CEPF vs PJT vs LAZ Stock Comparison

Cantor Equity Partners IV, PJT Partners and Lazard Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
PJT PJT Partners Inc.
$148.92 +0.0% 1M -18.2% 1Y
Market cap
$5.66B
P/E
20.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.89B
Div. yield
0.67%
Investment Banking Financial Services
7 wins
LAZ Lazard, Inc.
$38.43 +7.5% 1M -21.6% 1Y
Market cap
$4.22B
P/E
21.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.38B
Div. yield
5.20%
Investment Banking Financial Services
1 win

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

PJT Partners leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (PJT Partners 7, Cantor Equity Partners IV 2, Lazard 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCEPFPJTLAZLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $463.05M $5.66B $4.22B PJT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 45.9x 20.0x 21.0x PJT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 19.6x 29.8x PJT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +22.9% +9.0% PJT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 10.6% 5.5% PJT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 6.2% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 0.5x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.67% 5.20% LAZ
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -3.1% -18.2% -21.6% CEPF
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +12.7%/yr -4.7%/yr PJT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 4.1% 34.6% 43.2% CEPF
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 70/100 63/100 PJT

Percentile Scorecard

CEPFPJTLAZ

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCEPFPJTLAZ
Valuation – 79 #21 of 96 93 #8 of 96
Growth – 75 #17 of 65 69 #21 of 65
Profitability – 84 #11 of 65 70 #20 of 65
Financial Health 58 #39 of 92 – 42 #54 of 92
Shareholder Returns – 41 #23 of 38 43 #22 of 38
Overall – 70 63
  • CEPF ranked among 110 companies in Capital Markets
  • PJT ranked among 110 companies in Capital Markets
  • LAZ ranked among 110 companies in Capital Markets

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCEPFPJTLAZSPY
1 month -0.1%+0.0%+7.5% +0.9%
3 months -1.0%-9.8%-5.4% +5.9%
6 months +0.4%-2.1%-19.1% +8.5%
Year to date +0.1%-10.9%-20.9% +13.3%
1 year -3.1%-18.2%-21.6% +12.4%
3 years —+105.8%+33.9% +88.1%
3 years, per year —+27.2%+10.2% +23.5%
5 years —+82.1%-21.6% +68.2%
5 years, per year —+12.7%-4.7% +11.0%
10 years —+441.7%+3.8% +263.4%
10 years, per year —+18.4%+0.4% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureCEPFPJTLAZSPY
Volatility, 1Y 4.1%34.6%43.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 4.5%37.4%48.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.030.941.89 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.77-0.53-0.50 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -4.5%-35.1%-46.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -3.1%-22.2%-32.6% -0.9%
52-week high $10.62$191.42$57.00 $779.14
52-week low $10.14$129.05$34.67 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCEPFPJTLAZ
P/E now vs peer median 45.9xmedian 30.1x 20.0xmedian 30.1x 21.0xmedian 30.1x
P/S now vs peer median —median 3.0x 3.0xmedian 3.0x 1.2xmedian 3.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 14.1x 13.2xmedian 14.1x 5.8xmedian 14.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 15.8x 8.5xmedian 15.8x 6.2xmedian 15.8x
P/B now vs peer median -2,714xmedian 2.4x 5.8xmedian 2.4x 4.4xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.54 0.68median 0.54 0.39median 0.54

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCEPFPJTLAZ
Revenue – $1.89B $3.38B
Operating income -$440.90K – $266.88M
Net income $10.08M $344.68M $198.53M
Free cash flow – $661.83M $684.97M
EPS (diluted) $0.18 $7.00 $1.72
Cash & equivalents $25.00K $235.54M $1.26B
Total debt – – $1.69B
Shares (diluted) 57.15M 28.51M 107.28M
Enterprise value $463.02M $4.85B -$525.66M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCEPFPJTLAZ
P/E 45.9x 20.0x 21.0x
P/FCF – 8.5x 6.2x
P/Operating cash flow – 7.9x 6.0x
P/S – 3.0x 1.2x
P/B -2,714x 5.8x 4.4x
P/Tangible book -2,714x 5.8x 4.4x
EV/EBITDA – 13.2x 5.8x
EV/EBIT -1,051x 13.7x 17.4x
EV/Revenue – 2.9x 1.4x
EV/FCF – 8.2x 6.8x
EV/Operating cash flow – 7.6x 6.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.68 0.39

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCEPFPJTLAZ
Revenue growth (1Y) – 22.9% 9.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 19.9% 10.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – -23.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – 75.3%
Net income growth (1Y) – 28.8% -27.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 30.8% 64.1%
EPS growth (1Y) – 89.6% -31.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 29.4% 54.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 45.3% 45.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 34.5% 72.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 39.4% 55.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 31.9% 94.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCEPFPJTLAZ
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – 21.8% 23.9%
Operating margin – – 7.9%
Pretax margin – 21.0% 5.2%
Net margin – 10.6% 5.5%
FCF margin – 35.1% 20.3%
Operating cash flow margin – 37.8% 20.7%
Return on equity – 36.0% 21.4%
Return on assets 2.2% 20.8% 4.4%
Return on invested capital – – 6.2%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover – 1.1x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 2.1x 3.5x
Stock comp / revenue – 12.5% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCEPFPJTLAZ
Debt / assets 0.1% – 37.2%
Debt / equity -1.8x – 1.8x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 0.5x
Debt / FCF – – 2.5x
Liabilities / assets 100.0% 44.0% 79.1%
Equity / assets 0.0% 56.0% 20.9%
Interest coverage – – 3.0x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCEPFPJTLAZ
Dividend yield – 0.7% 5.2%
Net buyback yield – 2.1% 3.2%
Shareholder yield – 2.8% 8.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 96.9%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 28.1%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 4.3%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 3.7%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCEPFPJTLAZ
Forward P/E – 19.6xFY2026 29.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $7.61FY2026 $1.29FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +9.0%FY2026 -47.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +12.1% +158.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $1.95BFY2026 $3.40BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +13.9%FY2026 +9.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +3.5% +10.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCEPFPJTLAZ
Held by institutions 89.9% 59.4% 100.0%
Institutions holding 91 415 346
Change in shares held, QoQ -2.6% +10.0% +10.6%
Institutions buying 24 221 185
Institutions selling 10 103 106
Buyers to sellers 2.40 2.15 1.75

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CEPFPJTLAZ
CEPF 1.00 0.05 0.11
PJT 0.05 1.00 0.62
LAZ 0.11 0.62 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CEPF, PJT and LAZ?

PJT Partners (PJT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Cantor Equity Partners IV (CEPF) $463.05M, PJT Partners (PJT) $5.66B, Lazard (LAZ) $4.22B.

Which stock is cheaper, CEPF, PJT and LAZ?

PJT Partners (PJT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Cantor Equity Partners IV (CEPF) 45.9x, PJT Partners (PJT) 20.0x, Lazard (LAZ) 21.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, PJT Partners (PJT) is cheapest (PJT Partners (PJT) 19.6x, Lazard (LAZ) 29.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

PJT Partners (PJT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: PJT Partners (PJT) +22.9%, Lazard (LAZ) +9.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

PJT Partners (PJT) has the highest net margin (PJT Partners (PJT) 10.6%, Lazard (LAZ) 5.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Cantor Equity Partners IV (CEPF) returned the most: Cantor Equity Partners IV (CEPF) -3.1%, PJT Partners (PJT) -18.2%, Lazard (LAZ) -21.6%. Over five years, PJT Partners (PJT) compounded fastest (PJT Partners (PJT) +12.7%/yr, Lazard (LAZ) -4.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Lazard (LAZ) has the highest dividend yield: PJT Partners (PJT) 0.67%, Lazard (LAZ) 5.20%. Cantor Equity Partners IV (CEPF) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Cantor Equity Partners IV (CEPF) has been the steadiest (Cantor Equity Partners IV (CEPF) 4.1%, PJT Partners (PJT) 34.6%, Lazard (LAZ) 43.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CEPF, PJT and LAZ?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, PJT Partners (PJT) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.