CCG vs FORTY vs YB Stock Comparison

Cheche, Formula Systems (1985) and Yuanbao Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CCG Cheche Group Inc.
$7.51 -1.4% 1M +615.2% 1Y
Market cap
$16.99M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Insurtech Technology
1 win
YB Yuanbao Inc.
$11.45 -5.2% 1M -50.6% 1Y
Market cap
$411.96M
P/E
1.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$721.91M
Div. yield
–
Insurtech Technology
5 wins

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Yuanbao leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Yuanbao 5, Formula Systems (1985) 1, Cheche 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCCGFORTYYBLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $16.99M $1.87B $411.96M FORTY
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — 3.0x 1.0x YB
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 2.7x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +24.8% +37.2% YB
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 21.6% 57.3% YB
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 10.1% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 12.44% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +615.2% -14.6% -50.6% CCG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +2.4%/yr — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 364.7% 55.3% 51.2% YB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 86/100 89/100 YB

Percentile Scorecard

CCGFORTYYB

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCCGFORTYYB
Valuation – 96 #3 of 50 87 #14 of 99
Growth – 91 #5 of 45 93 #8 of 94
Profitability – 87 #6 of 40 99 #2 of 90
Financial Health 43 #60 of 105 58 #26 of 60 87 #15 of 105
Shareholder Returns – 100 #1 of 28 81 #12 of 60
Overall – 86 89
  • CCG ranked among 109 companies in Fintech
  • FORTY ranked among 65 companies in Technology Services
  • YB ranked among 109 companies in Fintech

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCCGFORTYYBSPY
1 month -1.4%+6.1%-5.2% +0.7%
3 months -42.7%+15.2%-13.6% +3.7%
6 months +1,004.4%-7.9%-30.6% +7.1%
Year to date +804.8%-27.0%-43.5% +12.8%
1 year +615.2%-14.6%-50.6% +11.9%
3 years +34.6%+112.1%— +85.2%
3 years, per year +10.4%+28.5%— +22.8%
5 years —+12.5%— +67.6%
5 years, per year —+2.4%— +10.9%
10 years —+216.0%— +262.0%
10 years, per year —+12.2%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCCGFORTYYBSPY
Volatility, 1Y 364.7%55.3%51.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 105.7%84.5%51.0% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.010.630.37 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.69-0.26-0.99 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -99.5%-55.5%-64.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -56.4%-36.0%-50.6% -1.2%
52-week high $17.21$190.56$23.19 $779.14
52-week low $0.37$102.01$11.08 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCCGFORTYYB
P/E now vs peer median —median 19.5x 3.0xmedian 17.5x 1.0xmedian 19.5x
P/S now vs peer median —median 2.2x 0.6xmedian 0.7x 0.7xmedian 2.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 17.8x —median 10.4x —median 17.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 16.1x —median 13.3x —median 16.1x
P/B now vs peer median 2.4xmedian 2.0x 1.1xmedian 1.5x 0.9xmedian 2.0x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.98 0.03median 1.28 —median 0.98

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCCGFORTYYB
Revenue – $2.93B $721.91M
Gross profit – $580.29M –
Operating income – $249.80M –
Net income – $697.91M $277.06M
R&D – $21.15M $59.06M
EPS (diluted) – $39.97 $8.68
Cash & equivalents $19.39M $863.79M $168.92M
Total debt $15.13M $642.43M –
Shares (diluted) 2.36M 15.79M 47.65M
Enterprise value -$85.89M -$1.03B -$1.96B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCCGFORTYYB
P/E – 3.0x 1.0x
P/FCF – – –
P/Operating cash flow – – –
P/S – 0.6x 0.7x
P/B 2.4x 1.1x 0.9x
P/Tangible book 2.4x 1.1x 1.0x
EV/EBITDA – – –
EV/EBIT – 4.7x -0.9x
EV/Revenue – 0.4x -0.3x
EV/FCF – – –
EV/Operating cash flow – – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.03 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCCGFORTYYB
Revenue growth (1Y) – 24.8% 37.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 3.9% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 22.3% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -3.2% –
Operating income growth (1Y) – 26.5% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 1.6% –
Net income growth (1Y) – 255.1% 63.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 61.1% –
EPS growth (1Y) – 700.9% 438.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 112.1% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCCGFORTYYB
Gross margin – 19.8% –
EBITDA margin – – –
Operating margin – 8.5% –
Pretax margin – 7.1% 34.1%
Net margin – 21.6% 57.3%
FCF margin – – –
Operating cash flow margin – – –
Return on equity – 40.1% 50.4%
Return on assets – 19.5% 33.2%
Return on invested capital – 10.1% –
Return on capital employed – 11.2% 45.5%
Asset turnover – 0.8x 0.9x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – –
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCCGFORTYYB
Debt / assets 10.1% 4.8% –
Debt / equity 0.3x 0.1x –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 69.9% 52.8% 36.8%
Equity / assets 30.1% 47.2% 63.2%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 1.3x 1.5x 2.9x
Quick ratio 1.2x 1.4x 2.8x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.6x 2.5x
Altman Z-score – – 3.56

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCCGFORTYYB
Dividend yield – 12.4% 11.0%
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 0.0% 12.4% 11.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCCGFORTYYB
Forward P/E – – 2.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-3.67FY2026 – $4.25FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – +553.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – – +21.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $259.30MFY2026 – $881.23MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -40.6%FY2026 – +41.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -5.3% – +22.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCCGFORTYYB
Held by institutions – – 10.3%
Institutions holding – – 23
Change in shares held, QoQ – – +20.8%
Institutions buying – – 14
Institutions selling – – 5
Buyers to sellers – – 2.80

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CCGFORTYYB
CCG 1.00 0.02 0.01
FORTY 0.02 1.00 0.04
YB 0.01 0.04 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CCG, FORTY and YB?

Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY) is the largest by market capitalisation: Cheche (CCG) $16.99M, Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY) $1.87B, Yuanbao (YB) $411.96M.

Which stock is cheaper, CCG, FORTY and YB?

Yuanbao (YB) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY) 3.0x, Yuanbao (YB) 1.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Yuanbao (YB) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY) +24.8%, Yuanbao (YB) +37.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Yuanbao (YB) has the highest net margin (Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY) 21.6%, Yuanbao (YB) 57.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Cheche (CCG) returned the most: Cheche (CCG) +615.2%, Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY) -14.6%, Yuanbao (YB) -50.6%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Cheche (CCG) 0.00%, Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY) 12.44%, Yuanbao (YB) 0.00%. Cheche (CCG) and Yuanbao (YB) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Yuanbao (YB) has been the steadiest (Cheche (CCG) 364.7%, Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY) 55.3%, Yuanbao (YB) 51.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CCG, FORTY and YB?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Yuanbao (YB) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.