CFG vs FNMA vs MTB Stock Comparison

Citizens Financial, Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae and M&T Bank Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MTB M&T Bank Corp
$220.26 -0.1% 1M +21.4% 1Y
Market cap
$32.68B
P/E
11.3x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Regional Banks Financial Services
3 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Citizens Financial leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Citizens Financial 4, M&T Bank 3, Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCFGFNMAMTBLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $27.66B $27.28B $32.68B MTB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 13.0x 21.8x 11.3x MTB
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 12.0x 1.5x 10.8x FNMA
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +10.6% -0.1% — CFG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 23.8% 4.2% — CFG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 12.0% 2.9% — CFG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.6x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.03% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +27.2% -64.8% +21.4% CFG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +6.6%/yr +35.7%/yr +8.4%/yr FNMA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 25.2% 85.7% 21.3% MTB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 30/100 57/100 — FNMA

Percentile Scorecard

CFGFNMAMTB

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCFGFNMAMTB
Valuation 19 #293 of 361 72 #48 of 169 67 #119 of 361
Growth 19 #139 of 172 87 #22 of 162 –
Profitability 28 #108 of 149 63 #56 of 149 –
Financial Health 29 #113 of 158 6 #149 of 158 –
Shareholder Returns 54 #157 of 338 – 59 #141 of 338
Overall 30 57 –
  • CFG ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • FNMA ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit
  • MTB ranked among 368 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCFGFNMAMTBSPY
1 month +0.8%-6.9%-0.1% +0.9%
3 months -8.5%-33.3%-12.0% +5.9%
6 months +1.4%-47.3%+2.2% +8.5%
Year to date +11.8%-62.3%+9.3% +13.3%
1 year +27.2%-64.8%+21.4% +12.4%
3 years +185.5%+454.8%+102.2% +88.1%
3 years, per year +41.9%+77.1%+26.5% +23.5%
5 years +37.8%+360.2%+49.7% +68.2%
5 years, per year +6.6%+35.7%+8.4% +11.0%
10 years +147.8%+139.6%+80.4% +263.4%
10 years, per year +9.5%+9.1%+6.1% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureCFGFNMAMTBSPY
Volatility, 1Y 25.2%85.7%21.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 25.4%74.2%21.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.871.290.56 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.08-0.761.01 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -59.4%-78.7%-43.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -12.6%-66.1%-13.3% -0.9%
52-week high $74.73$11.95$254.11 $779.14
52-week low $49.71$3.26$180.90 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCFGFNMAMTB
P/E now vs peer median 12.9xmedian 12.1x 18.9xmedian 11.4x 11.1xmedian 12.1x
P/S now vs peer median 3.1xmedian 3.4x 0.8xmedian 2.7x 3.2xmedian 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 6.5xmedian 5.1x —median 11.3x —median 5.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 25.2xmedian 10.8x 0.7xmedian 6.9x 8.7xmedian 10.8x
P/B now vs peer median 1.1xmedian 1.2x 0.2xmedian 0.7x 1.1xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 2.02median 1.32 0.04median 0.34 3.28median 1.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCFGFNMAMTB
Revenue $8.93B $30.12B –
Net income $2.27B $15.41B –
Free cash flow $1.09B $32.60B –
EPS (diluted) $4.99 $0.21 $19.72
Total debt $17.83B $4.17T –
Shares (diluted) 425.66M 5.89B 146.76M
Enterprise value $27.66B $27.28B $32.68B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCFGFNMAMTB
P/E 12.9x 18.9x 11.1x
P/FCF 25.2x 0.7x 8.7x
P/Operating cash flow 21.9x 0.7x –
P/S 3.1x 0.8x 3.2x
P/B 1.1x 0.2x 1.1x
P/Tangible book 1.1x 0.2x 1.1x
EV/EBITDA 6.5x – –
EV/EBIT 7.0x 27.5x –
EV/Revenue 5.1x 139.2x –
EV/FCF 41.5x 128.6x –
EV/Operating cash flow 36.0x 128.6x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.02 0.04 3.28

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCFGFNMAMTB
Revenue growth (1Y) 10.6% -0.1% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 1.9% 0.4% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) 33.1% 2.9% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 3.1% 1.1% –
EPS growth (1Y) 38.9% 10,350% 17.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 6.4% 493.4% 3.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -55.9% 480.8% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -30.4% 17.2% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -59.8% 480.8% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -32.9% 17.2% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCFGFNMAMTB
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin 77.7% – –
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin 32.3% 63.7% –
Net margin 23.8% 4.2% –
FCF margin 12.2% 108.2% –
Operating cash flow margin 14.1% 108.2% –
Return on equity 8.8% 13.0% –
Return on assets 1.0% 0.4% –
Return on invested capital 12.0% 2.9% –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.0x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.6x 2.1x –
Stock comp / revenue 1.5% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCFGFNMAMTB
Debt / assets 7.6% 96.6% –
Debt / equity 0.7x 34.8x –
Net debt / EBITDA 2.6x – –
Debt / FCF 16.3x 127.9x –
Liabilities / assets 89.3% 97.2% 87.2%
Equity / assets 10.7% 2.8% 12.8%
Interest coverage 1.8x 1.1x –
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCFGFNMAMTB
Dividend yield 2.8% – 2.7%
Net buyback yield 4.3% – –
Shareholder yield 7.1% 0.0% 2.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) 35.0% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 72.6% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 6.7% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -1.1% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCFGFNMAMTB
Forward P/E 12.0xFY2026 1.5xFY2026 10.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $5.42FY2026 $2.78FY2026 $20.48FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +40.4%FY2026 +13.9%FY2026 +20.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +27.1% -7.9% -0.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $8.59BFY2026 $31.10BFY2026 $10.60BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +4.1%FY2026 +7.4%FY2026 +9.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +11.4% -7.3% -4.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCFGFNMAMTB
Held by institutions 96.7% 0.0% 90.2%
Institutions holding 1,097 25 1,148
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.9% +58.6% -0.4%
Institutions buying 633 13 524
Institutions selling 314 2 392
Buyers to sellers 2.02 6.50 1.34

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CFGFNMAMTB
CFG 1.00 0.19 0.86
FNMA 0.19 1.00 0.18
MTB 0.86 0.18 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CFG, FNMA and MTB?

M&T Bank (MTB) is the largest by market capitalisation: Citizens Financial (CFG) $27.66B, Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) $27.28B, M&T Bank (MTB) $32.68B.

Which stock is cheaper, CFG, FNMA and MTB?

M&T Bank (MTB) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Citizens Financial (CFG) 13.0x, Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) 21.8x, M&T Bank (MTB) 11.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) is cheapest (Citizens Financial (CFG) 12.0x, Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) 1.5x, M&T Bank (MTB) 10.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Citizens Financial (CFG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Citizens Financial (CFG) +10.6%, Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) -0.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Citizens Financial (CFG) has the highest net margin (Citizens Financial (CFG) 23.8%, Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) 4.2%). On return on invested capital, Citizens Financial (CFG) leads (Citizens Financial (CFG) 12.0%, Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) 2.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Citizens Financial (CFG) returned the most: Citizens Financial (CFG) +27.2%, Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) -64.8%, M&T Bank (MTB) +21.4%. Over five years, Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) compounded fastest (Citizens Financial (CFG) +6.6%/yr, Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) +35.7%/yr, M&T Bank (MTB) +8.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Citizens Financial (CFG) 0.03%, Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) 0.00%, M&T Bank (MTB) 0.00%. Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) and M&T Bank (MTB) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, M&T Bank (MTB) has been the steadiest (Citizens Financial (CFG) 25.2%, Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) 85.7%, M&T Bank (MTB) 21.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CFG, FNMA and MTB?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Citizens Financial (CFG) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.