BSAI vs SIFY vs WULF Stock Comparison

Blusky Ai, Sify Technologies and Terawulf Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BSAI Blusky Ai Inc.
$11.11 +30.2% 1M +133.9% 1Y
Market cap
$278.63M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Data Centers Technology
2 wins
SIFY Sify Technologies Ltd
$11.58 -13.3% 1M -6.1% 1Y
Market cap
$893.17M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$384.50M
Div. yield
–
Data Centers Technology
6 wins
WULF Terawulf Inc.
$11.98 -23.9% 1M -12.6% 1Y
Market cap
$6.16B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$165.19M
Div. yield
–
Data Centers Technology
1 win

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Sify Technologies leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Sify Technologies 6, Blusky Ai 2, Terawulf 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBSAISIFYWULFLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $278.63M $893.17M $6.16B WULF
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -20.3x -57.8x -3.2x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 579.0x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +5.7% +4.1% SIFY
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — -4.0% -1,179.9% SIFY
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 5.4% -9.2% SIFY
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -9.4x -8.4x SIFY
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +133.9% -6.1% -12.6% BSAI
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -3.8%/yr -10.7%/yr -15.5%/yr BSAI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 900.1% 60.8% 92.8% SIFY
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 52/100 11/100 SIFY

Percentile Scorecard

BSAISIFYWULF

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBSAISIFYWULF
Valuation – 65 #14 of 38 3 #37 of 38
Growth 3 #35 of 36 31 #25 of 36 6 #34 of 36
Profitability – 61 #14 of 34 6 #32 of 34
Financial Health 16 #32 of 38 – 27 #28 of 38
Shareholder Returns – – 15 #18 of 21
Overall – 52 11
  • BSAI ranked among 39 companies in Cloud Computing
  • SIFY ranked among 39 companies in Cloud Computing
  • WULF ranked among 39 companies in Cloud Computing

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBSAISIFYWULFSPY
1 month +30.2%-13.3%-23.9% -0.8%
3 months +58.7%-20.2%-33.4% +3.5%
6 months +159.6%-22.1%-44.1% +7.0%
Year to date +105.7%-5.0%+4.3% +12.2%
1 year +133.9%-6.1%-12.6% +13.0%
3 years +1,288.8%+33.1%+969.6% +86.3%
3 years, per year +140.5%+10.0%+120.5% +23.1%
5 years -17.7%-43.2%-56.8% +68.6%
5 years, per year -3.8%-10.7%-15.5% +11.0%
10 years -97.9%+82.1%+10.9% +258.0%
10 years, per year -31.9%+6.2%+1.0% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureBSAISIFYWULFSPY
Volatility, 1Y 900.1%60.8%92.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 1,049.3%62.0%90.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 8.472.123.72 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.15-0.10-0.14 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -99.9%-91.8%-98.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -41.6%-32.8%-58.7% -1.8%
52-week high $19.01$17.24$28.98 $779.14
52-week low $0.01$10.37$10.99 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBSAISIFYWULF
P/E now vs peer median -20.3xmedian 29.6x -54.3xmedian 29.6x -3.0xmedian 29.6x
P/S now vs peer median —median 4.2x 2.2xmedian 4.2x 36.2xmedian 4.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 24.2x -22.4xmedian 24.2x -27.7xmedian 24.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 15.1x —median 15.1x -2.2xmedian 15.1x
P/B now vs peer median -172.0xmedian 3.9x 4.2xmedian 3.9x 40.5xmedian 3.9x
PEG now vs peer median 0.05median 0.38 1.09median 0.38 0.03median 0.38

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBSAISIFYWULF
Revenue – $384.50M $165.19M
Gross profit – $206.52M $114.42M
Operating income -$3.00M $39.31M -$413.59M
Net income -$5.17M -$15.57M -$1.95B
Free cash flow – – -$2.74B
EPS (diluted) $-0.55 $-0.21 $-4.01
Cash & equivalents $507.55K – $2.62B
Total debt $3.10M $599.45M $5.21B
Shares (diluted) 25.03M 72.46M 485.73M
Enterprise value $275.87M $893.17M -$3.07B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBSAISIFYWULF
P/E -20.3x -54.3x -3.0x
P/FCF – – -2.2x
P/Operating cash flow – – -21.4x
P/S – 2.2x 36.2x
P/B -172.0x 4.2x 40.5x
P/Tangible book -172.0x 4.2x 40.6x
EV/EBITDA – -22.4x -27.7x
EV/EBIT -92.7x 36.6x -20.7x
EV/Revenue – 3.7x 51.9x
EV/FCF – – -3.1x
EV/Operating cash flow – – -30.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.05 1.09 0.03

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBSAISIFYWULF
Revenue growth (1Y) – 5.7% 4.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -65.1% 59.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 12.2% 47.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 65.9% 79.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) -54.1% 49.9% -190.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -52.1% -10.7% -114.6%
Net income growth (1Y) -228.9% 19.3% -942.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -34.0% -73.4% -166.8%
EPS growth (1Y) -9.1% 31.2% -728.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -384.4% -49.8% -101.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – -350.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -141.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – -508.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -276.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBSAISIFYWULF
Gross margin – 53.7% 69.3%
EBITDA margin – -16.7% -187.4%
Operating margin – 10.2% -250.4%
Pretax margin – 3.1% -1,164%
Net margin – -4.0% -1,180%
FCF margin – – -1,656%
Operating cash flow margin – – -169.0%
Return on equity – -10.8% -5,567%
Return on assets -209.3% – -25.8%
Return on invested capital – 5.4% -9.2%
Return on capital employed – – -11.0%
Asset turnover – – 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – 0.1x
Stock comp / revenue – – 118.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBSAISIFYWULF
Debt / assets 8.1% – 64.8%
Debt / equity -0.1x 3.0x 35.3x
Net debt / EBITDA – -9.4x -8.4x
Debt / FCF – – -1.9x
Liabilities / assets 171.4% – 98.2%
Equity / assets -71.4% – 1.8%
Interest coverage -49.6x 2.0x -2.1x
Current ratio 0.1x – 0.7x
Quick ratio 0.1x – 0.7x
Cash ratio 0.1x – 0.7x
Altman Z-score – – -0.25

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBSAISIFYWULF
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – -20.3%
Shareholder yield – 0.0% -20.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBSAISIFYWULF
Forward P/E – 579.0xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year – $0.02FY2026 $-3.04FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +150.0% –
Revenue, next fiscal year – $765.58MFY2026 $247.09MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +8.7%FY2026 +46.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +30.6% +255.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBSAISIFYWULF
Held by institutions – 4.6% 79.4%
Institutions holding – 42 495
Change in shares held, QoQ – +2.8% +25.2%
Institutions buying – 27 307
Institutions selling – 4 137
Buyers to sellers – 6.75 2.24

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BSAISIFYWULF
BSAI 1.00 0.09 0.15
SIFY 0.09 1.00 0.31
WULF 0.15 0.31 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BSAI, SIFY and WULF?

Terawulf (WULF) is the largest by market capitalisation: Blusky Ai (BSAI) $278.63M, Sify Technologies (SIFY) $893.17M, Terawulf (WULF) $6.16B.

Which company is growing faster?

Sify Technologies (SIFY) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Sify Technologies (SIFY) +5.7%, Terawulf (WULF) +4.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Sify Technologies (SIFY) has the highest net margin (Sify Technologies (SIFY) -4.0%, Terawulf (WULF) -1,179.9%). On return on invested capital, Sify Technologies (SIFY) leads (Sify Technologies (SIFY) 5.4%, Terawulf (WULF) -9.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Blusky Ai (BSAI) returned the most: Blusky Ai (BSAI) +133.9%, Sify Technologies (SIFY) -6.1%, Terawulf (WULF) -12.6%. Over five years, Blusky Ai (BSAI) compounded fastest (Blusky Ai (BSAI) -3.8%/yr, Sify Technologies (SIFY) -10.7%/yr, Terawulf (WULF) -15.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Sify Technologies (SIFY) has been the steadiest (Blusky Ai (BSAI) 900.1%, Sify Technologies (SIFY) 60.8%, Terawulf (WULF) 92.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BSAI, SIFY and WULF?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Sify Technologies (SIFY) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.