CDRO vs FLUT vs LAWIL Stock Comparison

Codere Online Luxembourg, Flutter Entertainment and Light & Wonder Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FLUT Flutter Entertainment plc
$80.18 -4.1% 1M -67.1% 1Y
Market cap
$13.71B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$17.16B
Div. yield
–
Sports Betting Consumer Discretionary
2 wins
LAWIL Light & Wonder, Inc.
$92.45 +10.1% 1M
Market cap
$7.12B
P/E
26.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.35B
Div. yield
–
Casinos Consumer Discretionary
5 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Light & Wonder leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Light & Wonder 5, Codere Online Luxembourg 3, Flutter Entertainment 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCDROFLUTLAWILLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $434.48M $13.71B $7.12B FLUT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — -18.2x 26.4x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 27.9x 18.2x 12.5x LAWIL
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +15.2% +4.8% FLUT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — -4.4% 8.1% LAWIL
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -3.0% 9.5% LAWIL
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 10.1x 4.5x LAWIL
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +40.4% -67.1% — CDRO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -1.6%/yr -16.4%/yr — CDRO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 31.7% 51.1% — CDRO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 42/100 64/100 LAWIL

Percentile Scorecard

CDROFLUTLAWIL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCDROFLUTLAWIL
Valuation – 54 #21 of 44 49 #23 of 44
Growth – 21 #34 of 43 67 #15 of 43
Profitability – 33 #28 of 41 85 #7 of 41
Financial Health 80 #10 of 47 39 #29 of 47 35 #31 of 47
Shareholder Returns – 63 #11 of 28 85 #5 of 28
Overall – 42 64
  • CDRO ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • FLUT ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • LAWIL ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCDROFLUTLAWILSPY
1 month -8.0%-4.1%+10.1% -0.8%
3 months -1.9%-24.2%+12.7% +3.5%
6 months +3.5%-27.7%-9.4% +7.0%
Year to date +14.7%-62.7%— +12.2%
1 year +40.4%-67.1%— +13.0%
3 years +204.0%-48.3%— +86.3%
3 years, per year +44.9%-19.7%— +23.1%
5 years -7.7%-59.1%— +68.6%
5 years, per year -1.6%-16.4%— +11.0%
10 years —-30.0%— +258.0%
10 years, per year —-3.5%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureCDROFLUTLAWILSPY
Volatility, 1Y 31.7%51.1%— 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 29.5%57.7%— 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.450.78— 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.27-1.31— 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -79.0%-75.9%-19.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -9.7%-67.2%-9.4% -1.8%
52-week high $10.20$244.54$102.00 $779.14
52-week low $5.43$74.27$82.00 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCDROFLUTLAWIL
P/E now vs peer median —median 17.1x -18.6xmedian 17.1x 26.4xmedian 17.1x
P/S now vs peer median —median 1.9x 0.8xmedian 1.9x 2.1xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 10.9x 23.7xmedian 10.9x 10.9xmedian 10.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 11.4x 11.2xmedian 11.4x 12.8xmedian 11.4x
P/B now vs peer median 9.5xmedian 2.5x 1.5xmedian 2.5x 23.6xmedian 2.5x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.57 —median 0.57 -4.35median 0.57

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCDROFLUTLAWIL
Revenue – $17.16B $3.35B
Gross profit – $7.29B $2.49B
Operating income – -$641.00M $665.00M
Net income – -$866.00M $271.00M
Free cash flow – $1.24B $555.00M
R&D – $1.08B $250.00M
EPS (diluted) – $-4.31 $3.45
Cash & equivalents $71.43M $1.56B $148.00M
Total debt – $11.98B $20.38B
Shares (diluted) 45.89M 175.00M 78.50M
Enterprise value $163.28M $7.08B $6.43B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCDROFLUTLAWIL
P/E – -18.6x 26.4x
P/FCF – 11.2x 12.8x
P/Operating cash flow – 10.5x 8.1x
P/S – 0.8x 2.1x
P/B 9.5x 1.5x 23.6x
P/Tangible book 9.5x 5.6x -16.8x
EV/EBITDA – 23.7x 10.9x
EV/EBIT – -38.0x 18.2x
EV/Revenue – 1.4x 3.6x
EV/FCF – 19.6x 21.8x
EV/Operating cash flow – 18.3x 13.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – -4.35

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCDROFLUTLAWIL
Revenue growth (1Y) – 15.2% 4.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – 7.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 4.2% 8.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 9.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) – -164.9% -4.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – 18.3%
Net income growth (1Y) – -309.2% -22.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – – -12.6%
EPS growth (1Y) – -310.7% -14.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – -6.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -10.7% 44.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 75.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -7.2% 67.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 46.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCDROFLUTLAWIL
Gross margin – 42.5% 74.4%
EBITDA margin – 6.0% 33.0%
Operating margin – -3.7% 19.9%
Pretax margin – -4.3% 10.4%
Net margin – -4.4% 8.1%
FCF margin – 7.2% 16.6%
Operating cash flow margin – 7.8% 26.4%
Return on equity – -9.5% 88.4%
Return on assets – -3.1% 4.3%
Return on invested capital – -3.0% 9.5%
Return on capital employed – -2.8% 11.8%
Asset turnover – 0.6x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – -1.5x 3.3x
Stock comp / revenue – 1.4% 3.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCDROFLUTLAWIL
Debt / assets – 42.5% 80.6%
Debt / equity – 1.3x 17.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – 10.1x 4.5x
Debt / FCF – 9.6x 9.2x
Liabilities / assets 61.1% 68.2% 95.3%
Equity / assets 38.9% 31.8% 4.7%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 1.5x 0.9x 1.7x
Quick ratio 1.5x 0.4x 1.1x
Cash ratio 1.3x 0.3x 0.2x
Altman Z-score – 1.33 1.75

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCDROFLUTLAWIL
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – 5.7% 10.9%
Shareholder yield – 5.7% 10.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCDROFLUTLAWIL
Forward P/E 27.9xFY2026 18.2xFY2026 12.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.33FY2026 $4.40FY2026 $7.40FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -44.6%FY2026 +10.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +84.8% +49.8% +29.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $304.93MFY2026 $16.91BFY2026 $3.61BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +15.9%FY2026 +3.2%FY2026 +8.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -4.1% +18.3% -5.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCDROFLUTLAWIL
Held by institutions 12.2% – –
Institutions holding 20 – –
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.4% – –
Institutions buying 10 – –
Institutions selling 4 – –
Buyers to sellers 2.50 – –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CDROFLUTLAWIL
CDRO 1.00 0.18 –
FLUT 0.18 1.00 –
LAWIL – – –

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CDRO, FLUT and LAWIL?

Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Codere Online Luxembourg (CDRO) $434.48M, Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) $13.71B, Light & Wonder (LAWIL) $7.12B.

Which company is growing faster?

Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) +15.2%, Light & Wonder (LAWIL) +4.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Light & Wonder (LAWIL) has the highest net margin (Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) -4.4%, Light & Wonder (LAWIL) 8.1%). On return on invested capital, Light & Wonder (LAWIL) leads (Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) -3.0%, Light & Wonder (LAWIL) 9.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Codere Online Luxembourg (CDRO) returned the most: Codere Online Luxembourg (CDRO) +40.4%, Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) -67.1%. Over five years, Codere Online Luxembourg (CDRO) compounded fastest (Codere Online Luxembourg (CDRO) -1.6%/yr, Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) -16.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Codere Online Luxembourg (CDRO) has been the steadiest (Codere Online Luxembourg (CDRO) 31.7%, Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) 51.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CDRO, FLUT and LAWIL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Light & Wonder (LAWIL) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.