BSBR vs FNMA vs UWMC Stock Comparison

Banco Santander (Brasil), Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae and UWM Holdings Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
UWMC UWM Holdings Corp
$1.55 +26.0% 1M -73.5% 1Y
Market cap
$2.49B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.58B
Div. yield
19.35%
Mortgage Lending Financial Services
3 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae 4, Banco Santander (Brasil) 3, UWM Holdings 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBSBRFNMAUWMCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $36.16B $24.58B $2.49B BSBR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — 108.3x -14.1x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 7.1x 1.5x 8.2x FNMA
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — -3.1% +26.1% UWMC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 0.8% -1.0% FNMA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 2.8% 6.3% UWMC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 10.6x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 8.68% 0.00% 19.35% UWMC
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -12.5% -63.7% -73.5% BSBR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -4.9%/yr +36.7%/yr -25.6%/yr FNMA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 37.9% 85.6% 80.1% BSBR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 54/100 36/100 FNMA

Percentile Scorecard

BSBRFNMAUWMC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBSBRFNMAUWMC
Valuation – 55 #77 of 169 20 #136 of 169
Growth – 86 #23 of 160 16 #135 of 160
Profitability – 69 #47 of 149 32 #102 of 149
Financial Health 26 #130 of 175 6 #149 of 158 18 #130 of 158
Shareholder Returns 99 #3 of 341 – 95 #8 of 136
Overall – 54 36
  • BSBR ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • FNMA ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit
  • UWMC ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBSBRFNMAUWMCSPY
1 month -15.7%-10.9%+26.0% -0.2%
3 months -12.0%-31.3%-17.1% +3.9%
6 months -18.0%-45.3%-57.5% +8.2%
Year to date -20.8%-61.0%-64.6% +12.9%
1 year -12.5%-63.7%-73.5% +12.3%
3 years -10.4%+474.0%-68.9% +87.4%
3 years, per year -3.6%+79.1%-32.3% +23.3%
5 years -22.3%+376.1%-77.1% +67.9%
5 years, per year -4.9%+36.7%-25.6% +10.9%
10 years -39.0%+147.9%— +261.1%
10 years, per year -4.8%+9.5%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureBSBRFNMAUWMCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 37.9%85.6%80.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 39.3%74.1%89.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.231.301.48 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.33-0.74-0.92 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -52.2%-78.7%-89.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -32.8%-64.9%-74.6% -1.2%
52-week high $7.20$11.95$6.10 $779.14
52-week low $4.82$3.26$1.00 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBSBRFNMAUWMC
P/E now vs peer median —median 12.1x 108.3xmedian 11.1x -14.1xmedian 11.1x
P/S now vs peer median —median 3.4x 0.8xmedian 2.6x 0.7xmedian 2.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 5.0x —median 13.5x 15.3xmedian 13.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 10.9x 0.6xmedian 7.0x -0.5xmedian 7.0x
P/B now vs peer median 1.5xmedian 1.2x 0.2xmedian 0.7x 2.5xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.34 0.54median 0.32 0.28median 0.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBSBRFNMAUWMC
Revenue – $29.17B $3.58B
Net income – $15.09B -$104.96M
Free cash flow – $41.31B -$4.92B
EPS (diluted) – $0.04 $-0.11
Cash & equivalents $5.42B – $498.41M
Total debt $55.96B $4.19T $19.23B
Shares (diluted) 3.93B 5.89B 337.53M
Enterprise value -$311.52B $24.58B $1.04B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBSBRFNMAUWMC
P/E – 108.3x -14.1x
P/FCF – 0.6x -0.5x
P/Operating cash flow – 0.6x -0.5x
P/S – 0.8x 0.7x
P/B 1.5x 0.2x 2.5x
P/Tangible book 2.0x 0.2x -0.6x
EV/EBITDA – – 15.3x
EV/EBIT – 27.9x 17.3x
EV/Revenue – 144.4x 2.2x
EV/FCF – 102.0x -1.6x
EV/Operating cash flow – 102.0x -1.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.54 0.28

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBSBRFNMAUWMC
Revenue growth (1Y) – -3.1% 26.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 0.2% 27.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) – -0.4% -175.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 6.1% -31.9%
EPS growth (1Y) – 22,700% -287.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 200.4% -51.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 485.1% -103.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 16.8% -18.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 485.1% -100.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 16.8% -18.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBSBRFNMAUWMC
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – – 14.6%
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin – 64.8% -3.2%
Net margin – 0.8% -1.0%
FCF margin – 141.6% -137.6%
Operating cash flow margin – 141.6% -135.9%
Return on equity – 13.2% -8.1%
Return on assets – 0.3% -0.6%
Return on invested capital – 2.8% 6.3%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover – 0.0x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 2.7x 46.3x
Stock comp / revenue – – 1.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBSBRFNMAUWMC
Debt / assets 6.3% 96.7% 33.5%
Debt / equity 0.6x 36.0x 6.1x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 10.6x
Debt / FCF – 101.4x -1.2x
Liabilities / assets 90.1% 97.3% 94.5%
Equity / assets 9.9% 2.7% 5.5%
Interest coverage – 1.1x 0.8x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBSBRFNMAUWMC
Dividend yield 8.7% – 19.4%
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 8.7% 0.0% 19.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBSBRFNMAUWMC
Forward P/E 7.1xFY2026 1.5xFY2026 8.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.68FY2026 $2.78FY2026 $0.19FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -18.1%FY2026 +13.9%FY2026 +58.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +30.9% -7.9% +26.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $16.93BFY2026 $31.10BFY2026 $2.26BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +6.4%FY2026 +7.4%FY2026 -5.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +9.6% -7.3% +37.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBSBRFNMAUWMC
Held by institutions 14.6% 0.0% 17.0%
Institutions holding 88 25 290
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.3% +58.6% +31.8%
Institutions buying 52 13 213
Institutions selling 24 2 50
Buyers to sellers 2.17 6.50 4.26

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BSBRFNMAUWMC
BSBR 1.00 0.08 0.13
FNMA 0.08 1.00 0.04
UWMC 0.13 0.04 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BSBR, FNMA and UWMC?

Banco Santander (Brasil) (BSBR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Banco Santander (Brasil) (BSBR) $36.16B, Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) $24.58B, UWM Holdings (UWMC) $2.49B.

Which company is growing faster?

UWM Holdings (UWMC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) -3.1%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) +26.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) has the highest net margin (Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) 0.8%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -1.0%). On return on invested capital, UWM Holdings (UWMC) leads (Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) 2.8%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 6.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Banco Santander (Brasil) (BSBR) returned the most: Banco Santander (Brasil) (BSBR) -12.5%, Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) -63.7%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -73.5%. Over five years, Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) compounded fastest (Banco Santander (Brasil) (BSBR) -4.9%/yr, Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) +36.7%/yr, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -25.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

UWM Holdings (UWMC) has the highest dividend yield: Banco Santander (Brasil) (BSBR) 8.68%, Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) 0.00%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 19.35%. Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Banco Santander (Brasil) (BSBR) has been the steadiest (Banco Santander (Brasil) (BSBR) 37.9%, Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) 85.6%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 80.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BSBR, FNMA and UWMC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.