BWLP vs MUSA vs CPK Stock Comparison

Bw Lpg, Murphy USA and Chesapeake Utilities Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BWLP BW LPG Ltd
$25.88 +4.9% 1M +92.0% 1Y
Market cap
$3.79B
P/E
13.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.61B
Div. yield
–
Fuel Distribution Energy
6 wins
MUSA Murphy USA Inc.
$540.50 +6.5% 1M +37.8% 1Y
Market cap
$9.87B
P/E
14.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$23.26B
Div. yield
–
Convenience Stores Consumer Staples
2 wins
CPK Chesapeake Utilities Corp
$135.43 +5.7% 1M +5.4% 1Y
Market cap
$3.28B
P/E
21.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$993.50M
Div. yield
0.02%
Regulated Electric Utilities Utilities
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Bw Lpg leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Bw Lpg 6, Chesapeake Utilities 3, Murphy USA 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBWLPMUSACPKLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.79B $9.87B $3.28B MUSA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 13.3x 14.9x 21.8x BWLP
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 5.7x 15.2x 21.7x BWLP
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -2.5% +20.2% +14.6% MUSA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 10.9% — 15.1% CPK
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 13.0% — 6.6% BWLP
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.8x — 4.7x BWLP
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.02% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +92.0% +37.8% +5.4% BWLP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +37.1%/yr +27.1%/yr +0.7%/yr BWLP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 39.2% 39.9% 20.1% CPK
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 58/100 50/100 65/100 CPK

Percentile Scorecard

BWLPMUSACPK

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBWLPMUSACPK
Valuation 32 #16 of 23 54 #19 of 40 36 #43 of 67
Growth 0 #19 of 19 78 #9 of 38 94 #5 of 65
Profitability 77 #5 of 18 94 #3 of 36 74 #17 of 63
Financial Health 83 #5 of 24 13 #35 of 40 59 #26 of 62
Shareholder Returns 100 #1 of 18 11 #25 of 28 61 #27 of 67
Overall 58 50 65
  • BWLP ranked among 25 companies in Refining and Marketing
  • MUSA ranked among 41 companies in Staples Retail
  • CPK ranked among 67 companies in Regulated Utilities

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBWLPMUSACPKSPY
1 month +4.9%+6.5%+5.7% +0.7%
3 months +15.4%-12.4%+1.7% +3.7%
6 months +29.8%-8.1%+7.4% +7.1%
Year to date +97.6%+33.9%+8.6% +12.8%
1 year +92.0%+37.8%+5.4% +11.9%
3 years +88.4%+49.7%+52.8% +85.2%
3 years, per year +23.5%+14.4%+15.2% +22.8%
5 years +384.6%+231.7%+3.3% +67.6%
5 years, per year +37.1%+27.1%+0.7% +10.9%
10 years +721.6%+681.0%+114.6% +262.0%
10 years, per year +23.4%+22.8%+7.9% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureBWLPMUSACPKSPY
Volatility, 1Y 39.2%39.9%20.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 41.0%40.5%20.8% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.37-0.69-0.24 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.350.950.27 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -61.2%-35.8%-40.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -1.6%-13.3%-2.6% -1.2%
52-week high $26.31$623.43$139.06 $779.14
52-week low $11.99$356.57$118.97 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBWLPMUSACPK
P/E now vs peer median 13.8xmedian 8.8x 15.0xmedian 22.1x 21.7xmedian 20.5x
P/S now vs peer median 1.5xmedian 0.2x 0.4xmedian 0.5x 3.3xmedian 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 7.1xmedian 7.0x —median 9.5x 13.6xmedian 13.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 5.4xmedian 7.5x 17.2xmedian 16.0x -16.9xmedian 40.5x
P/B now vs peer median 1.9xmedian 1.7x 12.5xmedian 2.8x 2.0xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.34 1.07median 1.07 2.75median 2.14

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBWLPMUSACPK
Revenue $2.61B $23.26B $993.50M
Gross profit – – $669.70M
Operating income $360.05M $980.10M $271.10M
Net income $504.96M $663.30M $150.20M
Free cash flow $721.10M – -$193.50M
EPS (diluted) $1.87 $35.75 $6.21
Cash & equivalents $303.86M $161.80M $400.00K
Total debt $3.13B – $1.69B
Shares (diluted) 151.90M 18.55M 24.17M
Enterprise value $2.77B $9.87B $3.27B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBWLPMUSACPK
P/E 13.8x 15.0x 21.7x
P/FCF 5.4x 17.2x -16.9x
P/Operating cash flow 10.5x 8.6x 10.6x
P/S 1.5x 0.4x 3.3x
P/B 1.9x 12.5x 2.0x
P/Tangible book 1.9x 15.2x 2.0x
EV/EBITDA 7.1x – 13.6x
EV/EBIT 12.3x – 18.3x
EV/Revenue 1.7x 0.4x 5.0x
EV/FCF 6.1x – -25.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 11.9x 8.6x 16.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 1.07 2.75

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBWLPMUSACPK
Revenue growth (1Y) -2.5% 20.2% 14.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 2.1% 13.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 11.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 11.0% 38.4% 10.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 7.8% 23.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 86.9% 40.8% 16.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 8.1% 19.4%
EPS growth (1Y) -68.3% 45.9% 12.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 14.1% 7.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -32.7% 40.6% 45.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 16.1% 18.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -37.3% – 3.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -102.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBWLPMUSACPK
Gross margin – – 67.4%
EBITDA margin 24.0% – 36.5%
Operating margin 13.8% – 27.3%
Pretax margin 13.1% – 20.8%
Net margin 10.9% – 15.1%
FCF margin 27.6% – -19.5%
Operating cash flow margin 14.2% 4.9% 31.0%
Return on equity 24.8% 84.1% 9.0%
Return on assets 15.0% 12.9% 3.6%
Return on invested capital 13.0% – 6.6%
Return on capital employed 13.4% – 7.7%
Asset turnover 0.8x 4.5x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.7x 1.7x 2.1x
Stock comp / revenue 0.0% – 0.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBWLPMUSACPK
Debt / assets 24.0% – 40.4%
Debt / equity 0.4x – 1.0x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.8x – 4.7x
Debt / FCF 1.1x – -8.7x
Liabilities / assets 39.4% 84.7% 59.9%
Equity / assets 60.6% 15.3% 40.1%
Interest coverage 3.8x – 3.7x
Current ratio 1.4x 0.9x 0.3x
Quick ratio 1.1x – 0.2x
Cash ratio 0.5x – 0.0x
Altman Z-score 3.27 – 1.35

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBWLPMUSACPK
Dividend yield 80.8% 0.5% 2.1%
Net buyback yield – – -2.4%
Shareholder yield 80.8% 0.5% -0.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 42.7%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – -33.1%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 11.7%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 19.4%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBWLPMUSACPK
Forward P/E 5.7xFY2026 15.2xFY2026 21.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.57FY2026 $35.60FY2026 $6.24FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +290.6%FY2026 +43.0%FY2026 +3.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -59.3% -7.9% +15.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.20BFY2026 $22.85BFY2026 $1.09BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +69.7%FY2026 +17.9%FY2026 +17.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -31.6% -5.8% +4.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBWLPMUSACPK
Held by institutions – 83.0% 92.3%
Institutions holding – 607 334
Change in shares held, QoQ – -2.2% +4.2%
Institutions buying – 311 188
Institutions selling – 190 99
Buyers to sellers – 1.64 1.90

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BWLPMUSACPK
BWLP 1.00 0.12 -0.06
MUSA 0.12 1.00 0.05
CPK -0.06 0.05 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BWLP, MUSA and CPK?

Murphy USA (MUSA) is the largest by market capitalisation: Bw Lpg (BWLP) $3.79B, Murphy USA (MUSA) $9.87B, Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) $3.28B.

Which stock is cheaper, BWLP, MUSA and CPK?

Bw Lpg (BWLP) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Bw Lpg (BWLP) 13.3x, Murphy USA (MUSA) 14.9x, Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) 21.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Bw Lpg (BWLP) is cheapest (Bw Lpg (BWLP) 5.7x, Murphy USA (MUSA) 15.2x, Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) 21.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Murphy USA (MUSA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Bw Lpg (BWLP) -2.5%, Murphy USA (MUSA) +20.2%, Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) +14.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) has the highest net margin (Bw Lpg (BWLP) 10.9%, Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) 15.1%). On return on invested capital, Bw Lpg (BWLP) leads (Bw Lpg (BWLP) 13.0%, Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) 6.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Bw Lpg (BWLP) returned the most: Bw Lpg (BWLP) +92.0%, Murphy USA (MUSA) +37.8%, Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) +5.4%. Over five years, Bw Lpg (BWLP) compounded fastest (Bw Lpg (BWLP) +37.1%/yr, Murphy USA (MUSA) +27.1%/yr, Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) +0.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Bw Lpg (BWLP) 0.00%, Murphy USA (MUSA) 0.00%, Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) 0.02%. Bw Lpg (BWLP) and Murphy USA (MUSA) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) has been the steadiest (Bw Lpg (BWLP) 39.2%, Murphy USA (MUSA) 39.9%, Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) 20.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BWLP, MUSA and CPK?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Bw Lpg (BWLP) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.