BUUU vs BAH vs IT Stock Comparison

Buuu, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding and Gartner Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BUUU BUUU Group Ltd
$6.37 -85.6% 1M -21.4% 1Y
Market cap
$97.50M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Consulting Industrials
IT Gartner Inc
$231.21 +23.1% 1M -7.6% 1Y
Market cap
$14.67B
P/E
18.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$6.46B
Div. yield
–
Consulting Industrials
7 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Gartner leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Gartner 7, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBUUUBAHITLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $97.50M $9.94B $14.67B IT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — 12.7x 18.9x BAH
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 12.4x 15.2x BAH
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — -6.2% +0.7% IT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 7.1% 12.0% IT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 17.1% 28.6% IT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 3.4x 1.1x IT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -21.4% -8.8% -7.6% IT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +0.9%/yr -6.3%/yr BAH
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 248.5% 42.2% 57.5% BAH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 64/100 65/100 IT

Percentile Scorecard

BUUUBAHIT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBUUUBAHIT
Valuation – 76 #28 of 112 60 #45 of 112
Growth – 62 #37 of 96 30 #68 of 96
Profitability – 84 #15 of 91 93 #7 of 91
Financial Health 94 #8 of 125 29 #89 of 125 44 #71 of 125
Shareholder Returns – 71 #20 of 67 99 #2 of 67
Overall – 64 65
  • BUUU ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • BAH ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • IT ranked among 130 companies in Business Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBUUUBAHITSPY
1 month -85.6%+14.3%+23.1% -0.8%
3 months -72.3%+16.4%+56.7% +3.5%
6 months -57.8%+9.4%+55.4% +7.0%
Year to date -0.8%-1.2%-8.4% +12.2%
1 year -21.4%-8.8%-7.6% +13.0%
3 years —-29.0%-29.0% +86.3%
3 years, per year —-10.8%-10.8% +23.1%
5 years —+4.6%-27.9% +68.6%
5 years, per year —+0.9%-6.3% +11.0%
10 years —+169.0%+170.3% +258.0%
10 years, per year —+10.4%+10.5% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureBUUUBAHITSPY
Volatility, 1Y 248.5%42.2%57.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 341.5%42.0%58.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.090.200.35 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.09-0.21-0.13 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -88.2%-67.9%-77.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -88.2%-18.5%-9.5% -1.8%
52-week high $53.90$102.23$255.58 $779.14
52-week low $6.37$59.71$125.73 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBUUUBAHIT
P/E now vs peer median —median 21.9x 12.7xmedian 21.9x 19.8xmedian 21.9x
P/S now vs peer median —median 0.9x 0.9xmedian 0.9x 2.3xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 12.2x 11.7xmedian 12.2x 12.3xmedian 12.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 14.3x 10.1xmedian 14.3x 11.3xmedian 14.3x
P/B now vs peer median 15.5xmedian 2.3x 8.0xmedian 2.3x -87.2xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.02 0.30median 1.02 103.21median 1.02

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBUUUBAHIT
Revenue – $10.98B $6.46B
Gross profit – $5.77B $4.50B
Operating income – $1.02B $1.12B
Net income – $784.00M $775.35M
Free cash flow – $984.00M $1.29B
EPS (diluted) – $6.56 $11.65
Cash & equivalents $5.72M $334.00M $1.49B
Total debt – $4.41B $2.98B
Shares (diluted) – 119.59M 66.58M
Enterprise value $97.50M $7.46B $8.36B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBUUUBAHIT
P/E – 12.7x 19.8x
P/FCF – 10.1x 11.3x
P/Operating cash flow – 9.2x 10.6x
P/S – 0.9x 2.3x
P/B 15.5x 8.0x -87.2x
P/Tangible book 15.5x 25.5x -31.6x
EV/EBITDA – 11.7x 12.3x
EV/EBIT – 13.8x 14.4x
EV/Revenue – 1.3x 2.5x
EV/FCF – 14.2x 12.5x
EV/Operating cash flow – 13.0x 11.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.30 103.21

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBUUUBAHIT
Revenue growth (1Y) – -6.2% 0.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 3.1% 4.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – -7.8% 3.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 2.4% 4.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) – -8.0% -4.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 25.3% -4.4%
Net income growth (1Y) – -5.1% -38.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 38.5% -5.7%
EPS growth (1Y) – -2.5% -28.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 42.9% 0.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 18.2% -14.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 61.2% 7.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 20.1% -14.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 75.1% 8.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBUUUBAHIT
Gross margin – 52.5% 69.6%
EBITDA margin – 10.9% 20.3%
Operating margin – 9.3% 17.3%
Pretax margin – 7.9% 15.9%
Net margin – 7.1% 12.0%
FCF margin – 9.0% 19.9%
Operating cash flow margin – 9.8% 21.4%
Return on equity – 64.1% –
Return on assets – 9.9% 10.4%
Return on invested capital – 17.1% 28.6%
Return on capital employed – 17.1% 29.7%
Asset turnover – 1.4x 0.9x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.4x 1.8x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.7% 2.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBUUUBAHIT
Debt / assets 4.9% 53.1% 41.4%
Debt / equity 0.1x 3.5x -17.8x
Net debt / EBITDA – 3.4x 1.1x
Debt / FCF – 4.5x 2.3x
Liabilities / assets 21.9% 85.0% 102.3%
Equity / assets 78.1% 15.0% -2.3%
Interest coverage – – 7.8x
Current ratio 4.7x 1.4x 0.9x
Quick ratio 4.6x 2.2x 0.7x
Cash ratio 3.6x 0.2x 0.4x
Altman Z-score – 3.35 3.93

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBUUUBAHIT
Dividend yield – 2.8% –
Net buyback yield – 3.4% 17.9%
Shareholder yield – 6.2% 17.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBUUUBAHIT
Forward P/E – 12.4xFY2026 15.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $6.72FY2026 $15.20FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +3.2%FY2026 +15.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – -3.1% +11.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $11.71BFY2026 $6.72BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +4.4%FY2026 +3.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +3.9% +3.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBUUUBAHIT
Held by institutions – 96.5% 100.0%
Institutions holding – 557 650
Change in shares held, QoQ – +1.0% -0.6%
Institutions buying – 283 281
Institutions selling – 202 291
Buyers to sellers – 1.40 0.97

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BUUUBAHIT
BUUU 1.00 -0.14 -0.01
BAH -0.14 1.00 0.43
IT -0.01 0.43 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BUUU, BAH and IT?

Gartner (IT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Buuu (BUUU) $97.50M, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) $9.94B, Gartner (IT) $14.67B.

Which stock is cheaper, BUUU, BAH and IT?

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) 12.7x, Gartner (IT) 18.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) is cheapest (Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) 12.4x, Gartner (IT) 15.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Gartner (IT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) -6.2%, Gartner (IT) +0.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Gartner (IT) has the highest net margin (Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) 7.1%, Gartner (IT) 12.0%). On return on invested capital, Gartner (IT) leads (Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) 17.1%, Gartner (IT) 28.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Gartner (IT) returned the most: Buuu (BUUU) -21.4%, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) -8.8%, Gartner (IT) -7.6%. Over five years, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) compounded fastest (Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) +0.9%/yr, Gartner (IT) -6.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) has been the steadiest (Buuu (BUUU) 248.5%, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) 42.2%, Gartner (IT) 57.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BUUU, BAH and IT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Gartner (IT) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.