CCJ vs EMAT vs UUUU Stock Comparison

Cameco, Evolution Metals & Technologies and Energy Fuels Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CCJ Cameco Corp
$83.87 -3.6% 1M -21.6% 1Y
Market cap
$36.25B
P/E
48.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.73B
Div. yield
–
Uranium Energy
7 wins
UUUU Energy Fuels Inc
$8.40 -23.9% 1M -58.1% 1Y
Market cap
$2.05B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$105.76M
Div. yield
–
Uranium Energy
1 win

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Cameco leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Cameco 7, Energy Fuels 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCCJEMATUUUULeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $36.25B $1.07B $2.05B CCJ
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 48.1x -19.9x -25.1x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 76.9x — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +16.0% — +62.5% UUUU
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 27.6% — -77.3% CCJ
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — -6.7% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.1x — 2.9x CCJ
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -21.6% -86.6% -58.1% CCJ
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +28.1%/yr — +1.4%/yr CCJ
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 50.3% 190.3% 84.4% CCJ
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 81/100 20/100 43/100 CCJ

Percentile Scorecard

CCJEMATUUUU

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCCJEMATUUUU
Valuation 55 #11 of 23 17 #134 of 162 14 #20 of 23
Growth 100 #1 of 21 31 #102 of 147 75 #6 of 21
Profitability 100 #1 of 18 – 47 #10 of 18
Financial Health 71 #7 of 22 12 #144 of 164 57 #10 of 22
Shareholder Returns – – 22 #8 of 10
Overall 81 20 43
  • CCJ ranked among 25 companies in Coal and Uranium
  • EMAT ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • UUUU ranked among 25 companies in Coal and Uranium

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCCJEMATUUUUSPY
1 month -3.6%-47.5%-23.9% +0.9%
3 months -0.8%-61.8%-21.8% +5.9%
6 months -26.6%-81.1%-57.1% +8.5%
Year to date -8.3%-84.7%-42.2% +13.3%
1 year -21.6%-86.6%-58.1% +12.4%
3 years +121.1%-84.4%+11.7% +88.1%
3 years, per year +30.3%-46.2%+3.8% +23.5%
5 years +245.1%—+7.1% +68.2%
5 years, per year +28.1%—+1.4% +11.0%
10 years +957.6%—+483.3% +263.4%
10 years, per year +26.6%—+19.3% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureCCJEMATUUUUSPY
Volatility, 1Y 50.3%190.3%84.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 50.1%158.9%83.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.360.493.13 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.43-0.45-0.69 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -41.4%-93.7%-72.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -37.5%-92.1%-69.7% -0.9%
52-week high $134.09$21.29$27.72 $779.14
52-week low $78.61$1.35$7.52 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCCJEMATUUUU
P/E now vs peer median 48.5xmedian 27.3x -19.5xmedian 13.4x -25.6xmedian 27.3x
P/S now vs peer median 13.4xmedian 7.5x 638.5xmedian 3.2x 19.9xmedian 7.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 45.4xmedian 29.3x —median 7.3x -20.4xmedian 29.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 47.4xmedian 10.6x —median 14.8x -25.4xmedian 10.6x
P/B now vs peer median 7.2xmedian 1.2x -55.4xmedian 2.3x 2.6xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 51.60 -0.56median 0.31 0.67median 51.60

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCCJEMATUUUU
Revenue $2.73B – $105.76M
Gross profit – – $43.20M
Operating income $649.76M -$15.92M -$96.29M
Net income $753.00M -$53.55M -$82.51M
Free cash flow – – -$82.50M
R&D – – $39.87M
EPS (diluted) $1.73 $-0.09 $-0.33
Cash & equivalents $814.08M $5.25M $58.42M
Total debt $4.09B $6.18M $2.03B
Shares (diluted) 435.58M 621.76M 249.32M
Enterprise value $32.84B $1.05B -$893.86M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCCJEMATUUUU
P/E 48.5x -19.5x -25.6x
P/FCF 47.4x – -25.4x
P/Operating cash flow – – -33.6x
P/S 13.4x 638.5x 19.9x
P/B 7.2x -55.4x 2.6x
P/Tangible book 7.3x -41.4x 2.6x
EV/EBITDA 45.4x – -20.4x
EV/EBIT 56.1x -65.7x -19.1x
EV/Revenue 13.3x – 17.4x
EV/FCF – – -22.3x
EV/Operating cash flow – – -29.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -0.56 0.67

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCCJEMATUUUU
Revenue growth (1Y) 16.0% – 62.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – 52.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 1,943%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 41.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) 40.9% -258.6% -3.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – -35.1%
Net income growth (1Y) 156.7% 10.2% 11.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -208.9% -44.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 218.3% 34.3% 22.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 34.5% -38.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – 29.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -24.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – 17.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -10.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCCJEMATUUUU
Gross margin – – 40.9%
EBITDA margin 29.4% – -85.5%
Operating margin 23.8% – -91.0%
Pretax margin 16.4% – -77.8%
Net margin 27.6% – -77.3%
FCF margin – – -78.0%
Operating cash flow margin – – -59.1%
Return on equity – – -10.8%
Return on assets – -91.1% -5.5%
Return on invested capital – – -6.7%
Return on capital employed – – -6.6%
Asset turnover – – 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – 0.8x
Stock comp / revenue – – 13.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCCJEMATUUUU
Debt / assets 11.0% 6.5% 44.2%
Debt / equity 0.2x -0.3x 0.9x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.1x – 2.9x
Debt / FCF – – -8.2x
Liabilities / assets 33.0% 119.8% 48.0%
Equity / assets 67.0% -19.8% 52.0%
Interest coverage 21.4x – –
Current ratio 2.5x 0.2x 27.9x
Quick ratio 1.5x 0.2x 25.7x
Cash ratio 1.1x 0.1x 25.3x
Altman Z-score 10.15 – 1.86

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCCJEMATUUUU
Dividend yield 0.3% – –
Net buyback yield – – -13.2%
Shareholder yield 0.3% – -13.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCCJEMATUUUU
Forward P/E 76.9xFY2026 – –
EPS, next fiscal year $1.09FY2026 $-0.43FY2026 $-0.27FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +3.8%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after +75.2% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.31BFY2026 $15.71MFY2026 $140.99MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -9.1%FY2026 +124.4%FY2026 +113.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +15.9% +2,427.0% +90.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCCJEMATUUUU
Held by institutions 63.3% – 72.3%
Institutions holding 1,027 – 349
Change in shares held, QoQ +4.0% – +8.7%
Institutions buying 506 – 203
Institutions selling 341 – 93
Buyers to sellers 1.48 – 2.18

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CCJEMATUUUU
CCJ 1.00 0.11 0.80
EMAT 0.11 1.00 0.07
UUUU 0.80 0.07 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CCJ, EMAT and UUUU?

Cameco (CCJ) is the largest by market capitalisation: Cameco (CCJ) $36.25B, Evolution Metals & Technologies (EMAT) $1.07B, Energy Fuels (UUUU) $2.05B.

Which company is growing faster?

Energy Fuels (UUUU) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Cameco (CCJ) +16.0%, Energy Fuels (UUUU) +62.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Cameco (CCJ) has the highest net margin (Cameco (CCJ) 27.6%, Energy Fuels (UUUU) -77.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Cameco (CCJ) returned the most: Cameco (CCJ) -21.6%, Evolution Metals & Technologies (EMAT) -86.6%, Energy Fuels (UUUU) -58.1%. Over five years, Cameco (CCJ) compounded fastest (Cameco (CCJ) +28.1%/yr, Energy Fuels (UUUU) +1.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Cameco (CCJ) has been the steadiest (Cameco (CCJ) 50.3%, Evolution Metals & Technologies (EMAT) 190.3%, Energy Fuels (UUUU) 84.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CCJ, EMAT and UUUU?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Cameco (CCJ) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.