BVC vs NP vs MRSH Stock Comparison

BitVentures, Neptune Insurance Holdings and Marsh & Mclennan Companies Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BVC BitVentures Ltd
$13.75 +21.1% 1M +1,036.4% 1Y
Market cap
$61.06M
P/E
17.0x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Insurance Brokers Financial Services
3 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Neptune Insurance Holdings leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Neptune Insurance Holdings 4, Marsh & Mclennan Companies 3, BitVentures 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBVCNPMRSHLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $61.06M $4.04B $90.99B MRSH
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 17.0x 90.5x 22.5x BVC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 48.9x 19.1x MRSH
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +33.8% +7.6% NP
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 22.7% 14.2% NP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 512.4% 13.1% NP
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 2.7x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.02% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +1,036.4% +7.6% +4.4% BVC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +16.9%/yr — +3.0%/yr BVC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 267.7% 60.7% 25.9% MRSH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 39/100 35/100 NP

Percentile Scorecard

BVCNPMRSH

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBVCNPMRSH
Valuation 9 #108 of 119 3 #115 of 119 10 #107 of 119
Growth – 78 #26 of 115 15 #98 of 115
Profitability – 99 #2 of 113 71 #33 of 113
Financial Health 100 #1 of 114 10 #103 of 114 21 #90 of 114
Shareholder Returns – 4 #103 of 107 57 #47 of 107
Overall – 39 35
  • BVC ranked among 126 companies in Insurance
  • NP ranked among 126 companies in Insurance
  • MRSH ranked among 126 companies in Insurance

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBVCNPMRSHSPY
1 month +21.1%+3.1%+13.8% -0.8%
3 months +25.0%-8.0%+6.3% +3.5%
6 months +25.1%+7.1%+14.5% +7.0%
Year to date +1,106.1%-2.7%+5.0% +12.2%
1 year +1,036.4%+7.6%+4.4% +13.0%
3 years +96.1%—+5.3% +86.3%
3 years, per year +25.2%—+1.8% +23.1%
5 years +118.6%—+16.2% +68.6%
5 years, per year +16.9%—+3.0% +11.0%
10 years ——+208.1% +258.0%
10 years, per year ——+11.9% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureBVCNPMRSHSPY
Volatility, 1Y 267.7%60.7%25.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 111.8%56.0%24.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.600.11-0.38 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 3.870.130.17 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -97.3%-43.8%-35.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -18.1%-19.0%-2.3% -1.8%
52-week high $16.79$35.05$199.34 $779.14
52-week low $0.73$17.14$157.32 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBVCNPMRSH
P/E now vs peer median 17.0xmedian 10.6x 87.1xmedian 10.6x 22.9xmedian 10.6x
P/S now vs peer median 116.4xmedian 1.4x 19.8xmedian 1.4x 3.3xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 7.6x —median 7.6x 15.9xmedian 7.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median 12.1xmedian 8.6x 47.5xmedian 8.6x 22.3xmedian 8.6x
P/B now vs peer median 4.2xmedian 1.5x -18.4xmedian 1.5x 6.2xmedian 1.5x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.52 —median 0.52 3.43median 0.52

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBVCNPMRSH
Revenue – $197.00M $28.46B
Operating income – $81.30M $6.09B
Net income – $44.74M $4.12B
Free cash flow – $82.04M $4.15B
EPS (diluted) – $0.31 $8.44
Cash & equivalents $4.46M $17.43M $1.84B
Total debt – $922.00M $20.53B
Shares (diluted) 4.22M 146.39M 479.00M
Enterprise value $14.37M $3.99B $83.15B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBVCNPMRSH
P/E 17.0x 87.1x 22.9x
P/FCF 12.1x 47.5x 22.3x
P/Operating cash flow – 47.5x 20.7x
P/S 116.4x 19.8x 3.3x
P/B 4.2x -18.4x 6.2x
P/Tangible book 4.2x -18.4x 8.9x
EV/EBITDA – – 15.9x
EV/EBIT – 50.4x 18.3x
EV/Revenue – 20.8x 3.9x
EV/FCF – 49.9x 26.8x
EV/Operating cash flow – 49.9x 24.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – 3.43

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBVCNPMRSH
Revenue growth (1Y) – 33.8% 7.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – 8.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – 7.0% -1.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – 7.8%
Net income growth (1Y) – 0.1% -1.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – – 5.5%
EPS growth (1Y) – 197.9% 1.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – 6.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 53.1% -12.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 4.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 53.1% -13.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 5.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBVCNPMRSH
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – – 24.6%
Operating margin – 41.3% 21.4%
Pretax margin – 34.1% 18.9%
Net margin – 22.7% 14.2%
FCF margin – 41.6% 14.6%
Operating cash flow margin – 41.6% 15.7%
Return on equity – – 27.2%
Return on assets – 43.4% 6.9%
Return on invested capital – 512.4% 13.1%
Return on capital employed – 3,191% 16.2%
Asset turnover – 1.9x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.8x 1.1x
Stock comp / revenue – 16.2% 1.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBVCNPMRSH
Debt / assets – 206.9% 34.3%
Debt / equity – -1.0x 1.4x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 2.7x
Debt / FCF – 2.6x 4.9x
Liabilities / assets 2.0% 303.6% 75.1%
Equity / assets 98.0% -203.6% 24.9%
Interest coverage – 5.4x 6.3x
Current ratio 44.8x 0.9x 1.1x
Quick ratio 44.1x 0.3x 0.5x
Cash ratio 44.1x 0.2x 0.1x
Altman Z-score – 5.39 2.77

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBVCNPMRSH
Dividend yield – – 1.9%
Net buyback yield – 0.0% 3.1%
Shareholder yield 0.0% 0.0% 5.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 43.6%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 43.3%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 8.4%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 13.1%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBVCNPMRSH
Forward P/E – 48.9xFY2026 19.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $0.58FY2026 $10.21FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +41.5%FY2026 +4.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +25.9% +15.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $328.34MFY2024 $195.39MFY2026 $30.28BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +13.9%FY2024 +22.5%FY2026 +12.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +18.0% +18.6% +6.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBVCNPMRSH
Held by institutions – 48.8% 93.9%
Institutions holding – 136 1,496
Change in shares held, QoQ – +3.3% +2.8%
Institutions buying – 105 624
Institutions selling – 24 652
Buyers to sellers – 4.38 0.96

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BVCNPMRSH
BVC 1.00 0.10 0.11
NP 0.10 1.00 0.28
MRSH 0.11 0.28 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BVC, NP and MRSH?

Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) is the largest by market capitalisation: BitVentures (BVC) $61.06M, Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) $4.04B, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) $90.99B.

Which stock is cheaper, BVC, NP and MRSH?

BitVentures (BVC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (BitVentures (BVC) 17.0x, Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) 90.5x, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) 22.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) is cheapest (Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) 48.9x, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) 19.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) +33.8%, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) +7.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) has the highest net margin (Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) 22.7%, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) 14.2%). On return on invested capital, Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) leads (Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) 512.4%, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) 13.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year BitVentures (BVC) returned the most: BitVentures (BVC) +1,036.4%, Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) +7.6%, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) +4.4%. Over five years, BitVentures (BVC) compounded fastest (BitVentures (BVC) +16.9%/yr, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) +3.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: BitVentures (BVC) 0.00%, Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) 0.00%, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) 0.02%. BitVentures (BVC) and Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) has been the steadiest (BitVentures (BVC) 267.7%, Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) 60.7%, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) 25.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BVC, NP and MRSH?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.