BWLP vs SGU vs TMDE Stock Comparison

Bw Lpg, Star and TMD Energy Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BWLP BW LPG Ltd
$25.51 +5.4% 1M +101.5% 1Y
Market cap
$3.86B
P/E
13.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.61B
Div. yield
82.01%
Fuel Distribution Energy
6 wins
SGU Star Group, L.P.
$12.86 +0.6% 1M +8.3% 1Y
Market cap
$421.95M
P/E
4.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.91B
Div. yield
6.10%
Fuel Distribution Energy
5 wins
TMDE TMD Energy Ltd
$0.58 -13.4% 1M -26.8% 1Y
Market cap
$13.67M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Fuel Distribution Energy

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Bw Lpg leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Bw Lpg 6, Star 5). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBWLPSGUTMDELeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.86B $421.95M $13.67M BWLP
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 13.6x 4.9x -1.5x SGU
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 5.6x — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -2.5% +7.6% — SGU
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 10.9% 4.5% — BWLP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 13.0% 15.3% — SGU
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.8x 0.8x — BWLP
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 82.01% 6.10% — BWLP
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +101.5% +8.3% -26.8% BWLP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +37.6%/yr +2.7%/yr — BWLP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 39.4% 17.1% 218.6% SGU
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 62/100 68/100 — SGU

Percentile Scorecard

BWLPSGUTMDE

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBWLPSGUTMDE
Valuation 41 #14 of 23 96 #2 of 23 68 #8 of 23
Growth 0 #19 of 19 50 #10 of 19 –
Profitability 82 #4 of 18 53 #9 of 18 –
Financial Health 87 #4 of 24 52 #12 of 24 13 #21 of 24
Shareholder Returns 100 #1 of 18 88 #3 of 18 –
Overall 62 68 –
  • BWLP ranked among 25 companies in Refining and Marketing
  • SGU ranked among 25 companies in Refining and Marketing
  • TMDE ranked among 25 companies in Refining and Marketing

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBWLPSGUTMDESPY
1 month +5.4%+0.6%-13.4% -0.2%
3 months +19.0%+1.6%-20.5% +3.9%
6 months +29.4%+2.0%-54.0% +8.2%
Year to date +94.7%+8.6%+36.5% +12.9%
1 year +101.5%+8.3%-26.8% +12.3%
3 years +93.3%+11.3%— +87.4%
3 years, per year +24.6%+3.6%— +23.3%
5 years +392.5%+14.4%— +67.9%
5 years, per year +37.6%+2.7%— +10.9%
10 years +709.8%+34.0%— +261.1%
10 years, per year +23.3%+3.0%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureBWLPSGUTMDESPY
Volatility, 1Y 39.4%17.1%218.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 41.0%16.9%161.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.370.14-2.11 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.570.49-0.12 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -61.2%-34.0%-92.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -3.0%-4.4%-85.6% -1.2%
52-week high $26.31$13.45$4.04 $779.14
52-week low $11.99$11.47$0.41 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBWLPSGUTMDE
P/E now vs peer median 13.6xmedian 9.2x 4.9xmedian 9.2x -1.5xmedian 9.2x
P/S now vs peer median 1.5xmedian 0.3x 0.2xmedian 0.3x 0.1xmedian 0.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 7.0xmedian 7.0x 3.3xmedian 7.0x —median 7.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 5.4xmedian 8.9x 7.4xmedian 8.9x —median 8.9x
P/B now vs peer median 1.9xmedian 1.8x 1.1xmedian 1.8x 1.0xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.34 0.02median 0.34 —median 0.34

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBWLPSGUTMDE
Revenue $2.61B $1.91B –
Gross profit – $292.10M –
Operating income $360.05M $136.40M –
Net income $504.96M $87.41M –
Free cash flow $721.10M $56.83M –
EPS (diluted) $1.87 $2.64 –
Cash & equivalents $303.86M $27.00M $8.41M
Total debt $3.13B $172.57M $293.09M
Shares (diluted) 151.90M 32.84M 21.36M
Enterprise value $2.98B $323.15M -$21.92M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBWLPSGUTMDE
P/E 13.6x 4.9x -1.5x
P/FCF 5.4x 7.4x –
P/Operating cash flow 10.4x 5.9x –
P/S 1.5x 0.2x 0.1x
P/B 1.9x 1.1x 1.0x
P/Tangible book 1.9x 1.5x 1.0x
EV/EBITDA 7.0x 3.3x –
EV/EBIT 12.1x 4.2x –
EV/Revenue 1.7x 0.3x –
EV/FCF 6.1x 10.0x –
EV/Operating cash flow 11.8x 7.9x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.02 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBWLPSGUTMDE
Revenue growth (1Y) -2.5% 7.6% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -1.2% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 552.6% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -14.5% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 11.0% 27.7% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 97.8% –
Net income growth (1Y) 86.9% 30.3% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 273.3% –
EPS growth (1Y) -68.3% 36.2% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 284.0% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -32.7% -24.7% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -24.7% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -37.3% -30.5% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -28.3% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBWLPSGUTMDE
Gross margin – 15.3% –
EBITDA margin 24.0% 9.0% –
Operating margin 13.8% 7.1% –
Pretax margin 13.1% 6.5% –
Net margin 10.9% 4.5% –
FCF margin 27.6% 3.0% –
Operating cash flow margin 14.2% 3.7% –
Return on equity 24.8% 21.5% –
Return on assets 15.0% 8.0% –
Return on invested capital 13.0% 15.3% –
Return on capital employed 13.4% 18.2% –
Asset turnover 0.8x 1.8x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.7x 0.8x –
Stock comp / revenue 0.0% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBWLPSGUTMDE
Debt / assets 24.0% 17.1% 73.7%
Debt / equity 0.4x 0.4x 6.8x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.8x 0.8x –
Debt / FCF 1.1x 3.0x –
Liabilities / assets 39.4% 61.5% 89.2%
Equity / assets 60.6% 38.5% 10.8%
Interest coverage 3.8x – –
Current ratio 1.4x 0.9x 0.8x
Quick ratio 1.1x 0.6x 0.4x
Cash ratio 0.5x 0.1x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 3.25 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBWLPSGUTMDE
Dividend yield 82.0% 6.1% –
Net buyback yield – 2.6% –
Shareholder yield 82.0% 8.7% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBWLPSGUTMDE
Forward P/E 5.6xFY2026 – –
EPS, next fiscal year $4.57FY2026 – –
EPS growth, next FY +290.6%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after -59.3% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.20BFY2026 – –
Revenue growth, next FY +69.7%FY2026 – –
Revenue growth, the year after -31.6% – –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBWLPSGUTMDE
Held by institutions – 41.8% –
Institutions holding – 73 –
Change in shares held, QoQ – -0.1% –
Institutions buying – 28 –
Institutions selling – 16 –
Buyers to sellers – 1.75 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BWLPSGUTMDE
BWLP 1.00 0.08 0.06
SGU 0.08 1.00 -0.01
TMDE 0.06 -0.01 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BWLP, SGU and TMDE?

Bw Lpg (BWLP) is the largest by market capitalisation: Bw Lpg (BWLP) $3.86B, Star (SGU) $421.95M, TMD Energy (TMDE) $13.67M.

Which stock is cheaper, BWLP, SGU and TMDE?

Star (SGU) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Bw Lpg (BWLP) 13.6x, Star (SGU) 4.9x, TMD Energy (TMDE) -1.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Star (SGU) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Bw Lpg (BWLP) -2.5%, Star (SGU) +7.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Bw Lpg (BWLP) has the highest net margin (Bw Lpg (BWLP) 10.9%, Star (SGU) 4.5%). On return on invested capital, Star (SGU) leads (Bw Lpg (BWLP) 13.0%, Star (SGU) 15.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Bw Lpg (BWLP) returned the most: Bw Lpg (BWLP) +101.5%, Star (SGU) +8.3%, TMD Energy (TMDE) -26.8%. Over five years, Bw Lpg (BWLP) compounded fastest (Bw Lpg (BWLP) +37.6%/yr, Star (SGU) +2.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Bw Lpg (BWLP) has the highest dividend yield: Bw Lpg (BWLP) 82.01%, Star (SGU) 6.10%. TMD Energy (TMDE) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Star (SGU) has been the steadiest (Bw Lpg (BWLP) 39.4%, Star (SGU) 17.1%, TMD Energy (TMDE) 218.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BWLP, SGU and TMDE?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Bw Lpg (BWLP) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.