CFG vs RF vs BSAC Stock Comparison

Citizens Financial, Regions Financial and Banco Santander Chile Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
RF Regions Financial Corp
$28.60 +3.5% 1M +16.4% 1Y
Market cap
$24.31B
P/E
11.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.62B
Div. yield
0.04%
Regional Banks Financial Services
6 wins
BSAC Banco Santander Chile
$31.64 -7.9% 1M +11.8% 1Y
Market cap
$14.94B
P/E
0.0x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Regional Banks Financial Services
3 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Regions Financial leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Regions Financial 6, Citizens Financial 3, Banco Santander Chile 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCFGRFBSACLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $27.58B $24.31B $14.94B CFG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 13.9x 11.3x 0.0x BSAC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 12.1x 10.3x 11.1x RF
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +11.0% +4.4% — CFG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 22.7% 28.2% — RF
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 12.3% 14.6% — RF
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.4x 1.6x 0.0x BSAC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.03% 0.04% 0.00% RF
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +25.3% +16.4% +11.8% CFG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +6.5%/yr +4.1%/yr +11.9%/yr BSAC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 25.3% 23.4% 28.9% RF
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 37/100 39/100 33/100 RF

Percentile Scorecard

CFGRFBSAC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCFGRFBSAC
Valuation 27 #263 of 362 23 #280 of 362 12 #320 of 362
Growth 36 #142 of 221 8 #203 of 221 20 #178 of 221
Profitability 37 #126 of 200 48 #105 of 200 –
Financial Health 32 #139 of 203 48 #106 of 203 8 #187 of 203
Shareholder Returns 53 #161 of 342 66 #117 of 342 93 #25 of 342
Overall 37 39 33
  • CFG ranked among 370 companies in Banking
  • RF ranked among 370 companies in Banking
  • BSAC ranked among 370 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCFGRFBSACSPY
1 month -0.3%+3.5%-7.9% -0.8%
3 months -8.1%-7.0%-8.2% +3.5%
6 months +0.9%+1.2%-5.3% +7.0%
Year to date +11.9%+5.5%+1.7% +12.2%
1 year +25.3%+16.4%+11.8% +13.0%
3 years +185.8%+104.1%+81.0% +86.3%
3 years, per year +41.9%+26.9%+21.9% +23.1%
5 years +37.3%+22.4%+75.5% +68.6%
5 years, per year +6.5%+4.1%+11.9% +11.0%
10 years +143.2%+166.0%+44.7% +258.0%
10 years, per year +9.3%+10.3%+3.8% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureCFGRFBSACSPY
Volatility, 1Y 25.3%23.4%28.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 25.6%25.7%30.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.870.661.09 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.000.700.41 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -59.4%-44.9%-40.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -12.5%-11.7%-15.5% -1.8%
52-week high $74.73$32.40$37.46 $779.14
52-week low $49.71$24.07$28.22 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCFGRFBSAC
P/E now vs peer median 13.9xmedian 12.1x 11.4xmedian 12.1x 0.0xmedian 12.1x
P/S now vs peer median 3.2xmedian 3.4x 3.2xmedian 3.4x 2.8xmedian 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 6.5xmedian 5.0x 6.5xmedian 5.0x 0.0xmedian 5.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 11.7xmedian 11.0x 14.6xmedian 11.0x -483.6xmedian 11.0x
P/B now vs peer median 1.1xmedian 1.2x 1.3xmedian 1.2x 2.4xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 12.62median 1.36 5.21median 1.36 0.00median 1.36

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCFGRFBSAC
Revenue $8.73B $7.62B –
Operating income – – $278.26B
Net income $2.13B $2.23B -$1.70T
Free cash flow $2.35B $1.67B –
EPS (diluted) $4.65 $2.51 $1,126.89
Cash & equivalents – – $2.20B
Total debt $16.35B $7.63B $49.65B
Shares (diluted) 426.68M 857.00M 471.12M
Enterprise value $27.58B $24.31B -$10.98T

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCFGRFBSAC
P/E 13.9x 11.4x 0.0x
P/FCF 11.7x 14.6x -483.6x
P/Operating cash flow 11.0x 13.7x –
P/S 3.2x 3.2x 2.8x
P/B 1.1x 1.3x 2.4x
P/Tangible book 1.1x 1.4x -0.2x
EV/EBITDA 6.5x 6.5x 0.0x
EV/EBIT 6.9x 6.7x 0.2x
EV/Revenue 5.0x 4.2x –
EV/FCF 18.7x 19.2x –
EV/Operating cash flow 17.6x 18.0x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 12.62 5.21 0.00

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCFGRFBSAC
Revenue growth (1Y) 11.0% 4.4% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 0.5% -0.7% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – -85.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – 44.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 33.5% 7.5% -229.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -2.3% -1.1% -114.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 39.7% 15.6% -18.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 1.1% 2.2% 48.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 94.5% -33.7% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -24.1% -6.7% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 103.4% -30.0% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -24.9% -6.9% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCFGRFBSAC
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin 78.0% 64.2% –
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin 31.1% 37.4% –
Net margin 22.7% 28.2% –
FCF margin 27.0% 21.9% –
Operating cash flow margin 28.7% 23.3% –
Return on equity 8.1% 11.8% –
Return on assets 0.9% 1.4% 2,022%
Return on invested capital 12.3% 14.6% –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.0x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.2x 0.8x –
Stock comp / revenue 1.5% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCFGRFBSAC
Debt / assets 7.0% 4.7% 65.6%
Debt / equity 0.6x 0.4x 8.0x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.4x 1.6x 0.0x
Debt / FCF 6.9x 4.6x –
Liabilities / assets 88.8% 88.3% 91.8%
Equity / assets 11.2% 11.7% 8.2%
Interest coverage 1.7x 2.5x –
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – 0.1x
Cash ratio – – 0.1x
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCFGRFBSAC
Dividend yield 2.8% 3.9% 4.7%
Net buyback yield 2.6% 4.7% –
Shareholder yield 5.5% 8.5% 4.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) 36.7% 41.1% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 33.1% 55.0% –
Dividend growth (1Y) 4.1% 1.8% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -2.0% 8.5% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCFGRFBSAC
Forward P/E 12.1xFY2026 10.3xFY2026 11.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $5.42FY2026 $2.79FY2026 $2.84FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +40.4%FY2026 +19.7%FY2026 +9.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +27.1% -4.3% +2.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $8.59BFY2026 $7.33BFY2026 $3.07BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +4.1%FY2026 -3.3%FY2026 -7.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +11.3% +16.2% +19.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCFGRFBSAC
Held by institutions 96.7% 84.8% 4.7%
Institutions holding 1,097 1,105 157
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.9% +2.9% +1.7%
Institutions buying 633 559 82
Institutions selling 314 347 51
Buyers to sellers 2.02 1.61 1.61

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CFGRFBSAC
CFG 1.00 0.88 0.39
RF 0.88 1.00 0.31
BSAC 0.39 0.31 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CFG, RF and BSAC?

Citizens Financial (CFG) is the largest by market capitalisation: Citizens Financial (CFG) $27.58B, Regions Financial (RF) $24.31B, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) $14.94B.

Which stock is cheaper, CFG, RF and BSAC?

Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Citizens Financial (CFG) 13.9x, Regions Financial (RF) 11.3x, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) 0.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Regions Financial (RF) is cheapest (Citizens Financial (CFG) 12.1x, Regions Financial (RF) 10.3x, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) 11.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Citizens Financial (CFG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Citizens Financial (CFG) +11.0%, Regions Financial (RF) +4.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Regions Financial (RF) has the highest net margin (Citizens Financial (CFG) 22.7%, Regions Financial (RF) 28.2%). On return on invested capital, Regions Financial (RF) leads (Citizens Financial (CFG) 12.3%, Regions Financial (RF) 14.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Citizens Financial (CFG) returned the most: Citizens Financial (CFG) +25.3%, Regions Financial (RF) +16.4%, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) +11.8%. Over five years, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) compounded fastest (Citizens Financial (CFG) +6.5%/yr, Regions Financial (RF) +4.1%/yr, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) +11.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Regions Financial (RF) has the highest dividend yield: Citizens Financial (CFG) 0.03%, Regions Financial (RF) 0.04%, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) 0.00%. Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Regions Financial (RF) has been the steadiest (Citizens Financial (CFG) 25.3%, Regions Financial (RF) 23.4%, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) 28.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CFG, RF and BSAC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Regions Financial (RF) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.