BRSL vs ROP vs KHOBF Stock Comparison

Brightstar Lottery, Roper Technologies and Kheoba Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ROP Roper Technologies Inc
$438.14 +19.6% 1M -8.7% 1Y
Market cap
$44.36B
P/E
17.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$8.28B
Div. yield
–
ERP Software Technology
5 wins
KHOBF KHEOBA Ltd
$2.50 0.0% 1M 0.0% 1Y
Market cap
$20.23M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
ERP Software Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Roper Technologies leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Roper Technologies 5, Brightstar Lottery 4, Kheoba 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBRSLROPKHOBFLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.87B $44.36B $20.23M ROP
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 7.5x 17.7x — BRSL
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 16.9x 19.2x — BRSL
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +0.7% +10.9% — ROP
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 10.0% 30.2% — ROP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 14.1% 6.6% — BRSL
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.4x 3.4x — BRSL
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -43.5% -8.7% 0.0% KHOBF
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -20.3%/yr -2.1%/yr — ROP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 32.7% 31.4% 0.0% KHOBF
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 41/100 56/100 — ROP

Percentile Scorecard

BRSLROPKHOBF

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBRSLROPKHOBF
Valuation 61 #40 of 101 63 #38 of 101 –
Growth 24 #74 of 97 52 #47 of 97 –
Profitability 60 #38 of 94 83 #17 of 94 –
Financial Health 29 #78 of 109 38 #68 of 109 82 #21 of 109
Shareholder Returns 33 #43 of 64 46 #35 of 64 –
Overall 41 56 –
  • BRSL ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications
  • ROP ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications
  • KHOBF ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBRSLROPKHOBFSPY
1 month -7.6%+19.6%0.0% -1.0%
3 months -8.8%+19.3%0.0% +2.9%
6 months -26.6%+24.0%0.0% +6.4%
Year to date -38.8%-1.6%0.0% +11.4%
1 year -43.5%-8.7%0.0% +13.1%
3 years -68.9%-9.2%— +79.4%
3 years, per year -32.2%-3.2%— +21.5%
5 years -67.7%-10.1%— +67.7%
5 years, per year -20.3%-2.1%— +10.9%
10 years -66.7%+154.1%— +255.2%
10 years, per year -10.4%+9.8%— +13.5%

Risk

MeasureBRSLROPKHOBFSPY
Volatility, 1Y 32.7%31.4%0.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 34.2%33.8%— 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.84-0.070.00 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.33-0.28— 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -72.7%-46.9%-37.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -44.2%-8.7%0.0% -2.5%
52-week high $17.00$479.96$2.50 $779.14
52-week low $9.22$315.53$2.50 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBRSLROPKHOBF
P/E now vs peer median 7.5xmedian 29.9x 17.6xmedian 29.9x —median 29.9x
P/S now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 2.8x 5.2xmedian 2.8x —median 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 3.5xmedian 17.4x 16.7xmedian 17.4x —median 17.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median -1.2xmedian 16.9x 16.5xmedian 16.9x —median 16.9x
P/B now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 3.1x 2.3xmedian 3.1x 122.0xmedian 3.1x
PEG now vs peer median -0.80median 0.86 -6.48median 0.86 —median 0.86

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBRSLROPKHOBF
Revenue $2.47B $8.28B –
Gross profit $1.32B $5.76B –
Operating income $1.07B $2.32B –
Net income $366.00M $2.50B –
Free cash flow -$1.47B $2.62B –
R&D $52.00M – –
EPS (diluted) $1.26 $24.89 –
Cash & equivalents $558.00M $364.90M $318.16K
Total debt $19.09B $40.10B –
Shares (diluted) 197.00M 100.60M 8.09M
Enterprise value -$2.98B $42.99B $19.91M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBRSLROPKHOBF
P/E 7.5x 17.6x –
P/FCF -1.2x 16.5x –
P/Operating cash flow -1.0x 16.2x –
P/S 0.7x 5.2x –
P/B 0.9x 2.3x 122.0x
P/Tangible book 0.9x 4.6x 125.8x
EV/EBITDA 3.5x 16.7x –
EV/EBIT 5.2x 23.4x –
EV/Revenue 2.3x 6.6x –
EV/FCF -3.8x 20.7x –
EV/Operating cash flow -3.0x 20.3x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.80 -6.48 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBRSLROPKHOBF
Revenue growth (1Y) 0.7% 10.9% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 9.1% 12.7% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) -4.0% 11.9% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 151.4% 12.6% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 88.2% 10.5% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -2.1% 12.1% –
Net income growth (1Y) 8.9% 62.7% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) -4.5% -4.8% –
EPS growth (1Y) 33.1% 75.3% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) -9.4% -2.7% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -265.1% 10.7% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -60.6% 34.0% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -207.8% 12.3% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -58.7% 35.4% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBRSLROPKHOBF
Gross margin 53.5% 69.5% –
EBITDA margin 65.3% 39.3% –
Operating margin 43.2% 28.0% –
Pretax margin 24.4% 35.9% –
Net margin 10.0% 30.2% –
FCF margin -59.6% 31.7% –
Operating cash flow margin -74.7% 32.2% –
Return on equity 17.7% 13.3% –
Return on assets 4.2% 7.2% –
Return on invested capital 14.1% 6.6% –
Return on capital employed 14.2% 7.4% –
Asset turnover 0.3x 0.2x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -5.0x 1.1x –
Stock comp / revenue 0.7% 2.3% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBRSLROPKHOBF
Debt / assets 54.2% 32.2% –
Debt / equity 2.2x 0.6x –
Net debt / EBITDA 2.4x 3.4x –
Debt / FCF -3.0x 4.3x –
Liabilities / assets 74.9% 46.8% 49.8%
Equity / assets 25.1% 53.2% 50.2%
Interest coverage – 5.9x –
Current ratio 1.1x 0.6x 2.0x
Quick ratio 0.5x 0.4x 2.0x
Cash ratio 0.5x 0.1x 1.9x
Altman Z-score 0.86 2.72 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBRSLROPKHOBF
Dividend yield 9.6% 0.8% –
Net buyback yield -17.8% 6.2% –
Shareholder yield -8.2% 7.1% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBRSLROPKHOBF
Forward P/E 16.9xFY2026 19.2xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $0.56FY2026 $22.80FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY -38.5%FY2026 +14.0%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +28.6% +12.3% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.56BFY2026 $8.28BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +2.1%FY2026 +4.8%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after -2.1% +16.1% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBRSLROPKHOBF
Held by institutions 44.1% 100.0% –
Institutions holding 200 1,075 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.8% +6.7% –
Institutions buying 97 415 –
Institutions selling 58 522 –
Buyers to sellers 1.67 0.80 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BRSLROPKHOBF
BRSL 1.00 0.29 –
ROP 0.29 1.00 –
KHOBF – – –

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BRSL, ROP and KHOBF?

Roper Technologies (ROP) is the largest by market capitalisation: Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) $1.87B, Roper Technologies (ROP) $44.36B, Kheoba (KHOBF) $20.23M.

Which stock is cheaper, BRSL, ROP and KHOBF?

Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) 7.5x, Roper Technologies (ROP) 17.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) is cheapest (Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) 16.9x, Roper Technologies (ROP) 19.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Roper Technologies (ROP) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) +0.7%, Roper Technologies (ROP) +10.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Roper Technologies (ROP) has the highest net margin (Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) 10.0%, Roper Technologies (ROP) 30.2%). On return on invested capital, Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) leads (Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) 14.1%, Roper Technologies (ROP) 6.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Kheoba (KHOBF) returned the most: Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) -43.5%, Roper Technologies (ROP) -8.7%, Kheoba (KHOBF) 0.0%. Over five years, Roper Technologies (ROP) compounded fastest (Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) -20.3%/yr, Roper Technologies (ROP) -2.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Kheoba (KHOBF) has been the steadiest (Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) 32.7%, Roper Technologies (ROP) 31.4%, Kheoba (KHOBF) 0.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BRSL, ROP and KHOBF?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Roper Technologies (ROP) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.