CCSI vs SANG vs TWLO Stock Comparison

Consensus Cloud Solutions, Sangoma Technologies and Twilio Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
SANG Sangoma Technologies Corp
$4.66 +29.8% 1M -7.9% 1Y
Market cap
$155.59M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$203.08M
Div. yield
–
Communications Platforms Technology
2 wins
TWLO Twilio Inc
$253.83 -11.6% 1M +123.7% 1Y
Market cap
$36.76B
P/E
32.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.57B
Div. yield
–
Communications Platforms Technology
6 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Twilio leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Twilio 6, Consensus Cloud Solutions 3, Sangoma Technologies 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCCSISANGTWLOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $686.22M $155.59M $36.76B TWLO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 7.2x -2.0x 32.0x CCSI
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 6.7x — 44.5x CCSI
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +1.5% -14.2% +17.8% TWLO
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 26.7% -39.0% 20.6% CCSI
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 19.0% 54.0% 3.1% SANG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.7x 0.2x -3.2x TWLO
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +37.2% -7.9% +123.7% TWLO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -10.1%/yr -26.7%/yr -2.7%/yr TWLO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 53.4% 51.2% 62.3% SANG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 56/100 42/100 57/100 TWLO

Percentile Scorecard

CCSISANGTWLO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCCSISANGTWLO
Valuation 79 #7 of 29 93 #3 of 29 25 #22 of 29
Growth 15 #23 of 27 0 #27 of 27 96 #2 of 27
Profitability 92 #3 of 26 48 #14 of 26 40 #16 of 26
Financial Health 27 #23 of 31 50 #16 of 31 87 #5 of 31
Shareholder Returns 69 #6 of 17 19 #14 of 17 38 #11 of 17
Overall 56 42 57
  • CCSI ranked among 32 companies in Workplace Software
  • SANG ranked among 32 companies in Workplace Software
  • TWLO ranked among 32 companies in Workplace Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCCSISANGTWLOSPY
1 month +8.2%+29.8%-11.6% +0.9%
3 months +1.5%+13.7%+34.9% +5.9%
6 months +48.1%+9.9%+80.1% +8.5%
Year to date +70.8%-8.1%+78.5% +13.3%
1 year +37.2%-7.9%+123.7% +12.4%
3 years +82.6%+63.5%+405.7% +88.1%
3 years, per year +22.2%+17.8%+71.7% +23.5%
5 years -41.1%-78.8%-12.9% +68.2%
5 years, per year -10.1%-26.7%-2.7% +11.0%
10 years —+121.9%+616.6% +263.4%
10 years, per year —+8.3%+21.8% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureCCSISANGTWLOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 53.4%51.2%62.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 53.9%42.2%52.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.220.191.35 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.70-0.151.99 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -82.1%-89.2%-86.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -6.5%-13.7%-16.2% -0.9%
52-week high $39.85$5.40$302.99 $779.14
52-week low $20.24$3.42$108.49 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCCSISANGTWLO
P/E now vs peer median 7.2xmedian 31.0x -2.0xmedian 31.0x 33.8xmedian 31.0x
P/S now vs peer median 1.9xmedian 2.5x 0.8xmedian 2.5x 7.0xmedian 2.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 6.7xmedian 11.2x 1.7xmedian 11.2x 71.9xmedian 11.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 5.9xmedian 15.6x 7.1xmedian 15.6x 37.1xmedian 15.6x
P/B now vs peer median 16.4xmedian 3.2x 0.9xmedian 3.2x 4.3xmedian 3.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.60median 0.74 0.05median 0.74 0.74median 0.74

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCCSISANGTWLO
Revenue $354.67M $203.08M $5.57B
Gross profit $284.57M $143.68M $2.70B
Operating income $148.27M $66.76M $289.94M
Net income $94.65M -$81.09M $1.15B
Free cash flow $115.67M $21.92M $1.05B
R&D $8.30M $42.90M $1.06B
EPS (diluted) $4.93 $-2.38 $7.19
Cash & equivalents $98.90M $10.43M $823.26M
Total debt $555.29M $89.10M $993.16M
Shares (diluted) 19.18M 33.24M 159.71M
Enterprise value $322.69M $97.09M $26.83B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCCSISANGTWLO
P/E 7.2x -2.0x 33.8x
P/FCF 5.9x 7.1x 37.1x
P/Operating cash flow 4.7x 6.6x 36.8x
P/S 1.9x 0.8x 7.0x
P/B 16.4x 0.9x 4.3x
P/Tangible book 505.3x 1.3x 4.4x
EV/EBITDA 6.7x 1.7x 71.9x
EV/EBIT 7.7x 2.6x 128.7x
EV/Revenue 3.2x 0.8x 6.7x
EV/FCF 9.9x 7.9x 35.5x
EV/Operating cash flow 7.8x 7.3x 35.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.60 0.05 0.74

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCCSISANGTWLO
Revenue growth (1Y) 1.5% -14.2% 17.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -1.1% -7.0% 11.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 2.2% -11.2% 14.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -1.8% -6.0% 11.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) -0.1% -18.1% 320.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 0.6% -18.7% 31.4%
Net income growth (1Y) 16.7% -1,519% 5,574%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 11.2% -40.8% 43.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 18.6% -1,493% 5,574%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 12.1% -39.6% 45.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 19.7% -43.3% 35.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 20.7% -9.9% 96.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 27.4% -50.4% 35.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 34.0% -8.2% 89.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCCSISANGTWLO
Gross margin 80.2% 70.7% 48.5%
EBITDA margin 47.8% 50.3% 9.3%
Operating margin 41.8% 32.9% 5.2%
Pretax margin 35.3% -41.7% 3.1%
Net margin 26.7% -39.0% 20.6%
FCF margin 32.6% 10.8% 18.8%
Operating cash flow margin 41.1% 11.7% 19.0%
Return on equity 297.8% -87.1% 13.7%
Return on assets 13.8% – 11.3%
Return on invested capital 19.0% 54.0% 3.1%
Return on capital employed 24.0% – 3.1%
Asset turnover 0.5x – 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.5x -0.3x 0.9x
Stock comp / revenue 5.4% 1.2% 10.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCCSISANGTWLO
Debt / assets 79.7% 11.6% 9.2%
Debt / equity 13.4x 0.2x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.7x 0.2x -3.2x
Debt / FCF 4.8x 1.2x 0.9x
Liabilities / assets 94.0% 25.8% 17.2%
Equity / assets 6.0% 74.2% 82.8%
Interest coverage 4.4x 33.0x –
Current ratio 1.9x 0.8x 4.6x
Quick ratio 1.8x 0.5x 4.2x
Cash ratio 1.4x 0.2x 3.3x
Altman Z-score 2.05 1.93 12.53

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCCSISANGTWLO
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield 5.2% -0.1% 2.1%
Shareholder yield 5.2% -0.1% 2.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCCSISANGTWLO
Forward P/E 6.7xFY2026 – 44.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $5.55FY2026 $-0.17FY2027 $5.71FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -1.2%FY2026 – +16.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +17.5% – +23.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $383.79MFY2026 $192.47MFY2027 $6.37BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +9.7%FY2026 -3.8%FY2027 +25.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +2.0% +3.5% +1.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCCSISANGTWLO
Held by institutions 98.8% – 90.8%
Institutions holding 166 – 963
Change in shares held, QoQ -3.5% – +1.9%
Institutions buying 67 – 543
Institutions selling 68 – 310
Buyers to sellers 0.99 – 1.75

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CCSISANGTWLO
CCSI 1.00 0.07 0.28
SANG 0.07 1.00 0.07
TWLO 0.28 0.07 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CCSI, SANG and TWLO?

Twilio (TWLO) is the largest by market capitalisation: Consensus Cloud Solutions (CCSI) $686.22M, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) $155.59M, Twilio (TWLO) $36.76B.

Which stock is cheaper, CCSI, SANG and TWLO?

Consensus Cloud Solutions (CCSI) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Consensus Cloud Solutions (CCSI) 7.2x, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) -2.0x, Twilio (TWLO) 32.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Consensus Cloud Solutions (CCSI) is cheapest (Consensus Cloud Solutions (CCSI) 6.7x, Twilio (TWLO) 44.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Twilio (TWLO) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Consensus Cloud Solutions (CCSI) +1.5%, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) -14.2%, Twilio (TWLO) +17.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Consensus Cloud Solutions (CCSI) has the highest net margin (Consensus Cloud Solutions (CCSI) 26.7%, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) -39.0%, Twilio (TWLO) 20.6%). On return on invested capital, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) leads (Consensus Cloud Solutions (CCSI) 19.0%, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) 54.0%, Twilio (TWLO) 3.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Twilio (TWLO) returned the most: Consensus Cloud Solutions (CCSI) +37.2%, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) -7.9%, Twilio (TWLO) +123.7%. Over five years, Twilio (TWLO) compounded fastest (Consensus Cloud Solutions (CCSI) -10.1%/yr, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) -26.7%/yr, Twilio (TWLO) -2.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) has been the steadiest (Consensus Cloud Solutions (CCSI) 53.4%, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) 51.2%, Twilio (TWLO) 62.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CCSI, SANG and TWLO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Twilio (TWLO) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.