CB vs MUFG vs TD Stock Comparison

Chubb, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial and Toronto Dominion Bank Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CB Chubb Ltd
$356.26 +6.9% 1M +26.5% 1Y
Market cap
$138.09B
P/E
12.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$61.80B
Div. yield
0.01%
Property and Casualty Insurance Financial Services
4 wins
TD Toronto Dominion Bank
$125.74 +4.3% 1M +54.0% 1Y
Market cap
$216.82B
P/E
19.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$46.75B
Div. yield
0.03%
Money Center Banks Financial Services
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Mitsubishi Ufj Financial leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Mitsubishi Ufj Financial 4, Chubb 4, Toronto Dominion Bank 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCBMUFGTDLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $138.09B $243.61B $216.82B MUFG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 12.3x 16.1x 19.3x CB
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 11.5x 12.6x 18.4x CB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +8.0% -12.0% -3.6% CB
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 18.1% 47.7% 24.1% MUFG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -9.6% 3.6% — MUFG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.00% 0.03% TD
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +26.5% +44.2% +54.0% TD
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +12.7%/yr +31.0%/yr +11.6%/yr MUFG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 19.5% 26.3% 18.2% TD
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 55/100 37/100 23/100 CB

Percentile Scorecard

CBMUFGTD

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCBMUFGTD
Valuation 38 #74 of 119 20 #287 of 360 13 #312 of 360
Growth 59 #47 of 114 82 #36 of 191 37 #121 of 191
Profitability 60 #45 of 110 61 #66 of 168 12 #148 of 168
Financial Health 57 #48 of 110 6 #164 of 175 1 #173 of 175
Shareholder Returns 60 #43 of 106 16 #287 of 341 54 #159 of 341
Overall 55 37 23
  • CB ranked among 126 companies in Insurance
  • MUFG ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • TD ranked among 368 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCBMUFGTDSPY
1 month +6.9%-8.5%+4.3% -0.2%
3 months -2.0%-4.2%+4.5% +3.9%
6 months +7.8%+22.5%+19.3% +8.2%
Year to date +14.1%+35.5%+33.5% +12.9%
1 year +26.5%+44.2%+54.0% +12.3%
3 years +70.8%+160.8%+129.0% +87.4%
3 years, per year +19.6%+37.7%+31.8% +23.3%
5 years +81.7%+285.1%+73.0% +67.9%
5 years, per year +12.7%+31.0%+11.6% +10.9%
10 years +180.5%+318.1%+177.1% +261.1%
10 years, per year +10.9%+15.4%+10.7% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCBMUFGTDSPY
Volatility, 1Y 19.5%26.3%18.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 18.0%26.7%19.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.410.920.75 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.361.682.96 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -20.0%-35.6%-39.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -2.1%-11.0%0.0% -1.2%
52-week high $364.00$24.14$125.74 $779.14
52-week low $275.58$14.88$80.43 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCBMUFGTD
P/E now vs peer median 12.3xmedian 10.5x 16.2xmedian 12.1x 19.3xmedian 12.1x
P/S now vs peer median 2.2xmedian 1.4x 8.1xmedian 3.4x 4.5xmedian 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 7.6x —median 5.0x 10.2xmedian 5.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 8.9xmedian 8.5x —median 10.9x 38.3xmedian 10.9x
P/B now vs peer median 1.7xmedian 1.5x 2.4xmedian 1.2x 2.3xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.46median 0.53 0.27median 1.34 4.57median 1.34

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCBMUFGTD
Revenue $61.80B $31.62B $46.75B
Gross profit $35.75B $29.85B –
Operating income -$11.77B $18.02B $3.46B
Net income $11.51B $13.97B $11.69B
Free cash flow $15.38B – $5.55B
EPS (diluted) $28.59 $1.32 $6.52
Cash & equivalents $2.75B – $4.86B
Total debt $18.54B $494.43B –
Shares (diluted) 391.25M 11.40B 1.73B
Enterprise value $84.67B -$97.78B -$459.05B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCBMUFGTD
P/E 12.3x 16.2x 19.3x
P/FCF 8.9x – 38.3x
P/Operating cash flow 8.9x – 38.3x
P/S 2.2x 8.1x 4.5x
P/B 1.7x 2.4x 2.3x
P/Tangible book 1.8x 2.4x 2.4x
EV/EBITDA – – 10.2x
EV/EBIT -12.1x 5.5x 15.0x
EV/Revenue 2.3x 3.1x 1.1x
EV/FCF 9.2x – 9.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 9.2x – 9.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.46 0.27 4.57

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCBMUFGTD
Revenue growth (1Y) 8.0% -12.0% -3.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 10.0% -2.4% 5.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 19.6% 38.8% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 16.1% 7.6% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 25.7% 24.8% 17.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 10.6% 12.7% 47.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 21.5% 62.6% -21.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 25.7% 32.4% 2.7%
EPS growth (1Y) 25.5% 104.8% -20.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 27.1% 59.4% 4.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 9.8% – -64.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 12.3% – 28.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 9.8% – -64.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 12.3% – 28.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCBMUFGTD
Gross margin 57.8% 94.4% –
EBITDA margin – – 10.9%
Operating margin -19.0% 57.0% 7.4%
Pretax margin 23.1% 59.6% -66.0%
Net margin 18.1% 47.7% 24.1%
FCF margin 24.9% – 11.9%
Operating cash flow margin 24.9% – 11.9%
Return on equity 14.3% 11.7% 12.9%
Return on assets 4.1% 0.5% 0.8%
Return on invested capital -9.6% 3.6% –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.0x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.3x – 0.5x
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCBMUFGTD
Debt / assets 6.6% 4.7% –
Debt / equity 0.2x 1.2x –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF 1.2x – –
Liabilities / assets 71.3% 96.0% 94.0%
Equity / assets 28.7% 4.0% 6.0%
Interest coverage -14.7x 0.6x 0.1x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCBMUFGTD
Dividend yield 1.1% 1.4% 3.5%
Net buyback yield 3.0% – 2.4%
Shareholder yield 4.1% 1.4% 5.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) 13.3% – 48.3%
Payout ratio (FCF) 10.0% – 101.8%
Dividend growth (1Y) 4.4% – 4.6%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 3.5% – 6.8%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCBMUFGTD
Forward P/E 11.5xFY2026 12.6xFY2026 18.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $30.86FY2026 $1.71FY2026 $6.83FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +24.5%FY2026 +27.6%FY2026 +14.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +2.1% +0.6% +9.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $61.37BFY2026 $44.38BFY2026 $45.67BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +11.9%FY2026 +18.6%FY2026 +14.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +6.9% +4.0% +3.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCBMUFGTD
Held by institutions 89.7% 3.0% 45.9%
Institutions holding 2,149 574 900
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.8% -0.1% -1.2%
Institutions buying 1,014 324 385
Institutions selling 803 160 304
Buyers to sellers 1.26 2.03 1.27

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CBMUFGTD
CB 1.00 -0.05 -0.03
MUFG -0.05 1.00 0.49
TD -0.03 0.49 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CB, MUFG and TD?

Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) is the largest by market capitalisation: Chubb (CB) $138.09B, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) $243.61B, Toronto Dominion Bank (TD) $216.82B.

Which stock is cheaper, CB, MUFG and TD?

Chubb (CB) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Chubb (CB) 12.3x, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 16.1x, Toronto Dominion Bank (TD) 19.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Chubb (CB) is cheapest (Chubb (CB) 11.5x, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 12.6x, Toronto Dominion Bank (TD) 18.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Chubb (CB) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Chubb (CB) +8.0%, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) -12.0%, Toronto Dominion Bank (TD) -3.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) has the highest net margin (Chubb (CB) 18.1%, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 47.7%, Toronto Dominion Bank (TD) 24.1%). On return on invested capital, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) leads (Chubb (CB) -9.6%, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 3.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Toronto Dominion Bank (TD) returned the most: Chubb (CB) +26.5%, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) +44.2%, Toronto Dominion Bank (TD) +54.0%. Over five years, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) compounded fastest (Chubb (CB) +12.7%/yr, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) +31.0%/yr, Toronto Dominion Bank (TD) +11.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Toronto Dominion Bank (TD) has the highest dividend yield: Chubb (CB) 0.01%, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 0.00%, Toronto Dominion Bank (TD) 0.03%. Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Toronto Dominion Bank (TD) has been the steadiest (Chubb (CB) 19.5%, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 26.3%, Toronto Dominion Bank (TD) 18.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CB, MUFG and TD?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.