BZUN vs DASH vs BLIV Stock Comparison

Baozun, DoorDash and BeLive Holdings Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BZUN Baozun Inc.
$3.63 +23.5% 1M +0.8% 1Y
Market cap
$193.72M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.51B
Div. yield
–
E-commerce Software Technology
3 wins
DASH DoorDash, Inc.
$168.44 -12.9% 1M -34.8% 1Y
Market cap
$74.12B
P/E
88.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$15.89B
Div. yield
–
Ride-Hailing and Delivery Technology
5 wins
BLIV BeLive Holdings
$2.30 -1.7% 1M -37.0% 1Y
Market cap
$24.99M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
E-commerce Software Technology

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

DoorDash leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (DoorDash 5, Baozun 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBZUNDASHBLIVLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $193.72M $74.12B $24.99M DASH
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -10.2x 88.1x -4.6x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 8.3x 60.6x — BZUN
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +12.1% +33.6% — DASH
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -1.3% 5.3% — DASH
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +0.8% -34.8% -37.0% BZUN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -27.1%/yr -3.3%/yr — DASH
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 51.4% 50.1% 82.4% DASH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 64/100 54/100 — BZUN

Percentile Scorecard

BZUNDASHBLIV

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBZUNDASHBLIV
Valuation – 27 #122 of 167 8 #153 of 167
Growth 74 #41 of 153 82 #28 of 153 –
Profitability 57 #66 of 153 62 #59 of 153 –
Financial Health 62 #69 of 179 57 #77 of 179 99 #3 of 179
Shareholder Returns – 43 #54 of 94 –
Overall 64 54 –
  • BZUN ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • DASH ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • BLIV ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBZUNDASHBLIVSPY
1 month +23.5%-12.9%-1.7% -0.8%
3 months +28.7%-8.6%-3.4% +3.5%
6 months +29.6%-3.2%-8.0% +7.0%
Year to date +36.5%-25.6%-35.8% +12.2%
1 year +0.8%-34.8%-37.0% +13.0%
3 years +21.8%+138.4%— +86.3%
3 years, per year +6.8%+33.6%— +23.1%
5 years -79.4%-15.3%— +68.6%
5 years, per year -27.1%-3.3%— +11.0%
10 years -75.7%—— +258.0%
10 years, per year -13.2%—— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureBZUNDASHBLIVSPY
Volatility, 1Y 51.4%50.1%82.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 46.8%53.4%94.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.191.390.26 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.02-0.69-0.45 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -89.5%-82.5%-68.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -5.5%-36.7%-41.8% -1.8%
52-week high $3.84$266.06$3.95 $779.14
52-week low $2.10$146.60$2.10 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBZUNDASHBLIV
P/E now vs peer median -11.0xmedian 17.5x 87.0xmedian 17.5x -4.6xmedian 17.5x
P/S now vs peer median 0.1xmedian 1.4x 4.6xmedian 1.4x 43.1xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 14.5x 37.6xmedian 14.5x —median 14.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 12.1x 28.1xmedian 12.1x -8.8xmedian 12.1x
P/B now vs peer median —median 1.7x 7.4xmedian 1.7x 3.7xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median -0.30median 0.41 2.33median 0.41 —median 0.41

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBZUNDASHBLIV
Revenue $1.51B $15.89B –
Gross profit $1.12B $8.17B –
Operating income $30.89M $712.00M –
Net income $608.00K $841.00M –
Free cash flow – $2.60B –
R&D $67.81M $1.71B –
EPS (diluted) $-0.33 $1.91 –
Cash & equivalents $175.91M $4.42B $6.68M
Total debt $182.60M – –
Shares (diluted) 57.83M 439.35M 10.14M
Enterprise value -$1.37B $53.49B $18.31M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBZUNDASHBLIV
P/E -11.0x 87.0x -4.6x
P/FCF – 28.1x -8.8x
P/Operating cash flow – 25.8x –
P/S 0.1x 4.6x 43.1x
P/B – 7.4x 3.7x
P/Tangible book – 9.2x 3.8x
EV/EBITDA – 37.6x –
EV/EBIT -1.2x 95.0x –
EV/Revenue 0.0x 4.3x –
EV/FCF – 26.1x –
EV/Operating cash flow – 23.9x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.30 2.33 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBZUNDASHBLIV
Revenue growth (1Y) 12.1% 33.6% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 7.6% 27.4% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 13.7% 37.3% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 7.8% 32.2% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 261.3% 31.4% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 109.5% 38.8% –
Net income growth (1Y) 104.3% 7.1% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 26.2% 38.6% –
EPS growth (1Y) 24.0% 7.4% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 36.5% 37.3% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 29.3% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 40.9% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 30.8% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 45.2% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBZUNDASHBLIV
Gross margin 74.2% 51.4% –
EBITDA margin – 11.3% –
Operating margin 2.1% 4.5% –
Pretax margin 0.6% 5.5% –
Net margin -1.3% 5.3% –
FCF margin – 16.3% –
Operating cash flow margin – 17.8% –
Return on equity – 8.3% –
Return on assets 0.0% 4.3% –
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed 3.5% 5.3% –
Asset turnover 1.1x 0.8x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 3.4x –
Stock comp / revenue – 7.0% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBZUNDASHBLIV
Debt / assets 12.9% – –
Debt / equity – – –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 42.4% 49.3% 5.8%
Equity / assets – 50.7% 94.2%
Interest coverage 5.6x – –
Current ratio 1.9x 1.4x 17.1x
Quick ratio 1.4x 1.1x 17.1x
Cash ratio 0.8x 0.9x 16.6x
Altman Z-score – 5.26 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBZUNDASHBLIV
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – 1.4% –
Shareholder yield – 1.4% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBZUNDASHBLIV
Forward P/E 8.3xFY2026 60.6xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $0.44FY2026 $2.78FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY – +30.5%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +86.4% +79.1% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.71BFY2026 $18.88BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +20.7%FY2026 +37.6%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after -5.1% +11.2% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBZUNDASHBLIV
Held by institutions 23.6% 88.2% –
Institutions holding 69 1,043 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +11.5% +7.4% –
Institutions buying 21 578 –
Institutions selling 23 349 –
Buyers to sellers 0.91 1.66 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BZUNDASHBLIV
BZUN 1.00 0.16 0.02
DASH 0.16 1.00 0.02
BLIV 0.02 0.02 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BZUN, DASH and BLIV?

DoorDash (DASH) is the largest by market capitalisation: Baozun (BZUN) $193.72M, DoorDash (DASH) $74.12B, BeLive Holdings (BLIV) $24.99M.

Which company is growing faster?

DoorDash (DASH) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Baozun (BZUN) +12.1%, DoorDash (DASH) +33.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

DoorDash (DASH) has the highest net margin (Baozun (BZUN) -1.3%, DoorDash (DASH) 5.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Baozun (BZUN) returned the most: Baozun (BZUN) +0.8%, DoorDash (DASH) -34.8%, BeLive Holdings (BLIV) -37.0%. Over five years, DoorDash (DASH) compounded fastest (Baozun (BZUN) -27.1%/yr, DoorDash (DASH) -3.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, DoorDash (DASH) has been the steadiest (Baozun (BZUN) 51.4%, DoorDash (DASH) 50.1%, BeLive Holdings (BLIV) 82.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BZUN, DASH and BLIV?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, DoorDash (DASH) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.