BWLP vs ET vs UGP Stock Comparison

Bw Lpg, Energy Transfer and Ultrapar Holdings Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BWLP BW LPG Ltd
$26.04 +7.6% 1M +109.8% 1Y
Market cap
$3.86B
P/E
13.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.61B
Div. yield
–
Fuel Distribution Energy
4 wins
ET Energy Transfer LP
$20.61 +2.0% 1M +23.2% 1Y
Market cap
$70.32B
P/E
13.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$107.38B
Div. yield
0.07%
Oil and Gas Pipelines Energy
3 wins
UGP Ultrapar Holdings Inc
$6.55 -7.6% 1M +69.3% 1Y
Market cap
$6.85B
P/E
9.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$29.04B
Div. yield
–
Fuel Distribution Energy
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Ultrapar Holdings leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Ultrapar Holdings 4, Bw Lpg 4, Energy Transfer 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBWLPETUGPLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.86B $70.32B $6.85B ET
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 13.6x 13.9x 9.9x UGP
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 5.7x 11.5x 7.1x BWLP
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -2.5% +33.3% +20.1% ET
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 10.9% 4.7% 2.4% BWLP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 13.0% 8.4% 463.0% UGP
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.8x 4.0x -3.9x UGP
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.07% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +109.8% +23.2% +69.3% BWLP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +38.2%/yr +16.2%/yr +21.6%/yr BWLP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 39.4% 17.5% 38.6% ET
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 61/100 63/100 71/100 UGP

Percentile Scorecard

BWLPETUGP

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBWLPETUGP
Valuation 36 #15 of 23 94 #3 of 35 91 #3 of 23
Growth 0 #19 of 19 61 #14 of 34 61 #8 of 19
Profitability 82 #4 of 18 30 #24 of 34 65 #7 of 18
Financial Health 87 #4 of 24 59 #15 of 35 78 #6 of 24
Shareholder Returns 100 #1 of 18 70 #10 of 31 59 #8 of 18
Overall 61 63 71
  • BWLP ranked among 25 companies in Refining and Marketing
  • ET ranked among 35 companies in Oil and Gas Midstream
  • UGP ranked among 25 companies in Refining and Marketing

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBWLPETUGPSPY
1 month +7.6%+2.0%-7.6% -0.8%
3 months +23.6%+3.5%+4.5% +3.5%
6 months +38.7%+8.2%+12.9% +7.0%
Year to date +98.8%+25.0%+73.7% +12.2%
1 year +109.8%+23.2%+69.3% +13.0%
3 years +97.3%+57.2%+61.7% +86.3%
3 years, per year +25.4%+16.3%+17.4% +23.1%
5 years +402.7%+111.8%+165.2% +68.6%
5 years, per year +38.2%+16.2%+21.6% +11.0%
10 years +726.7%+30.9%-43.1% +258.0%
10 years, per year +23.5%+2.7%-5.5% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureBWLPETUGPSPY
Volatility, 1Y 39.4%17.5%38.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 41.1%16.6%44.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.38-0.210.57 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.791.331.79 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -61.2%-25.8%-59.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -1.0%-5.2%-17.7% -1.8%
52-week high $26.31$21.74$7.96 $779.14
52-week low $11.99$16.21$3.63 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBWLPETUGP
P/E now vs peer median 13.9xmedian 9.5x 14.1xmedian 21.0x 10.1xmedian 9.5x
P/S now vs peer median 1.5xmedian 0.3x 0.7xmedian 2.7x 0.2xmedian 0.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 7.1xmedian 7.3x 8.2xmedian 11.0x 0.8xmedian 7.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 5.5xmedian 9.5x 13.6xmedian 16.6x 4.0xmedian 9.5x
P/B now vs peer median 1.9xmedian 1.9x 1.4xmedian 2.6x 1.8xmedian 1.9x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.35 2.01median 1.92 0.64median 0.35

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBWLPETUGP
Revenue $2.61B $107.38B $29.04B
Gross profit – $25.32B $2.00B
Operating income $360.05M $10.78B $1.14B
Net income $504.96M $7.04B $1.16B
Free cash flow $721.10M $5.22B $1.75B
EPS (diluted) $1.87 $1.46 $0.63
Cash & equivalents $303.86M $1.02B $2.06B
Total debt $3.13B $68.41B -$3.45B
Shares (diluted) 151.90M 3.46B 1.10B
Enterprise value $2.85B $63.51B -$381.88M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBWLPETUGP
P/E 13.9x 14.1x 10.1x
P/FCF 5.5x 13.6x 4.0x
P/Operating cash flow 10.6x 5.9x 3.5x
P/S 1.5x 0.7x 0.2x
P/B 1.9x 1.4x 1.8x
P/Tangible book 1.9x 1.6x 1.8x
EV/EBITDA 7.1x 8.2x 0.8x
EV/EBIT 12.4x 12.8x 1.1x
EV/Revenue 1.7x 1.3x 0.0x
EV/FCF 6.2x 26.5x 0.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 12.0x 11.4x 0.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 2.01 0.64

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBWLPETUGP
Revenue growth (1Y) -2.5% 33.3% 20.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 10.0% 3.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 18.9% -19.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 13.2% -1.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) 11.0% 16.5% -36.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 12.0% 25.4%
Net income growth (1Y) 86.9% 16.1% 111.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 9.0% 61.6%
EPS growth (1Y) -68.3% 12.6% -0.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 7.0% 15.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -32.7% 8.8% 145.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 5.9% 28.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -37.3% -8.5% 58.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -7.3% 29.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBWLPETUGP
Gross margin – 23.6% 6.9%
EBITDA margin 24.0% 15.7% 5.1%
Operating margin 13.8% 10.0% 3.9%
Pretax margin 13.1% 7.1% 7.0%
Net margin 10.9% 4.7% 2.4%
FCF margin 27.6% 4.9% 6.0%
Operating cash flow margin 14.2% 11.3% 6.8%
Return on equity 24.8% 14.0% 35.3%
Return on assets 15.0% 4.8% 13.4%
Return on invested capital 13.0% 8.4% 463.0%
Return on capital employed 13.4% 8.4% 16.3%
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.7x 3.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.7x 1.7x 1.7x
Stock comp / revenue 0.0% 0.2% 0.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBWLPETUGP
Debt / assets 24.0% 46.2% -34.5%
Debt / equity 0.4x 1.4x -0.9x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.8x 4.0x -3.9x
Debt / FCF 1.1x 13.1x -2.0x
Liabilities / assets 39.4% 65.9% 61.3%
Equity / assets 60.6% 34.1% 38.7%
Interest coverage 3.8x 2.9x 1.6x
Current ratio 1.4x 1.2x 1.6x
Quick ratio 1.1x 0.9x 0.9x
Cash ratio 0.5x 0.1x 0.8x
Altman Z-score 3.28 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBWLPETUGP
Dividend yield 80.3% 6.5% 5.8%
Net buyback yield – – 0.1%
Shareholder yield 80.3% 6.5% 5.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 67.9% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 91.6% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 2.9% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 8.0% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBWLPETUGP
Forward P/E 5.7xFY2026 11.5xFY2026 7.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.57FY2026 $1.80FY2026 $0.92FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +290.6%FY2026 +48.8%FY2026 +104.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -59.3% -9.4% -25.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.20BFY2026 $124.23BFY2026 $33.34BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +69.7%FY2026 +45.2%FY2026 +16.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -31.6% +1.4% -11.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBWLPETUGP
Held by institutions 16.1% 31.4% 5.2%
Institutions holding 105 1,279 177
Change in shares held, QoQ +18.9% +1.9% -10.2%
Institutions buying 62 628 98
Institutions selling 23 340 58
Buyers to sellers 2.70 1.85 1.69

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BWLPETUGP
BWLP 1.00 0.17 0.21
ET 0.17 1.00 0.07
UGP 0.21 0.07 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BWLP, ET and UGP?

Energy Transfer (ET) is the largest by market capitalisation: Bw Lpg (BWLP) $3.86B, Energy Transfer (ET) $70.32B, Ultrapar Holdings (UGP) $6.85B.

Which stock is cheaper, BWLP, ET and UGP?

Ultrapar Holdings (UGP) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Bw Lpg (BWLP) 13.6x, Energy Transfer (ET) 13.9x, Ultrapar Holdings (UGP) 9.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Bw Lpg (BWLP) is cheapest (Bw Lpg (BWLP) 5.7x, Energy Transfer (ET) 11.5x, Ultrapar Holdings (UGP) 7.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Energy Transfer (ET) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Bw Lpg (BWLP) -2.5%, Energy Transfer (ET) +33.3%, Ultrapar Holdings (UGP) +20.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Bw Lpg (BWLP) has the highest net margin (Bw Lpg (BWLP) 10.9%, Energy Transfer (ET) 4.7%, Ultrapar Holdings (UGP) 2.4%). On return on invested capital, Ultrapar Holdings (UGP) leads (Bw Lpg (BWLP) 13.0%, Energy Transfer (ET) 8.4%, Ultrapar Holdings (UGP) 463.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Bw Lpg (BWLP) returned the most: Bw Lpg (BWLP) +109.8%, Energy Transfer (ET) +23.2%, Ultrapar Holdings (UGP) +69.3%. Over five years, Bw Lpg (BWLP) compounded fastest (Bw Lpg (BWLP) +38.2%/yr, Energy Transfer (ET) +16.2%/yr, Ultrapar Holdings (UGP) +21.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Bw Lpg (BWLP) 0.00%, Energy Transfer (ET) 0.07%, Ultrapar Holdings (UGP) 0.00%. Bw Lpg (BWLP) and Ultrapar Holdings (UGP) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Energy Transfer (ET) has been the steadiest (Bw Lpg (BWLP) 39.4%, Energy Transfer (ET) 17.5%, Ultrapar Holdings (UGP) 38.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BWLP, ET and UGP?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ultrapar Holdings (UGP) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.