CFG vs RF vs MTB Stock Comparison

Citizens Financial, Regions Financial and M&T Bank Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
RF Regions Financial Corp
$28.47 +3.9% 1M +18.1% 1Y
Market cap
$24.42B
P/E
11.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.62B
Div. yield
0.04%
Regional Banks Financial Services
4 wins
MTB M&T Bank Corp
$221.59 +0.9% 1M +22.4% 1Y
Market cap
$32.38B
P/E
11.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.96B
Div. yield
0.03%
Regional Banks Financial Services
6 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

M&T Bank leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (M&T Bank 6, Regions Financial 4, Citizens Financial 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCFGRFMTBLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $27.63B $24.42B $32.38B MTB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 13.9x 11.4x 11.3x MTB
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 12.0x 10.4x 10.9x RF
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +11.0% +4.4% +5.8% CFG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 22.7% 28.2% 28.8% MTB
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 12.3% 14.6% 12.1% RF
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.4x 1.6x 2.4x RF
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.03% 0.04% 0.03% RF
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +27.8% +18.1% +22.4% CFG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +5.3%/yr +3.4%/yr +6.8%/yr MTB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 25.3% 23.5% 21.5% MTB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 31/100 34/100 50/100 MTB

Percentile Scorecard

CFGRFMTB

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCFGRFMTB
Valuation 26 #268 of 361 21 #285 of 361 47 #192 of 361
Growth 34 #229 of 344 5 #326 of 344 18 #282 of 344
Profitability 26 #259 of 348 39 #213 of 348 76 #85 of 348
Financial Health 25 #254 of 340 46 #184 of 340 40 #206 of 340
Shareholder Returns 44 #199 of 352 60 #140 of 352 70 #106 of 352
Overall 31 34 50
  • CFG ranked among 370 companies in Banking
  • RF ranked among 370 companies in Banking
  • MTB ranked among 370 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCFGRFMTBSPY
1 month +0.8%+3.9%+0.9% -1.0%
3 months -9.4%-7.7%-11.2% +2.9%
6 months +2.1%+2.6%+3.1% +6.4%
Year to date +11.5%+5.1%+10.0% +11.4%
1 year +27.8%+18.1%+22.4% +13.1%
3 years +176.3%+100.9%+99.4% +79.4%
3 years, per year +40.3%+26.2%+25.9% +21.5%
5 years +29.6%+18.2%+38.6% +67.7%
5 years, per year +5.3%+3.4%+6.8% +10.9%
10 years +150.8%+167.6%+86.4% +255.2%
10 years, per year +9.6%+10.3%+6.4% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureCFGRFMTBSPY
Volatility, 1Y 25.3%23.5%21.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 25.5%25.7%21.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.870.650.56 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.100.771.04 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -59.4%-44.9%-43.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -12.8%-12.1%-12.8% -2.5%
52-week high $74.73$32.40$254.11 $779.14
52-week low $49.71$24.07$180.90 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCFGRFMTB
P/E now vs peer median 13.9xmedian 12.5x 11.3xmedian 12.5x 11.3xmedian 12.5x
P/S now vs peer median 3.2xmedian 3.5x 3.2xmedian 3.5x 3.2xmedian 3.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 6.5xmedian 4.8x 6.5xmedian 4.8x 6.5xmedian 4.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 11.7xmedian 11.4x 14.5xmedian 11.4x 8.9xmedian 11.4x
P/B now vs peer median 1.1xmedian 1.2x 1.3xmedian 1.2x 1.1xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 12.58median 1.48 5.18median 1.48 3.43median 1.48

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCFGRFMTB
Revenue $8.73B $7.62B $9.96B
Net income $2.13B $2.23B $3.03B
Free cash flow $2.35B $1.67B $3.60B
EPS (diluted) $4.65 $2.51 $19.58
Total debt $16.35B $7.63B $18.18B
Shares (diluted) 426.68M 857.00M 146.76M
Enterprise value $27.63B $24.42B $32.38B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCFGRFMTB
P/E 13.9x 11.3x 11.3x
P/FCF 11.7x 14.5x 8.9x
P/Operating cash flow 11.0x 13.6x 8.4x
P/S 3.2x 3.2x 3.2x
P/B 1.1x 1.3x 1.1x
P/Tangible book 1.1x 1.4x 1.1x
EV/EBITDA 6.5x 6.5x 6.5x
EV/EBIT 6.9x 6.6x 6.9x
EV/Revenue 5.0x 4.2x 5.0x
EV/FCF 18.6x 19.1x 14.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 17.5x 17.9x 13.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 12.58 5.18 3.43

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCFGRFMTB
Revenue growth (1Y) 11.0% 4.4% 5.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 0.5% -0.7% -12.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) 33.5% 7.5% 12.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -2.3% -1.1% 0.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 39.7% 15.6% 23.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 1.1% 2.2% 3.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 94.5% -33.7% 21.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -24.1% -6.7% 0.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 103.4% -30.0% 21.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -24.9% -6.9% 0.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCFGRFMTB
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin 78.0% 64.2% 77.1%
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin 31.1% 37.4% 39.4%
Net margin 22.7% 28.2% 28.8%
FCF margin 27.0% 21.9% 36.1%
Operating cash flow margin 28.7% 23.3% 38.2%
Return on equity 8.1% 11.8% 10.8%
Return on assets 0.9% 1.4% 1.4%
Return on invested capital 12.3% 14.6% 12.1%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.0x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.2x 0.8x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue 1.5% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCFGRFMTB
Debt / assets 7.0% 4.7% 8.3%
Debt / equity 0.6x 0.4x 0.7x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.4x 1.6x 2.4x
Debt / FCF 6.9x 4.6x 5.1x
Liabilities / assets 88.8% 88.3% 87.3%
Equity / assets 11.2% 11.7% 12.7%
Interest coverage 1.7x 2.5x 2.2x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCFGRFMTB
Dividend yield 2.8% 3.9% 2.7%
Net buyback yield 2.7% 4.7% 8.0%
Shareholder yield 5.5% 8.6% 10.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) 36.7% 41.1% 29.9%
Payout ratio (FCF) 33.1% 55.0% 25.2%
Dividend growth (1Y) 4.1% 1.8% 2.1%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -2.0% 8.5% 2.1%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCFGRFMTB
Forward P/E 12.0xFY2026 10.4xFY2026 10.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $5.41FY2026 $2.73FY2026 $20.30FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +40.2%FY2026 +17.2%FY2026 +19.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +27.5% -2.2% +0.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $8.60BFY2026 $7.33BFY2026 $10.59BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +4.3%FY2026 -3.3%FY2026 +9.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +11.3% +16.3% -4.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCFGRFMTB
Held by institutions 96.7% 84.8% 90.2%
Institutions holding 1,097 1,105 1,148
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.9% +2.9% -0.4%
Institutions buying 633 559 524
Institutions selling 314 347 392
Buyers to sellers 2.02 1.61 1.34

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CFGRFMTB
CFG 1.00 0.88 0.86
RF 0.88 1.00 0.90
MTB 0.86 0.90 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CFG, RF and MTB?

M&T Bank (MTB) is the largest by market capitalisation: Citizens Financial (CFG) $27.63B, Regions Financial (RF) $24.42B, M&T Bank (MTB) $32.38B.

Which stock is cheaper, CFG, RF and MTB?

M&T Bank (MTB) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Citizens Financial (CFG) 13.9x, Regions Financial (RF) 11.4x, M&T Bank (MTB) 11.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Regions Financial (RF) is cheapest (Citizens Financial (CFG) 12.0x, Regions Financial (RF) 10.4x, M&T Bank (MTB) 10.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Citizens Financial (CFG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Citizens Financial (CFG) +11.0%, Regions Financial (RF) +4.4%, M&T Bank (MTB) +5.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

M&T Bank (MTB) has the highest net margin (Citizens Financial (CFG) 22.7%, Regions Financial (RF) 28.2%, M&T Bank (MTB) 28.8%). On return on invested capital, Regions Financial (RF) leads (Citizens Financial (CFG) 12.3%, Regions Financial (RF) 14.6%, M&T Bank (MTB) 12.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Citizens Financial (CFG) returned the most: Citizens Financial (CFG) +27.8%, Regions Financial (RF) +18.1%, M&T Bank (MTB) +22.4%. Over five years, M&T Bank (MTB) compounded fastest (Citizens Financial (CFG) +5.3%/yr, Regions Financial (RF) +3.4%/yr, M&T Bank (MTB) +6.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Regions Financial (RF) has the highest dividend yield: Citizens Financial (CFG) 0.03%, Regions Financial (RF) 0.04%, M&T Bank (MTB) 0.03%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, M&T Bank (MTB) has been the steadiest (Citizens Financial (CFG) 25.3%, Regions Financial (RF) 23.5%, M&T Bank (MTB) 21.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CFG, RF and MTB?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, M&T Bank (MTB) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.