BVC vs RYAN vs WTW Stock Comparison

BitVentures, Ryan Specialty Holdings and Willis Towers Watson Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BVC BitVentures Ltd
$14.33 +26.3% 1M +1,094.2% 1Y
Market cap
$60.43M
P/E
17.7x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Insurance Brokers Financial Services
3 wins
WTW Willis Towers Watson Plc
$319.66 +8.7% 1M -2.2% 1Y
Market cap
$29.69B
P/E
19.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$10.10B
Div. yield
1.19%
Insurance Brokers Financial Services
7 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Willis Towers Watson leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Willis Towers Watson 7, BitVentures 3, Ryan Specialty Holdings 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBVCRYANWTWLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $60.43M $10.83B $29.69B WTW
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 17.7x 53.6x 19.2x BVC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 18.3x 15.7x WTW
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +14.4% +3.0% RYAN
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 3.1% 15.5% WTW
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 8.7% 12.5% WTW
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 4.6x 1.8x WTW
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 1.20% 1.19% RYAN
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +1,094.2% -20.8% -2.2% BVC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +18.0%/yr +2.6%/yr +5.2%/yr BVC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 267.1% 45.1% 31.8% WTW
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 35/100 44/100 WTW

Percentile Scorecard

BVCRYANWTW

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBVCRYANWTW
Valuation 9 #108 of 119 7 #111 of 119 17 #99 of 119
Growth – 55 #52 of 114 75 #29 of 114
Profitability – 49 #57 of 110 72 #32 of 110
Financial Health 100 #1 of 110 3 #107 of 110 21 #87 of 110
Shareholder Returns – 64 #39 of 106 37 #67 of 106
Overall – 35 44
  • BVC ranked among 126 companies in Insurance
  • RYAN ranked among 126 companies in Insurance
  • WTW ranked among 126 companies in Insurance

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBVCRYANWTWSPY
1 month +26.3%+11.9%+8.7% -0.2%
3 months +34.7%-7.9%+1.1% +3.9%
6 months +35.7%+22.0%+9.9% +8.2%
Year to date +1,157.0%-17.9%-2.7% +12.9%
1 year +1,094.2%-20.8%-2.2% +12.3%
3 years +104.4%-6.3%+39.6% +87.4%
3 years, per year +26.9%-2.1%+11.8% +23.3%
5 years +128.5%+13.6%+28.6% +67.9%
5 years, per year +18.0%+2.6%+5.2% +10.9%
10 years ——+154.4% +261.1%
10 years, per year ——+9.8% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureBVCRYANWTWSPY
Volatility, 1Y 267.1%45.1%31.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 111.8%47.2%33.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.60-0.33-0.18 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 4.10-0.46-0.07 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -97.3%-61.3%-30.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -14.7%-27.4%-8.9% -1.2%
52-week high $16.79$58.38$350.75 $779.14
52-week low $0.73$29.39$242.12 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBVCRYANWTW
P/E now vs peer median 17.7xmedian 10.5x 53.6xmedian 10.5x 19.2xmedian 10.5x
P/S now vs peer median 121.3xmedian 1.4x 3.4xmedian 1.4x 2.9xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 7.6x 18.8xmedian 7.6x 12.9xmedian 7.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median 12.6xmedian 8.5x 22.0xmedian 8.5x 17.6xmedian 8.5x
P/B now vs peer median 4.3xmedian 1.5x 10.7xmedian 1.5x 3.8xmedian 1.5x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.53 -12.20median 0.53 1.05median 0.53

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBVCRYANWTW
Revenue – $3.22B $10.10B
Operating income – $477.27M $2.25B
Net income – $242.82M $1.58B
Free cash flow – $492.78M $1.69B
EPS (diluted) – $0.75 $16.65
Cash & equivalents $4.46M $140.12M $1.63B
Total debt – $3.63B $6.53B
Shares (diluted) 4.22M 131.33M 94.00M
Enterprise value $13.73M $10.71B $21.18B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBVCRYANWTW
P/E 17.7x 53.6x 19.2x
P/FCF 12.6x 22.0x 17.6x
P/Operating cash flow – 19.4x 15.4x
P/S 121.3x 3.4x 2.9x
P/B 4.3x 10.7x 3.8x
P/Tangible book 4.4x 12.2x 4.7x
EV/EBITDA – 18.8x 12.9x
EV/EBIT – 30.0x 15.4x
EV/Revenue – 4.5x 3.4x
EV/FCF – 29.1x 20.5x
EV/Operating cash flow – 25.6x 18.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -12.20 1.05

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBVCRYANWTW
Revenue growth (1Y) – 14.4% 3.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 19.4% 3.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – -1.0% 140.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 12.7% 20.3%
Net income growth (1Y) – 26.8% 972.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 7.5% 13.2%
EPS growth (1Y) – 271.3% 1,115%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -4.4% 18.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -2.2% 36.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 21.0% 25.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -3.3% 43.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 18.7% 26.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBVCRYANWTW
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – 23.7% 26.4%
Operating margin – 14.8% 22.2%
Pretax margin – 8.8% 19.8%
Net margin – 3.1% 15.5%
FCF margin – 15.3% 16.7%
Operating cash flow margin – 17.4% 19.0%
Return on equity – 21.7% 19.9%
Return on assets – 2.1% 5.2%
Return on invested capital – 8.7% 12.5%
Return on capital employed – 9.9% 15.1%
Asset turnover – 0.3x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 2.3x 1.2x
Stock comp / revenue – 2.1% 1.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBVCRYANWTW
Debt / assets – 30.4% 21.4%
Debt / equity – 3.6x 0.8x
Net debt / EBITDA – 4.6x 1.8x
Debt / FCF – 7.4x 3.9x
Liabilities / assets 2.0% 91.5% 74.6%
Equity / assets 98.0% 8.5% 25.4%
Interest coverage – – 7.9x
Current ratio 44.8x 1.0x 1.1x
Quick ratio 44.1x 0.1x 0.3x
Cash ratio 44.1x 0.0x 0.1x
Altman Z-score – 1.01 1.38

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBVCRYANWTW
Dividend yield – 1.2% 1.2%
Net buyback yield – 2.8% 5.7%
Shareholder yield 0.0% 4.0% 6.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 27.0% 22.7%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 13.3% 21.1%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 13.6% 0.0%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 65.1% 0.0%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBVCRYANWTW
Forward P/E – 18.3xFY2026 15.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $2.31FY2026 $20.42FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +17.9%FY2026 +19.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +10.8% +8.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $328.34MFY2024 $3.10BFY2026 $10.10BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +13.9%FY2024 +1.6%FY2026 +4.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +18.0% +10.4% +16.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBVCRYANWTW
Held by institutions – 45.6% 97.1%
Institutions holding – 369 692
Change in shares held, QoQ – +5.0% +0.8%
Institutions buying – 198 314
Institutions selling – 134 280
Buyers to sellers – 1.48 1.12

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BVCRYANWTW
BVC 1.00 0.10 0.08
RYAN 0.10 1.00 0.50
WTW 0.08 0.50 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BVC, RYAN and WTW?

Willis Towers Watson (WTW) is the largest by market capitalisation: BitVentures (BVC) $60.43M, Ryan Specialty Holdings (RYAN) $10.83B, Willis Towers Watson (WTW) $29.69B.

Which stock is cheaper, BVC, RYAN and WTW?

BitVentures (BVC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (BitVentures (BVC) 17.7x, Ryan Specialty Holdings (RYAN) 53.6x, Willis Towers Watson (WTW) 19.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Willis Towers Watson (WTW) is cheapest (Ryan Specialty Holdings (RYAN) 18.3x, Willis Towers Watson (WTW) 15.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Ryan Specialty Holdings (RYAN) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ryan Specialty Holdings (RYAN) +14.4%, Willis Towers Watson (WTW) +3.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Willis Towers Watson (WTW) has the highest net margin (Ryan Specialty Holdings (RYAN) 3.1%, Willis Towers Watson (WTW) 15.5%). On return on invested capital, Willis Towers Watson (WTW) leads (Ryan Specialty Holdings (RYAN) 8.7%, Willis Towers Watson (WTW) 12.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year BitVentures (BVC) returned the most: BitVentures (BVC) +1,094.2%, Ryan Specialty Holdings (RYAN) -20.8%, Willis Towers Watson (WTW) -2.2%. Over five years, BitVentures (BVC) compounded fastest (BitVentures (BVC) +18.0%/yr, Ryan Specialty Holdings (RYAN) +2.6%/yr, Willis Towers Watson (WTW) +5.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Ryan Specialty Holdings (RYAN) has the highest dividend yield: BitVentures (BVC) 0.00%, Ryan Specialty Holdings (RYAN) 1.20%, Willis Towers Watson (WTW) 1.19%. BitVentures (BVC) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Willis Towers Watson (WTW) has been the steadiest (BitVentures (BVC) 267.1%, Ryan Specialty Holdings (RYAN) 45.1%, Willis Towers Watson (WTW) 31.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BVC, RYAN and WTW?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Willis Towers Watson (WTW) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.