BRSL vs P vs NTWK Stock Comparison

Brightstar Lottery, Everpure and Netsol Technologies Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
P Everpure, Inc.
$131.41 +4.3% 1M +40.1% 1Y
Market cap
$46.23B
P/E
182.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.26B
Div. yield
–
Server and Storage Hardware Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Everpure leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Everpure 4, Brightstar Lottery 4, Netsol Technologies 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBRSLPNTWKLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.86B $46.23B $98.71M P
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 7.5x 182.5x 30.8x BRSL
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 17.0x 44.4x 17.1x BRSL
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +0.7% +27.2% — P
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 10.0% 5.9% — BRSL
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 14.1% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.4x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -42.7% +40.1% +75.8% NTWK
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -20.4%/yr +37.8%/yr +11.3%/yr P
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 32.7% 73.0% 57.7% BRSL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 41/100 51/100 — P

Percentile Scorecard

BRSLPNTWK

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBRSLPNTWK
Valuation 60 #41 of 102 16 #93 of 111 93 #8 of 102
Growth 24 #75 of 98 78 #25 of 108 –
Profitability 60 #39 of 95 64 #38 of 104 –
Financial Health 29 #78 of 109 33 #77 of 115 85 #17 of 109
Shareholder Returns 35 #42 of 64 61 #32 of 81 –
Overall 41 51 –
  • BRSL ranked among 115 companies in Business Applications
  • P ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • NTWK ranked among 115 companies in Business Applications

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBRSLPNTWKSPY
1 month -4.4%+4.3%+57.1% -0.8%
3 months -9.2%+77.1%+79.1% +3.5%
6 months -26.0%+77.7%+122.5% +7.0%
Year to date -38.6%+96.1%+154.1% +12.2%
1 year -42.7%+40.1%+75.8% +13.0%
3 years -64.7%+298.8%+311.8% +86.3%
3 years, per year -29.4%+58.6%+60.3% +23.1%
5 years -68.1%+396.8%+70.7% +68.6%
5 years, per year -20.4%+37.8%+11.3% +11.0%
10 years -66.5%+948.8%+22.2% +258.0%
10 years, per year -10.4%+26.5%+2.0% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureBRSLPNTWKSPY
Volatility, 1Y 32.7%73.0%57.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 34.3%82.7%60.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.842.620.49 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.310.551.31 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -72.7%-48.6%-69.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -44.1%-16.3%-2.0% -1.8%
52-week high $17.00$156.95$7.86 $779.14
52-week low $9.22$56.99$2.80 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBRSLPNTWK
P/E now vs peer median 7.6xmedian 28.8x 172.7xmedian 32.0x 30.8xmedian 28.8x
P/S now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 2.8x 10.3xmedian 2.8x 1.2xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 3.5xmedian 17.7x 111.4xmedian 19.4x —median 17.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median -1.2xmedian 15.8x 341.7xmedian 29.0x 10.0xmedian 15.8x
P/B now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 3.2x 28.4xmedian 2.9x 1.8xmedian 3.2x
PEG now vs peer median -0.81median 0.85 0.31median 1.13 —median 0.85

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBRSLPNTWK
Revenue $2.47B $4.26B –
Gross profit $1.32B $2.97B –
Operating income $1.07B $224.21M –
Net income $366.00M $253.29M –
Free cash flow -$1.47B $128.17M –
R&D $52.00M $1.05B –
EPS (diluted) $1.26 $0.73 –
Cash & equivalents $558.00M $385.69M $27.12M
Total debt $19.09B – $8.40M
Shares (diluted) 197.00M 345.59M 11.83M
Enterprise value -$3.00B $40.64B $13.40M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBRSLPNTWK
P/E 7.6x 172.7x 30.8x
P/FCF -1.2x 341.7x 10.0x
P/Operating cash flow -1.0x 102.4x –
P/S 0.7x 10.3x 1.2x
P/B 0.9x 28.4x 1.8x
P/Tangible book 0.9x 28.9x 2.0x
EV/EBITDA 3.5x 111.4x –
EV/EBIT 5.2x 190.8x –
EV/Revenue 2.3x 10.0x –
EV/FCF -3.8x 333.8x –
EV/Operating cash flow -3.0x 100.0x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.81 0.31 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBRSLPNTWK
Revenue growth (1Y) 0.7% 27.2% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 9.1% 15.5% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) -4.0% 28.3% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 151.4% 15.5% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 88.2% 195.6% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -2.1% 277.6% –
Net income growth (1Y) 8.9% 82.0% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) -4.5% 574.2% –
EPS growth (1Y) 33.1% 77.8% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) -9.4% 550.0% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -265.1% -46.6% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -60.6% -13.6% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -207.8% -76.7% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -58.7% -34.5% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBRSLPNTWK
Gross margin 53.5% 69.7% –
EBITDA margin 65.3% 9.0% –
Operating margin 43.2% 5.3% –
Pretax margin 24.4% 6.6% –
Net margin 10.0% 5.9% –
FCF margin -59.6% 3.0% –
Operating cash flow margin -74.7% 10.0% –
Return on equity 17.7% 17.0% –
Return on assets 4.2% 5.1% –
Return on invested capital 14.1% – –
Return on capital employed 14.2% 8.0% –
Asset turnover 0.3x 0.9x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -5.0x 1.7x –
Stock comp / revenue 0.7% 12.9% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBRSLPNTWK
Debt / assets 54.2% – 10.8%
Debt / equity 2.2x – 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.4x – –
Debt / FCF -3.0x – –
Liabilities / assets 74.9% 70.5% 36.3%
Equity / assets 25.1% 29.5% 63.7%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 1.1x 1.5x 2.1x
Quick ratio 0.5x 1.3x 1.9x
Cash ratio 0.5x 0.5x 1.0x
Altman Z-score 0.86 8.07 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBRSLPNTWK
Dividend yield 9.6% – –
Net buyback yield -17.7% 0.6% –
Shareholder yield -8.2% 0.6% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBRSLPNTWK
Forward P/E 17.0xFY2026 44.4xFY2026 17.1xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year $0.56FY2026 $2.96FY2026 $0.45FY2027
EPS growth, next FY -38.5%FY2026 +43.7%FY2026 +80.0%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after +28.6% +48.6% +44.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.56BFY2026 $4.74BFY2026 $81.77MFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +2.1%FY2026 +29.5%FY2026 +9.9%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after -2.1% +41.5% +20.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBRSLPNTWK
Held by institutions 44.1% 83.0% 17.2%
Institutions holding 200 804 26
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.8% +2.2% -11.9%
Institutions buying 97 442 11
Institutions selling 58 259 8
Buyers to sellers 1.67 1.71 1.38

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BRSLPNTWK
BRSL 1.00 0.06 0.09
P 0.06 1.00 0.07
NTWK 0.09 0.07 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BRSL, P and NTWK?

Everpure (P) is the largest by market capitalisation: Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) $1.86B, Everpure (P) $46.23B, Netsol Technologies (NTWK) $98.71M.

Which stock is cheaper, BRSL, P and NTWK?

Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) 7.5x, Everpure (P) 182.5x, Netsol Technologies (NTWK) 30.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) is cheapest (Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) 17.0x, Everpure (P) 44.4x, Netsol Technologies (NTWK) 17.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Everpure (P) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) +0.7%, Everpure (P) +27.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) has the highest net margin (Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) 10.0%, Everpure (P) 5.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Netsol Technologies (NTWK) returned the most: Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) -42.7%, Everpure (P) +40.1%, Netsol Technologies (NTWK) +75.8%. Over five years, Everpure (P) compounded fastest (Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) -20.4%/yr, Everpure (P) +37.8%/yr, Netsol Technologies (NTWK) +11.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) has been the steadiest (Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) 32.7%, Everpure (P) 73.0%, Netsol Technologies (NTWK) 57.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BRSL, P and NTWK?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Everpure (P) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.