BSBR vs ING vs UWMC Stock Comparison

Banco Santander (Brasil), Ing Groep and UWM Holdings Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ING Ing Groep Nv
$32.33 -11.5% 1M +34.9% 1Y
Market cap
$97.36B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Money Center Banks Financial Services
4 wins
UWMC UWM Holdings Corp
$1.40 +13.8% 1M -76.1% 1Y
Market cap
$524.85M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.58B
Div. yield
–
Mortgage Lending Financial Services

Head to Head

5 decided of 12

Ing Groep leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Ing Groep 4, Banco Santander (Brasil) 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBSBRINGUWMCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $18.45B $97.36B $524.85M ING
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — — -14.1x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 7.1x 12.1x 7.4x BSBR
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — — +26.1% –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — — -1.0% –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 6.3% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 10.6x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -11.2% +34.9% -76.1% ING
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -5.1%/yr +16.4%/yr -27.4%/yr ING
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 38.0% 27.8% 79.6% ING
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — — 37/100 –

Percentile Scorecard

BSBRINGUWMC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBSBRINGUWMC
Valuation – – 21 #135 of 170
Growth – – 16 #135 of 160
Profitability – – 32 #102 of 149
Financial Health 25 #152 of 203 22 #159 of 203 18 #130 of 158
Shareholder Returns 99 #3 of 342 93 #24 of 342 97 #5 of 135
Overall – – 37
  • BSBR ranked among 370 companies in Banking
  • ING ranked among 370 companies in Banking
  • UWMC ranked among 175 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBSBRINGUWMCSPY
1 month -16.0%-11.5%+13.8% -0.8%
3 months -11.6%-3.5%-24.3% +3.5%
6 months -18.9%+15.2%-62.6% +7.0%
Year to date -21.1%+15.5%-68.0% +12.2%
1 year -11.2%+34.9%-76.1% +13.0%
3 years -10.7%+156.0%-71.9% +86.3%
3 years, per year -3.7%+36.8%-34.6% +23.1%
5 years -23.1%+113.3%-79.7% +68.6%
5 years, per year -5.1%+16.4%-27.4% +11.0%
10 years -39.3%+148.9%— +258.0%
10 years, per year -4.9%+9.5%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureBSBRINGUWMCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 38.0%27.8%79.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 39.3%26.7%89.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.231.351.44 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.301.25-0.96 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -52.2%-47.4%-89.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -33.1%-13.2%-77.0% -1.8%
52-week high $7.20$37.26$6.10 $779.14
52-week low $4.82$24.17$1.00 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBSBRINGUWMC
P/E now vs peer median —median 12.1x —median 12.1x -12.7xmedian 11.0x
P/S now vs peer median —median 3.4x —median 3.4x 0.6xmedian 2.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 5.0x —median 5.0x 14.9xmedian 13.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 11.0x —median 11.0x -0.5xmedian 6.9x
P/B now vs peer median 1.5xmedian 1.2x 1.5xmedian 1.2x 2.3xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.36 —median 1.36 0.25median 0.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBSBRINGUWMC
Revenue – – $3.58B
Net income – – -$104.96M
Free cash flow – – -$4.92B
EPS (diluted) – – $-0.11
Cash & equivalents $5.42B $74.19B $498.41M
Total debt $55.96B $21.78B $19.23B
Shares (diluted) 3.93B 2.99B 337.53M
Enterprise value -$329.58B -$446.09B -$1.77B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBSBRINGUWMC
P/E – – -12.7x
P/FCF – – -0.5x
P/Operating cash flow – – -0.5x
P/S – – 0.6x
P/B 1.5x 1.5x 2.3x
P/Tangible book 2.0x 1.6x -0.5x
EV/EBITDA – – 14.9x
EV/EBIT – – 16.8x
EV/Revenue – – 2.2x
EV/FCF – – -1.6x
EV/Operating cash flow – – -1.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – 0.25

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBSBRINGUWMC
Revenue growth (1Y) – – 26.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – 27.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) – – -175.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – – -31.9%
EPS growth (1Y) – – -287.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – -51.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – -103.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -18.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – -100.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -18.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBSBRINGUWMC
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – – 14.6%
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin – – -3.2%
Net margin – – -1.0%
FCF margin – – -137.6%
Operating cash flow margin – – -135.9%
Return on equity – – -8.1%
Return on assets – – -0.6%
Return on invested capital – – 6.3%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover – – 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – 46.3x
Stock comp / revenue – – 1.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBSBRINGUWMC
Debt / assets 6.3% 1.6% 33.5%
Debt / equity 0.6x 0.4x 6.1x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 10.6x
Debt / FCF – – -1.2x
Liabilities / assets 90.1% 95.3% 94.5%
Equity / assets 9.9% 4.7% 5.5%
Interest coverage – – 0.8x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBSBRINGUWMC
Dividend yield 8.7% 4.7% 21.4%
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 8.7% 4.7% 21.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBSBRINGUWMC
Forward P/E 7.1xFY2026 12.1xFY2026 7.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.68FY2026 $2.68FY2026 $0.19FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -18.1%FY2026 +5.9%FY2026 +58.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +30.9% +18.3% +26.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $16.93BFY2026 $27.20BFY2026 $2.26BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +6.4%FY2026 -1.0%FY2026 -5.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +9.6% +3.2% +37.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBSBRINGUWMC
Held by institutions 14.6% 4.5% 79.7%
Institutions holding 88 589 290
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.3% -19.0% +31.8%
Institutions buying 52 319 213
Institutions selling 24 154 50
Buyers to sellers 2.17 2.07 4.26

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BSBRINGUWMC
BSBR 1.00 0.48 0.13
ING 0.48 1.00 0.12
UWMC 0.13 0.12 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BSBR, ING and UWMC?

Ing Groep (ING) is the largest by market capitalisation: Banco Santander (Brasil) (BSBR) $18.45B, Ing Groep (ING) $97.36B, UWM Holdings (UWMC) $524.85M.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ing Groep (ING) returned the most: Banco Santander (Brasil) (BSBR) -11.2%, Ing Groep (ING) +34.9%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -76.1%. Over five years, Ing Groep (ING) compounded fastest (Banco Santander (Brasil) (BSBR) -5.1%/yr, Ing Groep (ING) +16.4%/yr, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -27.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ing Groep (ING) has been the steadiest (Banco Santander (Brasil) (BSBR) 38.0%, Ing Groep (ING) 27.8%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 79.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BSBR, ING and UWMC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ing Groep (ING) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.