
52-week high $1.05$99.14$5.25 $779.14
52-week low $0.66$74.98$3.90 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCFOOCLCWGL
P/E now vs peer median -65.8xmedian 18.5x 36.2xmedian 18.5x 117.3xmedian 26.1x
P/S now vs peer median 114.4xmedian 1.6x 3.5xmedian 1.6x 1.1xmedian 1.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -67.3xmedian 12.9x 21.2xmedian 12.9x 19.7xmedian 14.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -60.4xmedian 18.6x 19.0xmedian 18.6x -2.6xmedian 18.1x
P/B now vs peer median -15.0xmedian 2.2x 129.8xmedian 2.2x 0.4xmedian 2.6x
PEG now vs peer median -5.30median 0.97 2.98median 0.97 -24.18median 2.07

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCFOOCLCWGL
Revenue $185.87K $21.05B $72.36M
Gross profit $14.61K $12.72B $32.85M
Operating income -$323.18K $3.13B -$2.29M
Net income -$323.11K $2.16B $704.00K
Free cash flow -$352.34K $3.86B -$31.77M
EPS (diluted) $-0.02 $2.54 $0.03
Cash & equivalents $15.92K $1.37B $11.84M
Total debt – $7.86B $36.85M
Shares (diluted) 20.25M 801.80M 20.59M
Enterprise value $21.15M $68.55B $12.21M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCFOOCLCWGL
P/E -65.8x 36.2x 117.3x
P/FCF -60.4x 19.0x -2.6x
P/Operating cash flow -60.4x 16.5x 8.8x
P/S 114.4x 3.5x 1.1x
P/B -15.0x 129.8x 0.4x
P/Tangible book -15.0x -79.1x 0.4x
EV/EBITDA -67.3x 21.2x 19.7x
EV/EBIT -65.8x 25.5x -47.0x
EV/Revenue 114.3x 3.8x 1.5x
EV/FCF -60.3x 20.7x -3.4x
EV/Operating cash flow -60.3x 17.9x 11.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -5.30 2.98 -24.18

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCFOOCLCWGL
Revenue growth (1Y) -46.6% 5.2% 1.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -3.9% 4.1% 0.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -70.4% 5.0% -0.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 74.5% 6.2% 0.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) 31.3% -26.9% -199.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 14.4% 1.1% -59.1%
Net income growth (1Y) 33.6% -29.2% 143.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 12.4% 8.9% -6.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 33.6% -29.0% 143.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 12.4% 12.2% -4.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 17.0% 13.7% 292.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -20.9% 12.9% 45.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 20.6% 14.5% -1,125%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -20.9% 17.9% -71.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCFOOCLCWGL
Gross margin 7.9% 60.4% 45.4%
EBITDA margin -169.8% 17.9% 7.5%
Operating margin -173.9% 14.9% -3.2%
Pretax margin -173.8% 14.0% 1.5%
Net margin -173.8% 9.7% 1.0%
FCF margin -189.6% 18.3% -43.9%
Operating cash flow margin -189.6% 21.2% 13.0%
Return on equity – 410.8% 0.4%
Return on assets -152.0% 12.9% 0.3%
Return on invested capital – 27.2% -0.7%
Return on capital employed – 29.7% -1.0%
Asset turnover 0.9x 1.3x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x 2.1x 13.4x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.8% 0.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCFOOCLCWGL
Debt / assets – 46.8% 15.6%
Debt / equity – 13.9x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.7x 4.6x
Debt / FCF – 2.0x -1.2x
Liabilities / assets 756.1% 96.6% 21.2%
Equity / assets -656.1% 3.4% 78.8%
Interest coverage – 12.3x -1.6x
Current ratio 0.1x 1.0x 10.5x
Quick ratio 0.0x 0.5x 2.1x
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.2x 1.0x
Altman Z-score -21.59 6.86 1.27

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCFOOCLCWGL
Dividend yield – 2.3% –
Net buyback yield – 1.5% 0.0%
Shareholder yield – 3.8% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 84.3% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 47.2% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 1.1% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 1.9% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCFOOCLCWGL
Forward P/E – 24.6xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year – $3.75FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY – +1.6%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +11.7% –
Revenue, next fiscal year – $22.42BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY – +10.0%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after – +2.1% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCFOOCLCWGL
Held by institutions – 83.8% 17.4%
Institutions holding – 2,015 5
Change in shares held, QoQ – 0.0% +1.4%
Institutions buying – 919 2
Institutions selling – 720 2
Buyers to sellers – 1.28 1.00

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CFOOCLCWGL
CFOO 1.00 -0.06 -0.10
CL -0.06 1.00 -0.11
CWGL -0.10 -0.11 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CFOO, CL and CWGL?

Colgate Palmolive (CL) is the largest by market capitalisation: China Foods Holdings (CFOO) $21.26M, Colgate Palmolive (CL) $73.49B, Crimson Wine (CWGL) $82.55M.

Which stock is cheaper, CFOO, CL and CWGL?

Colgate Palmolive (CL) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (China Foods Holdings (CFOO) -65.8x, Colgate Palmolive (CL) 36.2x, Crimson Wine (CWGL) 117.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Colgate Palmolive (CL) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: China Foods Holdings (CFOO) -46.6%, Colgate Palmolive (CL) +5.2%, Crimson Wine (CWGL) +1.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Colgate Palmolive (CL) has the highest net margin (China Foods Holdings (CFOO) -173.8%, Colgate Palmolive (CL) 9.7%, Crimson Wine (CWGL) 1.0%). On return on invested capital, Colgate Palmolive (CL) leads (Colgate Palmolive (CL) 27.2%, Crimson Wine (CWGL) -0.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year China Foods Holdings (CFOO) returned the most: China Foods Holdings (CFOO) +59.1%, Colgate Palmolive (CL) +18.5%, Crimson Wine (CWGL) -23.6%. Over five years, Colgate Palmolive (CL) compounded fastest (China Foods Holdings (CFOO) -16.2%/yr, Colgate Palmolive (CL) +3.7%/yr, Crimson Wine (CWGL) -14.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Colgate Palmolive (CL) 2.29%. China Foods Holdings (CFOO) and Crimson Wine (CWGL) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Colgate Palmolive (CL) has been the steadiest (China Foods Holdings (CFOO) 75.6%, Colgate Palmolive (CL) 23.3%, Crimson Wine (CWGL) 30.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CFOO, CL and CWGL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Colgate Palmolive (CL) leads on 9. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.