CEPL vs CMI vs HUBB Stock Comparison

Capstone Energy Plus, Cummins and Hubbell Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CMI Cummins Inc
$530.34 +1.0% 1M +26.0% 1Y
Market cap
$73.00B
P/E
26.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$34.71B
Div. yield
–
Heavy Equipment Industrials
4 wins
HUBB Hubbell Inc
$434.48 -6.8% 1M +0.1% 1Y
Market cap
$23.05B
P/E
25.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$6.59B
Div. yield
–
Electrical Equipment Industrials
4 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Cummins leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Cummins 4, Hubbell 4, Capstone Energy Plus 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCEPLCMIHUBBLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $105.07M $73.00B $23.05B CMI
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 29.4x 26.9x 25.4x HUBB
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 16.9x 21.6x CMI
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +5.4% +2.9% +16.0% HUBB
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 3.5% 7.8% — CMI
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 13.6% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.7x 0.7x — CEPL
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months — +26.0% +0.1% CMI
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +16.9%/yr +17.1%/yr HUBB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 113.2% 37.1% 32.6% HUBB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 76/100 59/100 50/100 CEPL

Percentile Scorecard

CEPLCMIHUBB

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCEPLCMIHUBB
Valuation 93 #5 of 61 50 #103 of 203 31 #140 of 203
Growth 91 #6 of 58 52 #90 of 188 73 #51 of 188
Profitability 85 #9 of 55 71 #54 of 183 75 #46 of 183
Financial Health 23 #55 of 71 52 #104 of 217 15 #184 of 217
Shareholder Returns 86 #5 of 30 69 #48 of 153 55 #69 of 153
Overall 76 59 50
  • CEPL ranked among 71 companies in Clean Energy Equipment
  • CMI ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • HUBB ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCEPLCMIHUBBSPY
1 month -35.5%+1.0%-6.8% -0.2%
3 months -59.1%-17.3%-10.3% +3.9%
6 months —-17.5%-20.2% +8.2%
Year to date —+3.9%-2.2% +12.9%
1 year —+26.0%+0.1% +12.3%
3 years —+146.4%+54.6% +87.4%
3 years, per year —+35.1%+15.6% +23.3%
5 years —+118.5%+119.8% +67.9%
5 years, per year —+16.9%+17.1% +10.9%
10 years —+320.0%+314.1% +261.1%
10 years, per year —+15.4%+15.3% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCEPLCMIHUBBSPY
Volatility, 1Y 113.2%37.1%32.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 121.1%38.0%35.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.671.641.20 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y —0.700.00 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -77.8%-30.8%-33.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -74.4%-27.1%-22.1% -1.2%
52-week high $11.88$727.59$557.85 $779.14
52-week low $2.64$414.30$407.36 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCEPLCMIHUBB
P/E now vs peer median 29.2xmedian 27.2x 26.9xmedian 25.2x 25.3xmedian 25.2x
P/S now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 2.4x 2.1xmedian 1.9x 3.5xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 9.8xmedian 18.4x 15.2xmedian 14.0x —median 14.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 34.4xmedian 28.6x 21.7xmedian 21.7x 26.9xmedian 21.7x
P/B now vs peer median -2.2xmedian 1.7x 5.3xmedian 2.3x 5.6xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 1.06median 0.79 8.40median 1.32 2.51median 1.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCEPLCMIHUBB
Revenue $103.06M $34.71B $6.59B
Gross profit $35.07M $8.79B $2.33B
Operating income $4.53M $3.89B $1.33B
Net income $3.56M $2.83B –
Free cash flow $2.87M $3.37B –
R&D $4.03M $1.44B –
EPS (diluted) $0.10 $19.60 $17.12
Cash & equivalents $32.30M $3.18B $334.50M
Total debt $109.19M $7.35B –
Shares (diluted) 34.34M 138.50M 53.10M
Enterprise value $20.97M $69.08B $23.05B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCEPLCMIHUBB
P/E 29.2x 26.9x 25.3x
P/FCF 34.4x 21.7x 26.9x
P/Operating cash flow 22.1x 15.7x 20.7x
P/S 1.0x 2.1x 3.5x
P/B -2.2x 5.3x 5.6x
P/Tangible book -2.0x 6.2x 23.6x
EV/EBITDA 9.8x 15.2x –
EV/EBIT 20.3x 19.6x –
EV/Revenue 0.9x 2.2x 3.5x
EV/FCF 32.0x 22.7x –
EV/Operating cash flow 20.6x 16.4x 20.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.06 8.40 2.51

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCEPLCMIHUBB
Revenue growth (1Y) 5.4% 2.9% 16.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 9.3% 2.5% 7.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 29.5% 1.7% 17.1%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 52.0% 4.8% 9.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) 305.8% -6.0% 15.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 30.7% 4.1% 10.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 190.1% -7.8% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 28.8% 2.9% –
EPS growth (1Y) 151.0% -7.7% 6.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 27.5% 3.2% 10.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 11.9% 63.4% 9.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 35.5% 28.8% 12.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -8.6% 103.8% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 29.3% 45.3% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCEPLCMIHUBB
Gross margin 34.0% 25.3% –
EBITDA margin 9.1% 14.4% –
Operating margin 4.4% 11.2% –
Pretax margin 3.4% 11.1% –
Net margin 3.5% 7.8% –
FCF margin 2.8% 9.7% –
Operating cash flow margin 4.3% 13.4% 16.8%
Return on equity – 20.7% 22.8%
Return on assets 3.1% 8.1% 7.7%
Return on invested capital – 13.6% –
Return on capital employed 12.2% 16.0% –
Asset turnover 0.9x 1.0x 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.3x 1.6x –
Stock comp / revenue 0.8% – 0.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCEPLCMIHUBB
Debt / assets 22.1% 20.6% –
Debt / equity -0.6x 0.5x –
Net debt / EBITDA -0.7x 0.7x –
Debt / FCF 8.8x 2.2x –
Liabilities / assets 139.4% 61.0% 65.4%
Equity / assets -39.4% 39.0% 34.6%
Interest coverage 1.1x 12.1x –
Current ratio 1.0x 1.7x 1.5x
Quick ratio 0.6x 1.0x –
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.4x –
Altman Z-score -10.48 4.54 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCEPLCMIHUBB
Dividend yield – 1.5% 1.3%
Net buyback yield 0.4% 0.6% –
Shareholder yield 0.4% 2.2% 1.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCEPLCMIHUBB
Forward P/E – 16.9xFY2026 21.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.01FY2026 $31.39FY2026 $20.07FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +31.9%FY2026 +10.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +14.7% +21.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $115.36MFY2026 $35.38BFY2026 $7.32BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +8.8%FY2026 +5.1%FY2026 +25.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +28.2% +11.3% +9.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCEPLCMIHUBB
Held by institutions – 85.4% 96.1%
Institutions holding – 2,106 1,015
Change in shares held, QoQ – +1.0% -0.4%
Institutions buying – 1,049 511
Institutions selling – 728 318
Buyers to sellers – 1.44 1.61

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CEPLCMIHUBB
CEPL 1.00 0.38 0.15
CMI 0.38 1.00 0.53
HUBB 0.15 0.53 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CEPL, CMI and HUBB?

Cummins (CMI) is the largest by market capitalisation: Capstone Energy Plus (CEPL) $105.07M, Cummins (CMI) $73.00B, Hubbell (HUBB) $23.05B.

Which stock is cheaper, CEPL, CMI and HUBB?

Hubbell (HUBB) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Capstone Energy Plus (CEPL) 29.4x, Cummins (CMI) 26.9x, Hubbell (HUBB) 25.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Cummins (CMI) is cheapest (Cummins (CMI) 16.9x, Hubbell (HUBB) 21.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Hubbell (HUBB) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Capstone Energy Plus (CEPL) +5.4%, Cummins (CMI) +2.9%, Hubbell (HUBB) +16.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Cummins (CMI) has the highest net margin (Capstone Energy Plus (CEPL) 3.5%, Cummins (CMI) 7.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Cummins (CMI) returned the most: Cummins (CMI) +26.0%, Hubbell (HUBB) +0.1%. Over five years, Hubbell (HUBB) compounded fastest (Cummins (CMI) +16.9%/yr, Hubbell (HUBB) +17.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Hubbell (HUBB) has been the steadiest (Capstone Energy Plus (CEPL) 113.2%, Cummins (CMI) 37.1%, Hubbell (HUBB) 32.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CEPL, CMI and HUBB?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Cummins (CMI) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.