BSAC vs MTB vs RF Stock Comparison

Banco Santander Chile, M&T Bank and Regions Financial Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (TFC) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
BSAC Banco Santander Chile
$31.82 -7.4% 1M +12.3% 1Y
Market cap
$14.99B
P/E
0.0x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
4.65%
Regional Banks Financial Services
4 wins
MTB M&T Bank Corp
$221.35 +0.1% 1M +21.0% 1Y
Market cap
$31.97B
P/E
11.2x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
2.71%
Regional Banks Financial Services
3 wins
RF Regions Financial Corp
$28.51 +3.2% 1M +17.6% 1Y
Market cap
$24.29B
P/E
11.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.62B
Div. yield
3.88%
Regional Banks Financial Services
2 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Banco Santander Chile leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Banco Santander Chile 4, M&T Bank 3, Regions Financial 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBSACMTBRFLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $14.99B $31.97B $24.29B MTB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 0.0x 11.2x 11.3x BSAC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 11.2x 10.8x 10.2x RF
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — — +4.4% –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — — 28.2% –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 14.6% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.0x — 1.6x BSAC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 4.65% 2.71% 3.88% BSAC
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +12.3% +21.0% +17.6% MTB
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +11.9%/yr +8.4%/yr +3.7%/yr BSAC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 28.9% 21.3% 23.3% MTB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 33/100 — 39/100 RF

Percentile Scorecard

BSACMTBRF

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBSACMTBRF
Valuation 11 #319 of 360 66 #123 of 360 24 #275 of 360
Growth 21 #152 of 191 – 10 #173 of 191
Profitability – – 49 #87 of 168
Financial Health 8 #161 of 175 – 49 #90 of 175
Shareholder Returns 93 #25 of 341 56 #151 of 341 64 #123 of 341
Overall 33 – 39
  • BSAC ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • MTB ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • RF ranked among 368 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBSACMTBRFSPY
1 month -7.4%+0.1%+3.2% -0.2%
3 months -6.2%-12.4%-8.8% +3.9%
6 months -3.8%+1.8%+0.6% +8.2%
Year to date +2.3%+9.9%+5.2% +12.9%
1 year +12.3%+21.0%+17.6% +12.3%
3 years +82.0%+103.2%+103.5% +87.4%
3 years, per year +22.1%+26.7%+26.7% +23.3%
5 years +75.4%+49.5%+20.1% +67.9%
5 years, per year +11.9%+8.4%+3.7% +10.9%
10 years +44.2%+81.5%+163.0% +261.1%
10 years, per year +3.7%+6.1%+10.2% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureBSACMTBRFSPY
Volatility, 1Y 28.9%21.3%23.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 30.5%21.5%25.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.090.560.66 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.430.990.75 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -40.5%-43.1%-44.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -15.1%-12.9%-12.0% -1.2%
52-week high $37.46$254.11$32.40 $779.14
52-week low $28.22$180.90$24.07 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBSACMTBRF
P/E now vs peer median 0.0xmedian 12.1x 11.2xmedian 12.1x 11.3xmedian 12.1x
P/S now vs peer median 2.8xmedian 3.4x 3.2xmedian 3.4x 3.2xmedian 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 0.0xmedian 5.0x —median 5.0x 6.5xmedian 5.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -486.3xmedian 10.9x 8.7xmedian 10.9x 14.6xmedian 10.9x
P/B now vs peer median 2.4xmedian 1.2x 1.1xmedian 1.2x 1.3xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.00median 1.34 3.30median 1.34 5.19median 1.34

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBSACMTBRF
Revenue – – $7.62B
Operating income $278.26B – –
Net income -$1.70T – $2.23B
Free cash flow – – $1.67B
EPS (diluted) $1,126.89 $19.72 $2.51
Cash & equivalents $2.20B – –
Total debt $47.85B – $7.63B
Shares (diluted) 471.12M 146.76M 857.00M
Enterprise value -$10.86T $31.97B $24.36B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBSACMTBRF
P/E 0.0x 11.2x 11.3x
P/FCF -486.3x 8.7x 14.6x
P/Operating cash flow – – 13.7x
P/S 2.8x 3.2x 3.2x
P/B 2.4x 1.1x 1.3x
P/Tangible book -0.2x 1.1x 1.4x
EV/EBITDA 0.0x – 6.5x
EV/EBIT 0.2x – 6.7x
EV/Revenue – – 4.2x
EV/FCF – – 19.1x
EV/Operating cash flow – – 18.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.00 3.30 5.19

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBSACMTBRF
Revenue growth (1Y) – – 4.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – -0.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -85.8% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 44.6% – –
Net income growth (1Y) -229.4% – 7.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -114.2% – -1.1%
EPS growth (1Y) -18.5% 17.7% 15.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 48.4% 3.4% 2.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – -33.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -6.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – -30.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -6.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBSACMTBRF
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – – 64.2%
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin – – 37.4%
Net margin – – 28.2%
FCF margin – – 21.9%
Operating cash flow margin – – 23.3%
Return on equity – – 11.8%
Return on assets 2,022% – 1.4%
Return on invested capital – – 14.6%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover – – 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – 0.8x
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBSACMTBRF
Debt / assets 63.2% – 4.7%
Debt / equity 7.7x – 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.0x – 1.6x
Debt / FCF – – 4.6x
Liabilities / assets 91.8% 87.2% 88.3%
Equity / assets 8.2% 12.8% 11.7%
Interest coverage – – 2.5x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio 0.1x – –
Cash ratio 0.1x – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBSACMTBRF
Dividend yield 4.7% 2.7% 3.9%
Net buyback yield – – 4.7%
Shareholder yield 4.7% 2.7% 8.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 41.1%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 55.0%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 1.8%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 8.5%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBSACMTBRF
Forward P/E 11.2xFY2026 10.8xFY2026 10.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.84FY2026 $20.48FY2026 $2.80FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +9.7%FY2026 +20.5%FY2026 +20.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +2.5% -0.4% -4.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.07BFY2026 $10.60BFY2026 $7.33BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -7.8%FY2026 +9.4%FY2026 -3.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +19.1% -4.7% +16.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBSACMTBRF
Held by institutions 4.7% 90.2% 84.8%
Institutions holding 157 1,148 1,104
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.7% -0.4% +2.9%
Institutions buying 82 524 558
Institutions selling 51 392 347
Buyers to sellers 1.61 1.34 1.61

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BSACMTBRF
BSAC 1.00 0.28 0.31
MTB 0.28 1.00 0.90
RF 0.31 0.90 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BSAC, MTB and RF?

M&T Bank (MTB) is the largest by market capitalisation: Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) $14.99B, M&T Bank (MTB) $31.97B, Regions Financial (RF) $24.29B.

Which stock is cheaper, BSAC, MTB and RF?

Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) 0.0x, M&T Bank (MTB) 11.2x, Regions Financial (RF) 11.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Regions Financial (RF) is cheapest (Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) 11.2x, M&T Bank (MTB) 10.8x, Regions Financial (RF) 10.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year M&T Bank (MTB) returned the most: Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) +12.3%, M&T Bank (MTB) +21.0%, Regions Financial (RF) +17.6%. Over five years, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) compounded fastest (Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) +11.9%/yr, M&T Bank (MTB) +8.4%/yr, Regions Financial (RF) +3.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) has the highest dividend yield: Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) 4.65%, M&T Bank (MTB) 2.71%, Regions Financial (RF) 3.88%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, M&T Bank (MTB) has been the steadiest (Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) 28.9%, M&T Bank (MTB) 21.3%, Regions Financial (RF) 23.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BSAC, MTB and RF?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.