BWMX vs YSG vs INVU Stock Comparison

Betterware De Mexico, S.A.P.I. De C.V, Yatsen Holding and Investview Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
YSG Yatsen Holding Ltd
$2.32 -9.0% 1M -67.8% 1Y
Market cap
$435.52M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$653.85M
Div. yield
–
Cosmetics Consumer Staples
INVU Investview, Inc.
$0.02 0.0% 1M -33.3% 1Y
Market cap
$36.90M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$19.98M
Div. yield
–
Technology Distribution Technology

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Betterware De Mexico, S.A.P.I. De C.V leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Betterware De Mexico, S.A.P.I. De C.V 7). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBWMXYSGINVULeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $639.23M $435.52M $36.90M BWMX
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 8.5x -9.4x — –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 8.3x — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +28.1% +25.6% -54.2% BWMX
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 8.1% -3.5% — BWMX
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 29.4% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.0x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 7.41% — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +20.6% -67.8% -33.3% BWMX
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -8.8%/yr -30.2%/yr -27.5%/yr BWMX
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 35.8% 82.4% 194.4% BWMX
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 84/100 69/100 — BWMX

Percentile Scorecard

BWMXYSGINVU

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBWMXYSGINVU
Valuation 96 #3 of 52 63 #20 of 52 –
Growth 92 #5 of 50 82 #10 of 50 –
Profitability 98 #2 of 45 50 #23 of 45 –
Financial Health 36 #36 of 56 84 #10 of 56 –
Shareholder Returns 97 #2 of 31 – –
Overall 84 69 –
  • BWMX ranked among 60 companies in Household and Personal Products
  • YSG ranked among 60 companies in Household and Personal Products
  • INVU ranked among 65 companies in Technology Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBWMXYSGINVUSPY
1 month +2.1%-9.0%0.0% +0.7%
3 months -2.8%-33.3%0.0% +3.7%
6 months +0.7%-20.3%-33.3% +7.1%
Year to date +20.5%-40.4%-33.3% +12.8%
1 year +20.6%-67.8%-33.3% +11.9%
3 years +49.7%-50.5%+100.0% +85.2%
3 years, per year +14.4%-20.9%+26.0% +22.8%
5 years -37.0%-83.4%-80.0% +67.6%
5 years, per year -8.8%-30.2%-27.5% +10.9%
10 years ——+100.0% +262.0%
10 years, per year ——+7.2% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureBWMXYSGINVUSPY
Volatility, 1Y 35.8%82.4%194.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 30.7%93.7%901.4% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.581.131.66 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.58-0.82-0.17 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -77.3%-88.1%-91.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -11.9%-67.8%-33.3% -1.2%
52-week high $19.44$7.21$0.03 $779.14
52-week low $13.56$2.19$0.01 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBWMXYSGINVU
P/E now vs peer median 8.5xmedian 18.7x -9.4xmedian 18.7x —median 17.5x
P/S now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 1.5x 0.7xmedian 1.5x 1.8xmedian 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 5.6xmedian 13.0x —median 13.0x —median 10.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 3.5xmedian 18.9x —median 18.9x —median 13.3x
P/B now vs peer median 4.7xmedian 2.2x 1.1xmedian 2.2x —median 1.5x
PEG now vs peer median 0.55median 1.01 0.96median 1.01 —median 1.28

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBWMXYSGINVU
Revenue $926.97M $653.85M $19.98M
Gross profit $468.65M $505.96M –
Operating income $265.18M -$47.33M –
Net income $76.07M -$31.82M –
Free cash flow $182.16M – –
R&D – $22.34M –
EPS (diluted) $2.02 $-0.25 –
Cash & equivalents $28.94M $104.68M –
Total debt $1.26B – –
Shares (diluted) 37.24M 93.13M 1.85B
Enterprise value $479.21M -$136.59M $36.90M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBWMXYSGINVU
P/E 8.5x -9.4x –
P/FCF 3.5x – –
P/Operating cash flow 3.7x – –
P/S 0.7x 0.7x 1.8x
P/B 4.7x 1.1x –
P/Tangible book -5.5x 1.4x –
EV/EBITDA 5.6x – –
EV/EBIT 3.8x -5.9x –
EV/Revenue 1.1x 0.4x 1.8x
EV/FCF 5.5x – –
EV/Operating cash flow 5.8x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.55 0.96 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBWMXYSGINVU
Revenue growth (1Y) 28.1% 25.6% -54.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 9.6% 9.6% -30.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -3.8% 24.9% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -2.5% 12.2% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 152.8% 45.0% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 32.1% 11.5% –
Net income growth (1Y) 44.8% 56.2% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 8.5% 11.0% –
EPS growth (1Y) 43.8% -537.4% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 15.5% -9.9% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 99.6% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -1.0% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 104.0% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 68.6% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBWMXYSGINVU
Gross margin 50.6% 77.4% –
EBITDA margin 19.2% – –
Operating margin 28.6% -7.2% –
Pretax margin 13.6% -4.6% –
Net margin 8.1% -3.5% –
FCF margin 19.7% – –
Operating cash flow margin 18.5% – –
Return on equity 56.6% -7.8% –
Return on assets 9.0% -5.7% –
Return on invested capital 29.4% – –
Return on capital employed 49.9% -10.1% –
Asset turnover 1.1x 1.2x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.3x – –
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBWMXYSGINVU
Debt / assets 47.0% – –
Debt / equity 2.9x – –
Net debt / EBITDA 2.0x – –
Debt / FCF 2.1x – –
Liabilities / assets 83.6% 32.0% –
Equity / assets 16.4% 68.0% –
Interest coverage 6.2x – –
Current ratio 1.0x 3.7x –
Quick ratio 0.4x 2.1x –
Cash ratio 0.1x 1.7x –
Altman Z-score 2.89 -0.19 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBWMXYSGINVU
Dividend yield 7.4% – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 7.4% – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBWMXYSGINVU
Forward P/E 8.3xFY2026 – –
EPS, next fiscal year $2.06FY2026 $-0.16FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY +32.9%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after +22.8% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.02BFY2026 $638.64MFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +28.3%FY2026 +3.9%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +13.8% +13.5% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBWMXYSGINVU
Held by institutions 12.9% 6.8% –
Institutions holding 46 43 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.5% -11.7% –
Institutions buying 24 15 –
Institutions selling 14 18 –
Buyers to sellers 1.71 0.83 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BWMXYSGINVU
BWMX 1.00 0.15 0.01
YSG 0.15 1.00 0.04
INVU 0.01 0.04 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BWMX, YSG and INVU?

Betterware De Mexico, S.A.P.I. De C.V (BWMX) is the largest by market capitalisation: Betterware De Mexico, S.A.P.I. De C.V (BWMX) $639.23M, Yatsen Holding (YSG) $435.52M, Investview (INVU) $36.90M.

Which company is growing faster?

Betterware De Mexico, S.A.P.I. De C.V (BWMX) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Betterware De Mexico, S.A.P.I. De C.V (BWMX) +28.1%, Yatsen Holding (YSG) +25.6%, Investview (INVU) -54.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Betterware De Mexico, S.A.P.I. De C.V (BWMX) has the highest net margin (Betterware De Mexico, S.A.P.I. De C.V (BWMX) 8.1%, Yatsen Holding (YSG) -3.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Betterware De Mexico, S.A.P.I. De C.V (BWMX) returned the most: Betterware De Mexico, S.A.P.I. De C.V (BWMX) +20.6%, Yatsen Holding (YSG) -67.8%, Investview (INVU) -33.3%. Over five years, Betterware De Mexico, S.A.P.I. De C.V (BWMX) compounded fastest (Betterware De Mexico, S.A.P.I. De C.V (BWMX) -8.8%/yr, Yatsen Holding (YSG) -30.2%/yr, Investview (INVU) -27.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Betterware De Mexico, S.A.P.I. De C.V (BWMX) 7.41%. Yatsen Holding (YSG) and Investview (INVU) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Betterware De Mexico, S.A.P.I. De C.V (BWMX) has been the steadiest (Betterware De Mexico, S.A.P.I. De C.V (BWMX) 35.8%, Yatsen Holding (YSG) 82.4%, Investview (INVU) 194.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BWMX, YSG and INVU?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Betterware De Mexico, S.A.P.I. De C.V (BWMX) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.