CEVA vs DLB vs SQNS Stock Comparison

Ceva, Dolby Laboratories and Sequans Communications Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CEVA Ceva Inc
$31.37 -13.3% 1M +10.5% 1Y
Market cap
$882.69M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor EDA Software Technology
1 win
DLB Dolby Laboratories, Inc.
$62.74 +7.0% 1M -7.2% 1Y
Market cap
$5.91B
P/E
26.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.35B
Div. yield
2.30%
Semiconductor EDA Software Technology
7 wins
SQNS Sequans Communications
$2.48 -13.6% 1M -66.8% 1Y
Market cap
$991.75M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$24.46M
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Design Technology

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Dolby Laboratories leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Dolby Laboratories 7, Ceva 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCEVADLBSQNSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $882.69M $5.91B $991.75M DLB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -80.0x 26.1x -3.3x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 60.3x 14.0x — DLB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +0.6% -34.5% DLB
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 16.7% -660.3% DLB
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 2.30% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +10.5% -7.2% -66.8% CEVA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -7.0%/yr -6.4%/yr -53.3%/yr DLB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 74.7% 30.2% 77.1% DLB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 47/100 66/100 24/100 DLB

Percentile Scorecard

CEVADLBSQNS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCEVADLBSQNS
Valuation 34 #62 of 94 87 #13 of 94 2 #92 of 94
Growth 75 #24 of 92 25 #69 of 92 1 #91 of 92
Profitability 28 #65 of 90 72 #26 of 90 7 #84 of 90
Financial Health 88 #13 of 99 60 #40 of 99 12 #87 of 99
Shareholder Returns 10 #66 of 73 85 #12 of 73 96 #4 of 73
Overall 47 66 24
  • CEVA ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • DLB ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • SQNS ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCEVADLBSQNSSPY
1 month -13.3%+7.0%-13.6% -0.2%
3 months -1.0%+19.5%-7.8% +3.9%
6 months +26.3%-0.3%-30.3% +8.2%
Year to date +45.8%-2.3%-44.8% +12.9%
1 year +10.5%-7.2%-66.8% +12.3%
3 years +84.0%-20.2%-96.5% +87.4%
3 years, per year +22.6%-7.3%-67.2% +23.3%
5 years -30.5%-28.2%-97.8% +67.9%
5 years, per year -7.0%-6.4%-53.3% +10.9%
10 years +4.4%+29.9%-98.7% +261.1%
10 years, per year +0.4%+2.7%-35.1% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCEVADLBSQNSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 74.7%30.2%77.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 75.6%31.5%80.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.430.542.71 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.14-0.24-0.87 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -68.0%-49.6%-98.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -37.3%-9.2%-68.3% -1.2%
52-week high $50.06$69.09$7.83 $779.14
52-week low $17.21$48.50$2.42 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCEVADLBSQNS
P/E now vs peer median -80.0xmedian 45.6x 26.1xmedian 45.6x -3.3xmedian 45.6x
P/S now vs peer median —median 7.7x 4.4xmedian 7.7x 40.5xmedian 7.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -18,030xmedian 29.0x 15.8xmedian 29.0x -6.7xmedian 29.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -830.4xmedian 40.6x 15.1xmedian 40.6x -26.2xmedian 40.6x
P/B now vs peer median 2.6xmedian 4.6x 2.3xmedian 4.6x 23.8xmedian 4.6x
PEG now vs peer median -2.66median 2.28 12.55median 2.28 0.21median 2.28

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCEVADLBSQNS
Revenue – $1.35B $24.46M
Gross profit – $1.19B $9.31M
Operating income – $239.10M -$150.39M
Net income -$10.98M $228.00M -$179.12M
Free cash flow -$1.06M $392.67M -$37.89M
R&D – $265.94M $30.14M
EPS (diluted) $-0.45 $2.39 $-0.74
Cash & equivalents $44.30M $669.39M $20.97M
Shares (diluted) 24.30M 94.52M 216.84M
Enterprise value $87.42M $3.31B $911.21M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCEVADLBSQNS
P/E -80.0x 26.1x -3.3x
P/FCF -830.4x 15.1x -26.2x
P/Operating cash flow 232.0x 13.5x -26.7x
P/S – 4.4x 40.5x
P/B 2.6x 2.3x 23.8x
P/Tangible book 2.6x 2.7x 29.6x
EV/EBITDA -18,030x 15.8x -6.7x
EV/EBIT -166.7x 21.9x -6.4x
EV/Revenue – 3.9x 39.5x
EV/FCF -627.6x 13.4x -25.5x
EV/Operating cash flow 175.3x 12.0x -26.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -2.66 12.55 0.21

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCEVADLBSQNS
Revenue growth (1Y) – 0.6% -34.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 1.7% 24.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – -0.5% -64.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 1.5% -39.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) – -15.1% -326.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -1.0% -154.3%
Net income growth (1Y) -8.9% -14.2% -432.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 29.3% 1.3% -101.2%
EPS growth (1Y) -5.9% -12.3% -197.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 30.1% 2.1% -16.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 71.4% -6.0% 11.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 41.3% 9.5% -293.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -372.4% -10.4% 16.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 47.3% 9.3% -60.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCEVADLBSQNS
Gross margin – 87.6% 38.1%
EBITDA margin – 24.5% -592.1%
Operating margin – 17.7% -614.8%
Pretax margin – 20.4% -657.2%
Net margin – 16.7% -660.3%
FCF margin – 29.0% -154.9%
Operating cash flow margin – 32.3% -151.8%
Return on equity -3.2% 8.7% -282.1%
Return on assets -2.8% 7.1% -133.6%
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed -1.1% 8.6% -172.1%
Asset turnover – 0.4x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.3x 1.9x 0.2x
Stock comp / revenue – 9.6% 8.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCEVADLBSQNS
Debt / assets – – –
Debt / equity – – –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 13.2% 17.9% 50.1%
Equity / assets 86.8% 82.1% 49.9%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 10.1x 3.2x 1.4x
Quick ratio 10.2x 3.1x 1.2x
Cash ratio 7.7x 1.6x 0.8x
Altman Z-score – 8.47 4.88

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCEVADLBSQNS
Dividend yield – 2.3% –
Net buyback yield -7.4% 3.5% 3.2%
Shareholder yield -7.4% 5.8% 3.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 58.9% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 34.2% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 8.6% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 9.6% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCEVADLBSQNS
Forward P/E 60.3xFY2026 14.0xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $0.52FY2026 $4.49FY2026 $-2.70FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +23.8%FY2026 +5.9%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +46.2% +4.7% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $117.61MFY2026 $1.50BFY2026 $37.49MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +7.3%FY2026 +11.1%FY2026 +38.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +26.4% -7.7% +45.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCEVADLBSQNS
Held by institutions 88.9% 100.0% 1.5%
Institutions holding 209 389 33
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.3% +5.8% -30.4%
Institutions buying 139 195 15
Institutions selling 49 148 5
Buyers to sellers 2.84 1.32 3.00

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CEVADLBSQNS
CEVA 1.00 0.09 0.30
DLB 0.09 1.00 -0.03
SQNS 0.30 -0.03 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CEVA, DLB and SQNS?

Dolby Laboratories (DLB) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ceva (CEVA) $882.69M, Dolby Laboratories (DLB) $5.91B, Sequans Communications (SQNS) $991.75M.

Which company is growing faster?

Dolby Laboratories (DLB) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Dolby Laboratories (DLB) +0.6%, Sequans Communications (SQNS) -34.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Dolby Laboratories (DLB) has the highest net margin (Dolby Laboratories (DLB) 16.7%, Sequans Communications (SQNS) -660.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ceva (CEVA) returned the most: Ceva (CEVA) +10.5%, Dolby Laboratories (DLB) -7.2%, Sequans Communications (SQNS) -66.8%. Over five years, Dolby Laboratories (DLB) compounded fastest (Ceva (CEVA) -7.0%/yr, Dolby Laboratories (DLB) -6.4%/yr, Sequans Communications (SQNS) -53.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Dolby Laboratories (DLB) 2.30%. Ceva (CEVA) and Sequans Communications (SQNS) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Dolby Laboratories (DLB) has been the steadiest (Ceva (CEVA) 74.7%, Dolby Laboratories (DLB) 30.2%, Sequans Communications (SQNS) 77.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CEVA, DLB and SQNS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Dolby Laboratories (DLB) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.