CACC vs HTT vs BFH Stock Comparison

Credit Acceptance, High Templar Tech and Bread Financial Holdings Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CACC Credit Acceptance Corp
$537.38 -3.3% 1M +6.1% 1Y
Market cap
$5.66B
P/E
11.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.33B
Div. yield
–
Consumer Lending Financial Services
3 wins
HTT High Templar Tech Ltd
$1.90 -20.8% 1M -57.2% 1Y
Market cap
$839.32M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Consumer Lending Financial Services

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Bread Financial Holdings leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Bread Financial Holdings 8, Credit Acceptance 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCACCHTTBFHLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $5.66B $839.32M $4.10B CACC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 11.3x — 7.3x BFH
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 11.7x — 8.3x BFH
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +2.6% — +3.9% BFH
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 21.5% — 14.3% CACC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 10.7% — 20.2% BFH
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 5.6x — -0.8x BFH
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.01% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +6.1% -57.2% +55.4% BFH
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -1.8%/yr +1.8%/yr +7.6%/yr BFH
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 37.6% 56.9% 39.9% CACC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 64/100 — 81/100 BFH

Percentile Scorecard

CACCHTTBFH

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCACCHTTBFH
Valuation 59 #71 of 170 – 96 #7 of 170
Growth 56 #71 of 160 – 67 #53 of 160
Profitability 93 #12 of 149 – 86 #22 of 149
Financial Health 32 #108 of 158 93 #12 of 158 73 #43 of 158
Shareholder Returns 80 #28 of 135 – 84 #23 of 135
Overall 64 – 81
  • CACC ranked among 175 companies in Lending and Credit
  • HTT ranked among 175 companies in Lending and Credit
  • BFH ranked among 175 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCACCHTTBFHSPY
1 month -3.3%-20.8%-1.1% -0.8%
3 months -2.8%-21.5%-4.0% +3.5%
6 months +4.3%-21.8%+15.7% +7.0%
Year to date +21.2%-46.5%+37.5% +12.2%
1 year +6.1%-57.2%+55.4% +13.0%
3 years +32.8%+5.6%+280.3% +86.3%
3 years, per year +9.9%+1.8%+56.1% +23.1%
5 years -8.7%+9.2%+44.1% +68.6%
5 years, per year -1.8%+1.8%+7.6% +11.0%
10 years +192.0%—-37.1% +258.0%
10 years, per year +11.3%—-4.5% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureCACCHTTBFHSPY
Volatility, 1Y 37.6%56.9%39.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 39.8%59.8%45.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.271.151.18 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.16-1.011.39 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -45.7%-64.4%-70.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -18.2%-61.6%-10.2% -1.8%
52-week high $657.20$4.95$113.40 $779.14
52-week low $411.04$1.90$59.98 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCACCHTTBFH
P/E now vs peer median 11.2xmedian 11.0x —median 11.0x 7.2xmedian 11.0x
P/S now vs peer median 2.4xmedian 2.6x —median 2.6x 1.0xmedian 2.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 10.6xmedian 13.1x —median 13.1x 1.7xmedian 13.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 4.6xmedian 6.9x —median 6.9x 1.8xmedian 6.9x
P/B now vs peer median 3.5xmedian 0.7x 0.5xmedian 0.7x 1.2xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median 0.51median 0.32 —median 0.32 0.62median 0.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCACCHTTBFH
Revenue $2.33B – $3.96B
Gross profit $2.26B – –
Operating income $1.10B – –
Net income $501.90M – $569.00M
Free cash flow $1.22B – $2.19B
EPS (diluted) $46.76 – $13.88
Cash & equivalents $1.40M $561.74M $3.68B
Total debt $6.29B $879.65M $2.45B
Shares (diluted) 10.73M 500.73M 40.70M
Enterprise value $5.60B -$2.19B -$10.59B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCACCHTTBFH
P/E 11.2x – 7.2x
P/FCF 4.6x – 1.8x
P/Operating cash flow 4.6x – 1.8x
P/S 2.4x – 1.0x
P/B 3.5x 0.5x 1.2x
P/Tangible book 3.5x 0.5x 1.2x
EV/EBITDA 10.6x – 1.7x
EV/EBIT 10.8x – 1.8x
EV/Revenue 5.1x – 0.7x
EV/FCF 9.7x – 1.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 9.7x – 1.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.51 – 0.62

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCACCHTTBFH
Revenue growth (1Y) 2.6% – 3.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 8.0% – -2.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 2.8% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 8.1% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 8.1% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 19.1% – –
Net income growth (1Y) 18.3% – 99.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 14.3% – 4.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 29.7% – 129.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 22.2% – 11.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 10.4% – 18.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 0.9% – 5.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 10.2% – 18.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 0.9% – 6.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCACCHTTBFH
Gross margin 97.0% – –
EBITDA margin 48.1% – 39.7%
Operating margin 47.0% – –
Pretax margin 27.9% – 17.3%
Net margin 21.5% – 14.3%
FCF margin 52.4% – 55.4%
Operating cash flow margin 52.6% – 55.4%
Return on equity 32.3% – 17.0%
Return on assets 5.8% – 2.5%
Return on invested capital 10.7% – 20.2%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.3x – 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.4x – 3.9x
Stock comp / revenue 1.9% – 1.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCACCHTTBFH
Debt / assets 72.9% 16.0% 10.9%
Debt / equity 4.0x 0.2x 0.7x
Net debt / EBITDA 5.6x – -0.8x
Debt / FCF 5.1x – 1.1x
Liabilities / assets 81.6% 21.2% 85.0%
Equity / assets 18.4% 78.8% 15.0%
Interest coverage 2.5x – 1.9x
Current ratio – 4.8x –
Quick ratio – 2.4x –
Cash ratio – 2.4x –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCACCHTTBFH
Dividend yield – – 0.9%
Net buyback yield 9.2% – 14.2%
Shareholder yield 9.2% – 15.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 7.9%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 2.1%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 4.7%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 1.5%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCACCHTTBFH
Forward P/E 11.7xFY2026 – 8.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $45.85FY2026 $-0.04FY2024 $12.23FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +16.0%FY2026 -233.3%FY2024 +0.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +20.9% – +7.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.32BFY2026 $47.00MFY2024 $3.93BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -0.1%FY2026 +164.2%FY2024 +2.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +1.3% – +11.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCACCHTTBFH
Held by institutions 72.5% 2.2% 98.3%
Institutions holding 298 42 421
Change in shares held, QoQ +11.5% -26.1% -14.5%
Institutions buying 174 14 205
Institutions selling 88 21 155
Buyers to sellers 1.98 0.67 1.32

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CACCHTTBFH
CACC 1.00 0.13 0.38
HTT 0.13 1.00 0.11
BFH 0.38 0.11 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CACC, HTT and BFH?

Credit Acceptance (CACC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Credit Acceptance (CACC) $5.66B, High Templar Tech (HTT) $839.32M, Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) $4.10B.

Which stock is cheaper, CACC, HTT and BFH?

Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Credit Acceptance (CACC) 11.3x, Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) 7.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) is cheapest (Credit Acceptance (CACC) 11.7x, Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) 8.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Credit Acceptance (CACC) +2.6%, Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) +3.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Credit Acceptance (CACC) has the highest net margin (Credit Acceptance (CACC) 21.5%, Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) 14.3%). On return on invested capital, Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) leads (Credit Acceptance (CACC) 10.7%, Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) 20.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) returned the most: Credit Acceptance (CACC) +6.1%, High Templar Tech (HTT) -57.2%, Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) +55.4%. Over five years, Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) compounded fastest (Credit Acceptance (CACC) -1.8%/yr, High Templar Tech (HTT) +1.8%/yr, Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) +7.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Credit Acceptance (CACC) 0.00%, High Templar Tech (HTT) 0.00%, Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) 0.01%. Credit Acceptance (CACC) and High Templar Tech (HTT) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Credit Acceptance (CACC) has been the steadiest (Credit Acceptance (CACC) 37.6%, High Templar Tech (HTT) 56.9%, Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) 39.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CACC, HTT and BFH?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Bread Financial Holdings (BFH) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.