CFG vs BSAC vs BMA Stock Comparison

Citizens Financial, Banco Santander Chile and Macro Bank Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BSAC Banco Santander Chile
$31.82 -7.4% 1M +12.3% 1Y
Market cap
$14.99B
P/E
0.0x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
4.65%
Regional Banks Financial Services
2 wins
BMA Macro Bank Inc.
$61.89 -10.0% 1M -21.8% 1Y
Market cap
$5.18B
P/E
39.7x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
6.22%
Regional Banks Financial Services
3 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Citizens Financial leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Citizens Financial 4, Macro Bank 3, Banco Santander Chile 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCFGBSACBMALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $27.60B $14.99B $5.18B CFG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 13.9x 0.0x 39.7x BSAC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 12.0x 11.2x 7.3x BMA
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +11.0% — — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 22.7% — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 12.3% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.4x 0.0x — BSAC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 2.82% 4.65% 6.22% BMA
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +25.8% +12.3% -21.8% CFG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +6.4%/yr +11.9%/yr +30.1%/yr BMA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 25.2% 28.9% 50.7% CFG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 37/100 33/100 — CFG

Percentile Scorecard

CFGBSACBMA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCFGBSACBMA
Valuation 28 #260 of 360 11 #319 of 360 21 #286 of 360
Growth 36 #123 of 191 21 #152 of 191 –
Profitability 38 #105 of 168 – –
Financial Health 32 #119 of 175 8 #161 of 175 –
Shareholder Returns 53 #161 of 341 93 #25 of 341 98 #7 of 341
Overall 37 33 –
  • CFG ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • BSAC ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • BMA ranked among 368 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCFGBSACBMASPY
1 month -0.4%-7.4%-10.0% -0.2%
3 months -10.5%-6.2%-31.8% +3.9%
6 months +0.5%-3.8%-18.0% +8.2%
Year to date +11.8%+2.3%-31.4% +12.9%
1 year +25.8%+12.3%-21.8% +12.3%
3 years +185.5%+82.0%+218.5% +87.4%
3 years, per year +41.9%+22.1%+47.2% +23.3%
5 years +36.3%+75.4%+272.4% +67.9%
5 years, per year +6.4%+11.9%+30.1% +10.9%
10 years +143.0%+44.2%-19.6% +261.1%
10 years, per year +9.3%+3.7%-2.2% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCFGBSACBMASPY
Volatility, 1Y 25.2%28.9%50.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 25.5%30.5%45.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.871.091.85 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.020.43-0.43 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -59.4%-40.5%-66.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -12.6%-15.1%-40.9% -1.2%
52-week high $74.73$37.46$104.70 $779.14
52-week low $49.71$28.22$61.59 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCFGBSACBMA
P/E now vs peer median 13.9xmedian 12.1x 0.0xmedian 12.1x 39.7xmedian 12.1x
P/S now vs peer median 3.2xmedian 3.4x 2.8xmedian 3.4x 1.9xmedian 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 6.5xmedian 5.0x 0.0xmedian 5.0x —median 5.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 11.7xmedian 10.9x -486.3xmedian 10.9x 19.6xmedian 10.9x
P/B now vs peer median 1.1xmedian 1.2x 2.4xmedian 1.2x 1.4xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 12.61median 1.34 0.00median 1.34 —median 1.34

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCFGBSACBMA
Revenue $8.73B – –
Operating income – $278.26B –
Net income $2.13B -$1.70T –
Free cash flow $2.35B – –
EPS (diluted) $4.65 $1,126.89 –
Cash & equivalents – $2.20B $2.10B
Total debt $16.35B $47.85B –
Shares (diluted) 426.68M 471.12M 1.27B
Enterprise value $27.60B -$10.86T -$2.72B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCFGBSACBMA
P/E 13.9x 0.0x 39.7x
P/FCF 11.7x -486.3x 19.6x
P/Operating cash flow 11.0x – –
P/S 3.2x 2.8x 1.9x
P/B 1.1x 2.4x 1.4x
P/Tangible book 1.1x -0.2x 1.4x
EV/EBITDA 6.5x 0.0x –
EV/EBIT 6.9x 0.2x –
EV/Revenue 5.0x – –
EV/FCF 18.7x – –
EV/Operating cash flow 17.6x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 12.61 0.00 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCFGBSACBMA
Revenue growth (1Y) 11.0% – –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 0.5% – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – -85.8% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 44.6% –
Net income growth (1Y) 33.5% -229.4% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) -2.3% -114.2% –
EPS growth (1Y) 39.7% -18.5% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 1.1% 48.4% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 94.5% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -24.1% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 103.4% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -24.9% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCFGBSACBMA
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin 78.0% – –
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin 31.1% – –
Net margin 22.7% – –
FCF margin 27.0% – –
Operating cash flow margin 28.7% – –
Return on equity 8.1% – –
Return on assets 0.9% 2,022% –
Return on invested capital 12.3% – –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.0x – –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.2x – –
Stock comp / revenue 1.5% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCFGBSACBMA
Debt / assets 7.0% 63.2% –
Debt / equity 0.6x 7.7x –
Net debt / EBITDA 2.4x 0.0x –
Debt / FCF 6.9x – –
Liabilities / assets 88.8% 91.8% 77.5%
Equity / assets 11.2% 8.2% 22.5%
Interest coverage 1.7x – –
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – 0.1x –
Cash ratio – 0.1x –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCFGBSACBMA
Dividend yield 2.8% 4.7% 6.2%
Net buyback yield 2.7% – –
Shareholder yield 5.5% 4.7% 6.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) 36.7% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 33.1% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 4.1% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -2.0% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCFGBSACBMA
Forward P/E 12.0xFY2026 11.2xFY2026 7.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $5.42FY2026 $2.84FY2026 $8.46FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +40.4%FY2026 +9.7%FY2026 +159.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +27.1% +2.5% +50.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $8.59BFY2026 $3.07BFY2026 $3.93BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +4.1%FY2026 -7.8%FY2026 +25.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +11.4% +19.1% +25.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCFGBSACBMA
Held by institutions 96.7% 4.7% 9.3%
Institutions holding 1,097 157 94
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.9% +1.7% +5.0%
Institutions buying 633 82 51
Institutions selling 314 51 27
Buyers to sellers 2.02 1.61 1.89

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CFGBSACBMA
CFG 1.00 0.39 0.33
BSAC 0.39 1.00 0.50
BMA 0.33 0.50 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CFG, BSAC and BMA?

Citizens Financial (CFG) is the largest by market capitalisation: Citizens Financial (CFG) $27.60B, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) $14.99B, Macro Bank (BMA) $5.18B.

Which stock is cheaper, CFG, BSAC and BMA?

Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Citizens Financial (CFG) 13.9x, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) 0.0x, Macro Bank (BMA) 39.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Macro Bank (BMA) is cheapest (Citizens Financial (CFG) 12.0x, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) 11.2x, Macro Bank (BMA) 7.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Citizens Financial (CFG) returned the most: Citizens Financial (CFG) +25.8%, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) +12.3%, Macro Bank (BMA) -21.8%. Over five years, Macro Bank (BMA) compounded fastest (Citizens Financial (CFG) +6.4%/yr, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) +11.9%/yr, Macro Bank (BMA) +30.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Macro Bank (BMA) has the highest dividend yield: Citizens Financial (CFG) 2.82%, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) 4.65%, Macro Bank (BMA) 6.22%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Citizens Financial (CFG) has been the steadiest (Citizens Financial (CFG) 25.2%, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) 28.9%, Macro Bank (BMA) 50.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CFG, BSAC and BMA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Citizens Financial (CFG) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.