BWA vs CAT vs OSK Stock Comparison

Borgwarner, Caterpillar and Oshkosh Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BWA Borgwarner Inc
$54.94 -9.2% 1M +25.7% 1Y
Market cap
$11.19B
P/E
27.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$14.34B
Div. yield
0.01%
Heavy Equipment Industrials
2 wins
CAT Caterpillar Inc
$686.82 -15.5% 1M +32.0% 1Y
Market cap
$318.29B
P/E
29.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$74.73B
Div. yield
0.01%
Heavy Equipment Industrials
6 wins
OSK Oshkosh Corp
$131.73 -2.8% 1M -5.8% 1Y
Market cap
$8.32B
P/E
14.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$10.61B
Div. yield
–
Heavy Equipment Industrials
4 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Caterpillar leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Caterpillar 6, Oshkosh 4, Borgwarner 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBWACATOSKLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $11.19B $318.29B $8.32B CAT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 27.0x 29.4x 14.9x OSK
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 10.2x 26.6x 13.2x BWA
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +2.2% +18.4% +2.2% CAT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 2.9% 14.5% 5.2% CAT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 5.0% 15.9% 11.4% CAT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 2.5x 0.7x OSK
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.01% 0.00% BWA
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +25.7% +32.0% -5.8% CAT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +4.0%/yr +27.9%/yr +4.5%/yr CAT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 40.8% 40.4% 40.4% OSK
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 63/100 50/100 72/100 OSK

Percentile Scorecard

BWACATOSK

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBWACATOSK
Valuation 93 #16 of 203 22 #159 of 203 95 #11 of 203
Growth 47 #101 of 188 68 #61 of 188 59 #78 of 188
Profitability 50 #94 of 187 91 #17 of 187 63 #69 of 187
Financial Health 46 #120 of 222 16 #186 of 222 51 #110 of 222
Shareholder Returns 78 #34 of 153 53 #72 of 153 91 #14 of 153
Overall 63 50 72
  • BWA ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • CAT ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • OSK ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBWACATOSKSPY
1 month -9.2%-15.5%-2.8% -1.0%
3 months -14.7%-22.7%-15.1% +2.9%
6 months -2.4%-17.3%-12.4% +6.4%
Year to date +21.9%+19.9%+4.9% +11.4%
1 year +25.7%+32.0%-5.8% +13.1%
3 years +43.1%+175.2%+48.4% +79.4%
3 years, per year +12.7%+40.2%+14.1% +21.5%
5 years +21.9%+242.3%+24.7% +67.7%
5 years, per year +4.0%+27.9%+4.5% +10.9%
10 years +57.9%+695.6%+146.1% +255.2%
10 years, per year +4.7%+23.0%+9.4% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureBWACATOSKSPY
Volatility, 1Y 40.8%40.4%40.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 33.9%39.9%40.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.281.831.38 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.630.79-0.14 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -51.1%-35.5%-43.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -28.7%-35.5%-26.0% -2.5%
52-week high $77.03$1,064.90$177.94 $779.14
52-week low $40.96$520.50$118.59 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBWACATOSK
P/E now vs peer median 26.9xmedian 25.9x 29.2xmedian 25.9x 14.8xmedian 25.9x
P/S now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 1.9x 4.2xmedian 1.9x 0.8xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 13.7x 22.9xmedian 13.7x 8.5xmedian 13.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 9.2xmedian 21.1x 35.1xmedian 21.1x 7.3xmedian 21.1x
P/B now vs peer median 1.9xmedian 2.3x 16.3xmedian 2.3x 1.8xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median -1.29median 1.19 2.24median 1.19 1.15median 1.19

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBWACATOSK
Revenue $14.34B $74.73B $10.61B
Gross profit $2.79B $25.66B $1.69B
Operating income $716.00M $13.09B $797.60M
Net income $478.00M $10.84B $556.30M
Free cash flow $1.21B $8.99B $1.12B
R&D – $2.27B –
EPS (diluted) $2.01 $23.45 $8.87
Cash & equivalents $2.45B $6.71B $403.60M
Total debt $3.87B $173.08B $4.56B
Shares (diluted) 206.30M 462.50M 62.75M
Enterprise value $2.15B $289.99B $6.97B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBWACATOSK
P/E 26.9x 29.2x 14.8x
P/FCF 9.2x 35.1x 7.3x
P/Operating cash flow 6.5x 23.3x 6.3x
P/S 0.8x 4.2x 0.8x
P/B 1.9x 16.3x 1.8x
P/Tangible book 2.1x 16.6x 2.1x
EV/EBITDA – 22.9x 8.5x
EV/EBIT 17.6x 27.1x 11.1x
EV/Revenue 0.9x 4.7x 0.8x
EV/FCF 10.4x 39.4x 7.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 7.3x 26.1x 6.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -1.29 2.24 1.15

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBWACATOSK
Revenue growth (1Y) 2.2% 18.4% 2.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 1.8% 4.9% 5.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 7.5% 11.7% -10.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 3.7% 5.6% 7.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) 49.2% 13.7% -16.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -14.3% 7.7% 8.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 81.1% 14.9% -14.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -21.1% 9.0% 11.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 109.0% 17.1% -11.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -20.8% 13.0% 12.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 1.5% 19.3% 60.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 14.9% 10.6% 57.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 2.2% 16.2% 99.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 43.9% 7.4% 49.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBWACATOSK
Gross margin 19.5% 34.3% 15.9%
EBITDA margin – 20.7% 9.8%
Operating margin 5.0% 17.5% 7.5%
Pretax margin 4.9% 18.6% 6.5%
Net margin 2.9% 14.5% 5.2%
FCF margin 8.5% 12.0% 10.6%
Operating cash flow margin 12.0% 18.2% 12.3%
Return on equity 8.4% 57.0% 12.4%
Return on assets 3.5% 10.9% 5.6%
Return on invested capital 5.0% 15.9% 11.4%
Return on capital employed 6.8% 22.1% 11.5%
Asset turnover 1.0x 0.8x 1.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 3.6x 1.3x 2.3x
Stock comp / revenue 0.7% – 0.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBWACATOSK
Debt / assets 27.8% 44.0% 11.0%
Debt / equity 0.7x 2.3x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA – 2.5x 0.7x
Debt / FCF 3.2x 5.0x 1.0x
Liabilities / assets 58.4% 81.1% 55.0%
Equity / assets 41.6% 18.9% 45.0%
Interest coverage – 6.8x 6.6x
Current ratio 2.1x 1.4x 1.7x
Quick ratio 1.7x 0.5x 0.7x
Cash ratio 0.7x 0.2x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 3.05 4.55 3.17

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBWACATOSK
Dividend yield 1.2% 0.7% 1.7%
Net buyback yield 5.8% 2.3% 4.3%
Shareholder yield 7.0% 3.0% 6.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) 29.3% 25.9% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 11.5% 31.3% –
Dividend growth (1Y) 45.8% 4.2% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -4.0% 4.1% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBWACATOSK
Forward P/E 10.2xFY2026 26.6xFY2026 13.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $5.38FY2026 $25.79FY2026 $10.00FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +9.6%FY2026 +35.3%FY2026 -7.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +2.8% +31.4% +46.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $13.71BFY2026 $84.12BFY2026 $10.70BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -4.2%FY2026 +24.5%FY2026 +2.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +0.8% +1.5% +5.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBWACATOSK
Held by institutions 100.0% 72.3% 100.0%
Institutions holding 815 4,055 598
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.7% +0.5% +5.1%
Institutions buying 419 1,886 309
Institutions selling 295 1,595 188
Buyers to sellers 1.42 1.18 1.64

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BWACATOSK
BWA 1.00 0.49 0.34
CAT 0.49 1.00 0.53
OSK 0.34 0.53 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BWA, CAT and OSK?

Caterpillar (CAT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Borgwarner (BWA) $11.19B, Caterpillar (CAT) $318.29B, Oshkosh (OSK) $8.32B.

Which stock is cheaper, BWA, CAT and OSK?

Oshkosh (OSK) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Borgwarner (BWA) 27.0x, Caterpillar (CAT) 29.4x, Oshkosh (OSK) 14.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Borgwarner (BWA) is cheapest (Borgwarner (BWA) 10.2x, Caterpillar (CAT) 26.6x, Oshkosh (OSK) 13.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Caterpillar (CAT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Borgwarner (BWA) +2.2%, Caterpillar (CAT) +18.4%, Oshkosh (OSK) +2.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Caterpillar (CAT) has the highest net margin (Borgwarner (BWA) 2.9%, Caterpillar (CAT) 14.5%, Oshkosh (OSK) 5.2%). On return on invested capital, Caterpillar (CAT) leads (Borgwarner (BWA) 5.0%, Caterpillar (CAT) 15.9%, Oshkosh (OSK) 11.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Caterpillar (CAT) returned the most: Borgwarner (BWA) +25.7%, Caterpillar (CAT) +32.0%, Oshkosh (OSK) -5.8%. Over five years, Caterpillar (CAT) compounded fastest (Borgwarner (BWA) +4.0%/yr, Caterpillar (CAT) +27.9%/yr, Oshkosh (OSK) +4.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Borgwarner (BWA) has the highest dividend yield: Borgwarner (BWA) 0.01%, Caterpillar (CAT) 0.01%, Oshkosh (OSK) 0.00%. Oshkosh (OSK) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Oshkosh (OSK) has been the steadiest (Borgwarner (BWA) 40.8%, Caterpillar (CAT) 40.4%, Oshkosh (OSK) 40.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BWA, CAT and OSK?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Caterpillar (CAT) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.