CETY vs FGPR vs MUSA Stock Comparison

Clean Energy Technologies, Ferrellgas Partners L P and Murphy USA Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MUSA Murphy USA Inc.
$516.78 -0.6% 1M +30.4% 1Y
Market cap
$9.84B
P/E
14.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$23.26B
Div. yield
–
Convenience Stores Consumer Staples
4 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Murphy USA leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Murphy USA 4, Ferrellgas Partners L P 4, Clean Energy Technologies 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCETYFGPRMUSALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $11.58M $120.75M $9.84B MUSA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -1.7x 1.6x 14.8x FGPR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 14.5x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +89.4% -3.6% +20.2% CETY
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -258.7% 4.1% — FGPR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -30.7% 38.5% — FGPR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -2.8x 4.9x — CETY
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -64.4% +10.3% +30.4% MUSA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -3.4%/yr +26.0%/yr MUSA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 141.3% 36.9% 39.6% FGPR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 18/100 44/100 51/100 MUSA

Percentile Scorecard

CETYFGPRMUSA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCETYFGPRMUSA
Valuation 15 #52 of 61 64 #9 of 23 54 #19 of 40
Growth 18 #48 of 58 33 #13 of 19 81 #8 of 38
Profitability 15 #47 of 55 71 #6 of 18 94 #3 of 36
Financial Health 26 #53 of 71 9 #22 of 24 13 #35 of 40
Shareholder Returns – – 11 #25 of 28
Overall 18 44 51
  • CETY ranked among 71 companies in Clean Energy Equipment
  • FGPR ranked among 25 companies in Refining and Marketing
  • MUSA ranked among 41 companies in Staples Retail

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCETYFGPRMUSASPY
1 month -12.0%-7.6%-0.6% +0.9%
3 months -8.3%-11.4%-16.2% +5.9%
6 months +14.3%-21.8%+0.5% +8.5%
Year to date +20.5%+9.8%+28.1% +13.3%
1 year -64.4%+10.3%+30.4% +12.4%
3 years -96.2%+160.8%+42.0% +88.1%
3 years, per year -66.4%+37.7%+12.4% +23.5%
5 years —-15.8%+217.1% +68.2%
5 years, per year —-3.4%+26.0% +11.0%
10 years ——+646.7% +263.4%
10 years, per year ——+22.3% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureCETYFGPRMUSASPY
Volatility, 1Y 141.3%36.9%39.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 124.2%33.8%40.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.84-0.07-0.68 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.460.280.77 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -99.4%-73.4%-35.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -65.1%-25.7%-17.1% -0.9%
52-week high $2.52$27.20$623.43 $779.14
52-week low $0.46$17.07$356.57 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCETYFGPRMUSA
P/E now vs peer median -1.6xmedian 29.4x 1.6xmedian 8.9x 14.4xmedian 21.7x
P/S now vs peer median 4.1xmedian 2.6x 0.1xmedian 0.3x 0.4xmedian 0.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -12.2xmedian 18.4x 5.3xmedian 7.0x —median 9.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median -1.3xmedian 24.4x 1.4xmedian 8.5x 17.2xmedian 17.1x
P/B now vs peer median 1.8xmedian 1.8x -0.1xmedian 1.7x 12.0xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median 0.27median 1.07 -0.05median 0.32 1.02median 1.02

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCETYFGPRMUSA
Revenue $2.64M $1.86B $23.26B
Gross profit -$36.28K $1.03B –
Operating income -$2.89M $196.22M $980.10M
Net income -$6.83M $76.61M $663.30M
Free cash flow -$8.05M $86.92M –
EPS (diluted) $-0.56 $9.30 $35.75
Cash & equivalents $19.74K $73.41M $161.80M
Total debt $11.36M $5.98B –
Shares (diluted) 12.17M 8.22M 18.55M
Enterprise value $9.85M -$197.77M $9.84B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCETYFGPRMUSA
P/E -1.6x 1.6x 14.4x
P/FCF -1.3x 1.4x 17.2x
P/Operating cash flow -1.3x 0.7x 8.3x
P/S 4.1x 0.1x 0.4x
P/B 1.8x -0.1x 12.0x
P/Tangible book 1.9x -0.1x 14.5x
EV/EBITDA -12.2x 5.3x –
EV/EBIT -4.8x 8.1x –
EV/Revenue 5.3x 0.9x 0.4x
EV/FCF -1.7x 18.3x –
EV/Operating cash flow -1.7x 9.3x 8.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.27 -0.05 1.02

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCETYFGPRMUSA
Revenue growth (1Y) 89.4% -3.6% 20.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -8.2% -3.5% 2.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -103.4% 0.8% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -27.5% 1.0% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -8.2% 106.9% 38.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -12.8% -7.0% 7.8%
Net income growth (1Y) -69.6% 847.0% 40.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -79.3% -19.6% 8.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 48.7% 575.6% 45.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -5.7% -32.4% 14.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -130.6% -8.5% 40.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -30.4% -1.0% 16.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -130.6% -25.5% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -30.4% 3.0% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCETYFGPRMUSA
Gross margin -1.4% 55.1% –
EBITDA margin -43.2% 16.1% –
Operating margin -109.4% 10.5% –
Pretax margin -258.7% 4.2% –
Net margin -258.7% 4.1% –
FCF margin -304.9% 4.7% –
Operating cash flow margin -304.9% 9.1% 4.9%
Return on equity -106.7% – 84.1%
Return on assets -49.9% 5.1% 12.9%
Return on invested capital -30.7% 38.5% –
Return on capital employed -47.3% 17.0% –
Asset turnover 0.2x 1.2x 4.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.2x 2.2x 1.7x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.2% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCETYFGPRMUSA
Debt / assets 22.9% 105.2% –
Debt / equity 0.5x -1.4x –
Net debt / EBITDA -2.8x 4.9x –
Debt / FCF -0.4x 17.8x –
Liabilities / assets 57.0% 172.8% 84.7%
Equity / assets 43.0% -72.8% 15.3%
Interest coverage -0.7x 1.7x –
Current ratio 1.0x 1.1x 0.9x
Quick ratio 0.3x 0.7x –
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.2x –
Altman Z-score -3.41 1.76 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCETYFGPRMUSA
Dividend yield – – 0.5%
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – – 0.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCETYFGPRMUSA
Forward P/E – – 14.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – – $35.60FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – +43.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – – -7.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year – – $22.85BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – – +17.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – – -5.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCETYFGPRMUSA
Held by institutions – 0.0% 83.0%
Institutions holding – 1 606
Change in shares held, QoQ – – -2.2%
Institutions buying – 0 310
Institutions selling – 0 190
Buyers to sellers – – 1.63

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CETYFGPRMUSA
CETY 1.00 -0.07 0.06
FGPR -0.07 1.00 -0.01
MUSA 0.06 -0.01 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CETY, FGPR and MUSA?

Murphy USA (MUSA) is the largest by market capitalisation: Clean Energy Technologies (CETY) $11.58M, Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) $120.75M, Murphy USA (MUSA) $9.84B.

Which stock is cheaper, CETY, FGPR and MUSA?

Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Clean Energy Technologies (CETY) -1.7x, Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) 1.6x, Murphy USA (MUSA) 14.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Clean Energy Technologies (CETY) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Clean Energy Technologies (CETY) +89.4%, Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) -3.6%, Murphy USA (MUSA) +20.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) has the highest net margin (Clean Energy Technologies (CETY) -258.7%, Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) 4.1%). On return on invested capital, Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) leads (Clean Energy Technologies (CETY) -30.7%, Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) 38.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Murphy USA (MUSA) returned the most: Clean Energy Technologies (CETY) -64.4%, Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) +10.3%, Murphy USA (MUSA) +30.4%. Over five years, Murphy USA (MUSA) compounded fastest (Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) -3.4%/yr, Murphy USA (MUSA) +26.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) has been the steadiest (Clean Energy Technologies (CETY) 141.3%, Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) 36.9%, Murphy USA (MUSA) 39.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CETY, FGPR and MUSA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Murphy USA (MUSA) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.