BTQ vs FCCN vs IONQ Stock Comparison

BTQ Technologies, Spectral Capital and IonQ Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (UIS) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
BTQ BTQ Technologies Corp.
$1.67 -48.8% 1M -77.1% 1Y
Market cap
$252.92M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Quantum Computing Technology
FCCN SPECTRAL CAPITAL Corp
$1.64 -34.4% 1M -23.7% 1Y
Market cap
$139.00M
P/E
2,958x
Revenue (TTM)
$668.63M
Div. yield
–
AI Platforms Technology
2 wins
IONQ IonQ, Inc.
$26.48 -38.9% 1M -52.2% 1Y
Market cap
$12.48B
P/E
63.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$380.44M
Div. yield
–
Quantum Computing Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

6 decided of 12

IonQ leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (IonQ 4, Spectral Capital 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBTQFCCNIONQLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $252.92M $139.00M $12.48B IONQ
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -7.3x 2,958x 63.9x IONQ
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — — +376.5% –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 0.0% 51.3% IONQ
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 0.9x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -77.1% -23.7% -52.2% FCCN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — — +6.6%/yr –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 118.5% 116.3% 90.5% IONQ
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 17/100 40/100 39/100 FCCN

Percentile Scorecard

BTQFCCNIONQ

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBTQFCCNIONQ
Valuation 7 #115 of 124 56 #55 of 124 29 #88 of 124
Growth 3 #111 of 114 42 #67 of 114 51 #56 of 114
Profitability 2 #109 of 111 60 #45 of 111 31 #77 of 111
Financial Health 52 #62 of 128 16 #108 of 128 79 #28 of 128
Shareholder Returns 21 #59 of 74 26 #55 of 74 7 #69 of 74
Overall 17 40 39
  • BTQ ranked among 136 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • FCCN ranked among 136 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • IONQ ranked among 136 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBTQFCCNIONQSPY
1 month -48.8%-34.4%-38.9% -5.9%
3 months -58.3%-67.7%-33.3% -4.6%
6 months -47.8%-17.6%-44.5% +0.2%
Year to date -67.4%-60.3%-41.0% +7.5%
1 year -77.1%-23.7%-52.2% +8.2%
3 years +420.1%—+136.2% +68.3%
3 years, per year +73.3%—+33.2% +19.0%
5 years ——+37.4% +56.5%
5 years, per year ——+6.6% +9.4%

Risk

MeasureBTQFCCNIONQSPY
Volatility, 1Y 118.5%116.3%90.5% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 102.7%111.6%83.8% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 4.03-0.013.36 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.65-0.20-0.58 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -88.2%-86.4%-90.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -77.3%-70.5%-63.3% -5.9%
52-week high $7.35$5.55$72.07 $779.14
52-week low $1.67$1.35$26.48 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBTQFCCNIONQ
P/E now vs peer median -6.5xmedian 39.4x 3,212xmedian 39.4x 52.7xmedian 39.4x
P/S now vs peer median —median 4.0x 0.2xmedian 4.0x 30.1xmedian 4.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 34.1x 287.2xmedian 34.1x -10.4xmedian 34.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median -15.9xmedian 22.7x -61.3xmedian 22.7x -16.6xmedian 22.7x
P/B now vs peer median 18.6xmedian 2.9x 2.7xmedian 2.9x 2.3xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.32 106.28median 1.32 1.32median 1.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBTQFCCNIONQ
Revenue – $668.63M $380.44M
Gross profit – $8.35M $91.68M
Operating income -$34.64M -$6.62M -$1.27B
Net income -$34.57M -$21.19K $252.40M
Free cash flow -$14.76M -$2.57M -$688.54M
R&D $4.75M – $524.13M
EPS (diluted) $-0.26 $0.00 $0.49
Cash & equivalents $6.85M $5.27M $209.45M
Total debt – – $65.61M
Shares (diluted) 135.62M 94.89M 400.87M
Enterprise value $193.65M $128.51M $4.94B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBTQFCCNIONQ
P/E -6.5x 3,212x 52.7x
P/FCF -15.9x -61.3x -16.6x
P/Operating cash flow -15.8x -61.6x -17.8x
P/S – 0.2x 30.1x
P/B 18.6x 2.7x 2.3x
P/Tangible book 18.6x 8.1x 3.0x
EV/EBITDA – 287.2x -10.4x
EV/EBIT -6.6x -23.1x -8.3x
EV/Revenue – 0.2x 27.7x
EV/FCF -15.4x -59.3x -15.3x
EV/Operating cash flow -15.3x -59.6x -16.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 106.28 1.32

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBTQFCCNIONQ
Revenue growth (1Y) – – 376.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 1,948% 168.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 124.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 276.8% 87.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) -1,885% -83.7% -163.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -304.6% -115.5%
Net income growth (1Y) -307.6% 99.4% 117.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 40.4% 57.1%
EPS growth (1Y) -571.9% 100.9% 109.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 30.2% 39.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -28.6% -159.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -186.1% -112.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -29.2% -165.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -186.6% -109.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBTQFCCNIONQ
Gross margin – 1.2% 24.1%
EBITDA margin – 0.1% -266.3%
Operating margin – -1.0% -333.9%
Pretax margin – 0.0% 19.3%
Net margin – 0.0% 51.3%
FCF margin – -0.4% -181.0%
Operating cash flow margin – -0.4% -169.5%
Return on equity -234.8% 0.1% 6.0%
Return on assets -191.6% 0.0% 3.5%
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed -247.3% -4.7% -18.3%
Asset turnover – 2.2x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.4x 120.9x -2.6x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.1% 140.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBTQFCCNIONQ
Debt / assets – – 0.8%
Debt / equity – – 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 0.9x
Debt / FCF – – -0.1x
Liabilities / assets 26.9% 74.3% 36.0%
Equity / assets 73.1% 25.7% 64.0%
Interest coverage -775.2x – –
Current ratio 1.9x 0.8x 4.2x
Quick ratio 1.7x 0.8x 3.2x
Cash ratio 1.7x 0.0x 2.7x
Altman Z-score – 3.10 1.82

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBTQFCCNIONQ
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -3.2% -1.2% -17.5%
Shareholder yield -3.2% -1.2% -17.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBTQFCCNIONQ
EPS, next fiscal year – – $-1.36FY2026
Revenue, next fiscal year – – $458.49MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – – +252.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – – +71.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBTQFCCNIONQ
Held by institutions 28.2% – 53.3%
Institutions holding 94 – 783
Change in shares held, QoQ +103.2% – -2.4%
Institutions buying 55 – 538
Institutions selling 15 – 154
Buyers to sellers 3.67 – 3.49

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BTQFCCNIONQ
BTQ 1.00 -0.08 0.61
FCCN -0.08 1.00 0.04
IONQ 0.61 0.04 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BTQ, FCCN and IONQ?

IonQ (IONQ) is the largest by market capitalisation: BTQ Technologies (BTQ) $252.92M, Spectral Capital (FCCN) $139.00M, IonQ (IONQ) $12.48B.

Which stock is cheaper, BTQ, FCCN and IONQ?

IonQ (IONQ) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (BTQ Technologies (BTQ) -7.3x, Spectral Capital (FCCN) 2,958x, IonQ (IONQ) 63.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is more profitable?

IonQ (IONQ) has the highest net margin (Spectral Capital (FCCN) 0.0%, IonQ (IONQ) 51.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Spectral Capital (FCCN) returned the most: BTQ Technologies (BTQ) -77.1%, Spectral Capital (FCCN) -23.7%, IonQ (IONQ) -52.2%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, IonQ (IONQ) has been the steadiest (BTQ Technologies (BTQ) 118.5%, Spectral Capital (FCCN) 116.3%, IonQ (IONQ) 90.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BTQ, FCCN and IONQ?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, IonQ (IONQ) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.