CART vs RZLV vs BKNG Stock Comparison

Maplebear, Rezolve Ai and Booking Holdings Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CART Maplebear Inc.
$59.22 +29.7% 1M +62.4% 1Y
Market cap
$13.80B
P/E
29.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.99B
Div. yield
–
Digital Marketplaces Technology
3 wins
RZLV Rezolve Ai Plc
$1.37 -38.6% 1M -66.0% 1Y
Market cap
$367.13M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
E-commerce Software Technology
BKNG Booking Holdings Inc.
$170.97 +8.0% 1M -14.4% 1Y
Market cap
$127.15B
P/E
17.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$28.13B
Div. yield
0.73%
Digital Marketplaces Technology
5 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Booking Holdings leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Booking Holdings 5, Maplebear 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCARTRZLVBKNGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $13.80B $367.13M $127.15B BKNG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 29.0x -2.2x 17.9x BKNG
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 24.1x — 15.7x BKNG
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +12.6% — +8.0% CART
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 12.0% — 25.5% BKNG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 75.1% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 0.4x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — 0.73% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +62.4% -66.0% -14.4% CART
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — — +10.3%/yr –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 44.0% 99.5% 39.4% BKNG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 70/100 — 59/100 CART

Percentile Scorecard

CARTRZLVBKNG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCARTRZLVBKNG
Valuation 47 #89 of 166 6 #156 of 166 63 #62 of 166
Growth 49 #79 of 154 – 34 #102 of 154
Profitability 91 #15 of 154 – 99 #3 of 154
Financial Health 74 #47 of 179 27 #131 of 179 43 #103 of 179
Shareholder Returns 89 #12 of 97 – 55 #44 of 97
Overall 70 – 59
  • CART ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • RZLV ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • BKNG ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCARTRZLVBKNGSPY
1 month +29.7%-38.6%+8.0% -1.0%
3 months +30.6%-49.4%-17.4% -0.4%
6 months +47.5%-42.2%+1.6% +4.5%
Year to date +31.7%-46.7%-20.2% +12.4%
1 year +62.4%-66.0%-14.4% +13.6%
3 years +120.1%-87.2%+49.5% +76.4%
3 years, per year +30.1%-49.6%+14.4% +20.8%
5 years ——+63.2% +63.7%
5 years, per year ——+10.3% +10.4%
10 years ——+200.1% +267.7%
10 years, per year ——+11.6% +13.9%

Risk

MeasureCARTRZLVBKNGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 44.0%99.5%39.4% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 43.3%92.4%38.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.412.770.91 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.42-0.66-0.37 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -38.0%-91.8%-39.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -2.7%-70.4%-22.2% -1.6%
52-week high $60.88$4.63$219.68 $779.14
52-week low $32.93$1.37$147.94 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCARTRZLVBKNG
P/E now vs peer median 29.0xmedian 18.2x -2.2xmedian 18.2x 17.9xmedian 18.2x
P/S now vs peer median 3.5xmedian 1.5x 7.8xmedian 1.5x 4.5xmedian 1.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 18.5xmedian 15.3x —median 15.3x 13.4xmedian 15.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 11.7xmedian 12.2x -5.8xmedian 12.2x 13.8xmedian 12.2x
P/B now vs peer median 5.9xmedian 1.8x 1.5xmedian 1.8x -12.2xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median 27.31median 0.38 —median 0.38 -0.30median 0.38

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCARTRZLVBKNG
Revenue $3.99B – $28.13B
Gross profit $2.90B – –
Operating income $588.00M – $9.22B
Net income $480.00M – $7.18B
Free cash flow $1.18B – $9.24B
R&D $706.00M – –
EPS (diluted) $1.93 – $9.53
Cash & equivalents $757.00M $111.11M $15.81B
Total debt – $154.04M $20.06B
Shares (diluted) 248.94M 162.86M 753.00M
Enterprise value $9.84B $236.23M $60.90B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCARTRZLVBKNG
P/E 29.0x -2.2x 17.9x
P/FCF 11.7x -5.8x 13.8x
P/Operating cash flow 11.2x – 13.3x
P/S 3.5x 7.8x 4.5x
P/B 5.9x 1.5x -12.2x
P/Tangible book 6.1x 48.2x -11.4x
EV/EBITDA 18.5x – 13.4x
EV/EBIT 22.0x – 14.3x
EV/Revenue 3.2x – 4.7x
EV/FCF 11.0x – 14.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 10.5x – 13.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 27.31 – -0.30

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCARTRZLVBKNG
Revenue growth (1Y) 12.6% – 8.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 11.3% – 10.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 9.2% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 10.1% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 11.6% – 8.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 13.3% – 11.9%
Net income growth (1Y) -1.6% – 42.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -13.6% – 10.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 10.0% – -93.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 1.1% – -59.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 46.8% – 10.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 5.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 51.0% – 11.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 5.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCARTRZLVBKNG
Gross margin 72.6% – –
EBITDA margin 17.6% – 34.9%
Operating margin 14.7% – 32.8%
Pretax margin 15.7% – 32.9%
Net margin 12.0% – 25.5%
FCF margin 29.5% – 32.8%
Operating cash flow margin 30.9% – 34.0%
Return on equity 20.4% – –
Return on assets 13.6% – 24.8%
Return on invested capital – – 75.1%
Return on capital employed 22.7% – 96.0%
Asset turnover 1.1x – 1.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.6x – 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue 10.0% – 2.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCARTRZLVBKNG
Debt / assets – 25.2% 71.0%
Debt / equity – 0.6x -1.9x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 0.4x
Debt / FCF – – 2.2x
Liabilities / assets 33.8% 59.7% 136.8%
Equity / assets 66.2% 40.3% -36.8%
Interest coverage – – 8.3x
Current ratio 2.3x 0.7x 1.1x
Quick ratio 2.0x 0.6x 1.0x
Cash ratio 0.9x 0.4x 0.8x
Altman Z-score 7.09 – 6.39

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCARTRZLVBKNG
Dividend yield – – 0.7%
Net buyback yield 13.4% – 9.5%
Shareholder yield 13.4% – 10.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCARTRZLVBKNG
Forward P/E 24.1xFY2026 – 15.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.46FY2026 $-0.50FY2026 $10.90FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +53.7%FY2026 – +19.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +14.2% – +16.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.00BFY2026 $368.55MFY2026 $27.56BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +7.1%FY2026 +687.5%FY2026 +2.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +25.3% +40.2% +11.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCARTRZLVBKNG
Held by institutions 82.5% 12.0% 92.9%
Institutions holding 502 114 1,920
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.5% -32.9% -9.6%
Institutions buying 246 62 894
Institutions selling 181 43 830
Buyers to sellers 1.36 1.44 1.08

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CARTRZLVBKNG
CART 1.00 0.04 0.21
RZLV 0.04 1.00 0.05
BKNG 0.21 0.05 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CART, RZLV and BKNG?

Booking Holdings (BKNG) is the largest by market capitalisation: Maplebear (CART) $13.80B, Rezolve Ai (RZLV) $367.13M, Booking Holdings (BKNG) $127.15B.

Which stock is cheaper, CART, RZLV and BKNG?

Booking Holdings (BKNG) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Maplebear (CART) 29.0x, Rezolve Ai (RZLV) -2.2x, Booking Holdings (BKNG) 17.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Booking Holdings (BKNG) is cheapest (Maplebear (CART) 24.1x, Booking Holdings (BKNG) 15.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Maplebear (CART) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Maplebear (CART) +12.6%, Booking Holdings (BKNG) +8.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Booking Holdings (BKNG) has the highest net margin (Maplebear (CART) 12.0%, Booking Holdings (BKNG) 25.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Maplebear (CART) returned the most: Maplebear (CART) +62.4%, Rezolve Ai (RZLV) -66.0%, Booking Holdings (BKNG) -14.4%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Booking Holdings (BKNG) 0.73%. Maplebear (CART) and Rezolve Ai (RZLV) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Booking Holdings (BKNG) has been the steadiest (Maplebear (CART) 44.0%, Rezolve Ai (RZLV) 99.5%, Booking Holdings (BKNG) 39.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CART, RZLV and BKNG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Booking Holdings (BKNG) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.