CC vs SQM vs WLKP Stock Comparison

Chemours, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile and Westlake Chemical Partners Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CC Chemours Co
$13.35 -7.7% 1M -4.6% 1Y
Market cap
$2.01B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$5.80B
Div. yield
0.03%
Commodity Chemicals Basic Materials

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile 8, Westlake Chemical Partners 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCCSQMWLKPLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.01B $16.81B $746.16M SQM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -6.6x 12.1x 13.0x SQM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 13.2x 8.5x 14.3x SQM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -0.9% +59.0% +12.1% SQM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -5.2% 20.6% 4.7% SQM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -2.7% 22.8% 30.1% WLKP
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 14.6x 0.2x 0.7x SQM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.03% 0.00% 0.09% WLKP
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -4.6% +36.0% +7.0% SQM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -14.0%/yr +2.3%/yr -4.0%/yr SQM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 62.0% 47.3% 18.5% WLKP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 39/100 69/100 86/100 WLKP

Percentile Scorecard

CCSQMWLKP

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCCSQMWLKP
Valuation 74 #25 of 94 81 #32 of 162 99 #2 of 94
Growth 32 #62 of 91 62 #56 of 147 57 #40 of 91
Profitability 40 #52 of 86 81 #24 of 122 100 #1 of 86
Financial Health 17 #79 of 95 32 #112 of 164 85 #15 of 95
Shareholder Returns 33 #47 of 70 90 #12 of 107 87 #10 of 70
Overall 39 69 86
  • CC ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals
  • SQM ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • WLKP ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCCSQMWLKPSPY
1 month -7.7%-9.7%-2.5% -0.2%
3 months -21.8%-9.8%-4.4% +3.9%
6 months -48.1%-32.5%-7.9% +8.2%
Year to date +13.2%-12.3%+10.6% +12.9%
1 year -4.6%+36.0%+7.0% +12.3%
3 years -43.4%+18.1%-1.3% +87.4%
3 years, per year -17.3%+5.7%-0.4% +23.3%
5 years -53.0%+11.8%-18.2% +67.9%
5 years, per year -14.0%+2.3%-4.0% +10.9%
10 years -21.0%+104.0%-0.4% +261.1%
10 years, per year -2.3%+7.4%0.0% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCCSQMWLKPSPY
Volatility, 1Y 62.0%47.3%18.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 67.6%43.9%17.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.440.980.21 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.070.760.38 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -79.0%-73.5%-38.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -52.2%-36.7%-11.4% -1.2%
52-week high $27.94$95.31$23.72 $779.14
52-week low $10.48$44.36$17.87 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCCSQMWLKP
P/E now vs peer median -6.6xmedian 22.0x 12.4xmedian 13.3x 12.9xmedian 22.0x
P/S now vs peer median 0.3xmedian 1.4x 2.6xmedian 3.2x 0.6xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 23.8xmedian 12.4x 5.1xmedian 7.3x 2.2xmedian 12.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 9.2xmedian 15.1x —median 14.7x 1.8xmedian 15.1x
P/B now vs peer median -41.0xmedian 1.6x 2.0xmedian 2.2x 1.0xmedian 1.6x
PEG now vs peer median 0.13median 1.66 -0.79median 0.31 —median 1.66

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCCSQMWLKP
Revenue $5.80B $6.73B $1.23B
Gross profit $887.00M $2.83B $384.80M
Operating income -$111.00M $3.11B $355.62M
Net income -$304.00M $1.39B $334.49M
Free cash flow $218.00M – $409.14M
R&D $106.00M – –
EPS (diluted) $-2.01 $4.86 –
Cash & equivalents $671.00M $3.38B $49.32M
Total debt $3.87B $19.72B $1.60B
Shares (diluted) 151.23M 285.64M –
Enterprise value -$511.76M $3.47B $570.34M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCCSQMWLKP
P/E -6.6x 12.4x 12.9x
P/FCF 9.2x – 1.8x
P/Operating cash flow 5.1x – 1.6x
P/S 0.3x 2.6x 0.6x
P/B -41.0x 2.0x 1.0x
P/Tangible book -39.4x 2.0x 1.0x
EV/EBITDA 23.8x 5.1x 2.2x
EV/EBIT -46.9x 5.8x 3.1x
EV/Revenue 0.9x 2.7x 0.9x
EV/FCF 23.9x – 2.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 13.1x – 2.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.13 -0.79 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCCSQMWLKP
Revenue growth (1Y) -0.9% 59.0% 12.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -2.9% -4.8% -3.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -16.7% 150.2% 4.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -14.4% -9.3% 0.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) -88.1% 134.4% 4.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -57.6% -17.5% 0.0%
Net income growth (1Y) 28.8% 190.5% 4.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -51.2% -7.2% -0.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 29.4% 190.5% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) -50.5% -15.7% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 53.9% – 48.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -0.7% – -1.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 503.7% – 67.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 23.1% – -2.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCCSQMWLKP
Gross margin 15.3% 42.1% 31.2%
EBITDA margin 3.8% 52.7% 40.0%
Operating margin -1.9% 46.2% 28.8%
Pretax margin -0.9% 36.6% 27.1%
Net margin -5.2% 20.6% 4.7%
FCF margin 3.8% – 33.1%
Operating cash flow margin 6.8% – 37.7%
Return on equity -364.1% 16.4% 42.8%
Return on assets -4.2% 8.6% 27.3%
Return on invested capital -2.7% 22.8% 30.1%
Return on capital employed -2.1% 23.4% 30.1%
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.4x 1.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -1.3x – 1.4x
Stock comp / revenue 0.4% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCCSQMWLKP
Debt / assets 54.2% 31.3% 32.8%
Debt / equity -79.0x 0.6x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 14.6x 0.2x 0.7x
Debt / FCF 17.8x – 1.0x
Liabilities / assets 100.7% 47.9% 36.8%
Equity / assets -0.7% 52.1% 63.2%
Interest coverage -0.4x 15.3x 16.4x
Current ratio 1.7x 2.6x 3.4x
Quick ratio 0.9x 1.8x 1.9x
Cash ratio 0.4x 1.5x 1.1x
Altman Z-score 1.31 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCCSQMWLKP
Dividend yield 2.7% 4.0% 9.0%
Net buyback yield -0.2% – –
Shareholder yield 2.5% 4.0% 9.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) -17.8% – 19.9%
Payout ratio (FCF) 24.8% – 16.2%
Dividend growth (1Y) -56.5% – 0.0%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -29.0% – 0.0%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCCSQMWLKP
Forward P/E 13.2xFY2026 8.5xFY2026 14.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.01FY2026 $7.12FY2026 $1.47FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +6.3%FY2026 +245.6%FY2026 +6.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +94.1% -2.5% +20.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $5.74BFY2026 $8.37BFY2026 $1.31BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -1.2%FY2026 +82.7%FY2026 +11.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +4.0% +2.9% +16.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCCSQMWLKP
Held by institutions 89.4% 13.4% 29.1%
Institutions holding 471 316 56
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.8% -3.0% -0.2%
Institutions buying 213 166 26
Institutions selling 127 100 13
Buyers to sellers 1.68 1.66 2.00

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CCSQMWLKP
CC 1.00 0.27 0.18
SQM 0.27 1.00 0.07
WLKP 0.18 0.07 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CC, SQM and WLKP?

Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Chemours (CC) $2.01B, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) $16.81B, Westlake Chemical Partners (WLKP) $746.16M.

Which stock is cheaper, CC, SQM and WLKP?

Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Chemours (CC) -6.6x, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) 12.1x, Westlake Chemical Partners (WLKP) 13.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) is cheapest (Chemours (CC) 13.2x, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) 8.5x, Westlake Chemical Partners (WLKP) 14.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Chemours (CC) -0.9%, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) +59.0%, Westlake Chemical Partners (WLKP) +12.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) has the highest net margin (Chemours (CC) -5.2%, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) 20.6%, Westlake Chemical Partners (WLKP) 4.7%). On return on invested capital, Westlake Chemical Partners (WLKP) leads (Chemours (CC) -2.7%, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) 22.8%, Westlake Chemical Partners (WLKP) 30.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) returned the most: Chemours (CC) -4.6%, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) +36.0%, Westlake Chemical Partners (WLKP) +7.0%. Over five years, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) compounded fastest (Chemours (CC) -14.0%/yr, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) +2.3%/yr, Westlake Chemical Partners (WLKP) -4.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Westlake Chemical Partners (WLKP) has the highest dividend yield: Chemours (CC) 0.03%, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) 0.00%, Westlake Chemical Partners (WLKP) 0.09%. Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Westlake Chemical Partners (WLKP) has been the steadiest (Chemours (CC) 62.0%, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) 47.3%, Westlake Chemical Partners (WLKP) 18.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CC, SQM and WLKP?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.