BRLT vs BMHL Stock Comparison

Brilliant Earth and Bluemount Holdings Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group

Head to Head

3 decided of 12

Bluemount Holdings leads on 2 of the 12 questions below (Bluemount Holdings 2, Brilliant Earth 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBRLTBMHLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $24.93M $76.50M BMHL
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -5.5x 31.9x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 21.3x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +6.4% — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -1.0% — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -43.3% -5.3% BMHL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -33.6%/yr — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 61.5% 71.0% BRLT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 27/100 — –

Percentile Scorecard

BRLTBMHL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBRLTBMHL
Valuation 42 #27 of 46 7 #104 of 112
Growth 5 #41 of 43 –
Profitability 20 #34 of 42 –
Financial Health 42 #31 of 53 47 #67 of 125
Shareholder Returns 27 #25 of 34 –
Overall 27 –
  • BRLT ranked among 53 companies in Apparel and Luxury
  • BMHL ranked among 130 companies in Business Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBRLTBMHLSPY
1 month +8.8%-43.0% -0.8%
3 months +34.2%-45.7% +3.5%
6 months +4.9%-13.8% +7.0%
Year to date -14.9%-8.1% +12.2%
1 year -43.3%-5.3% +13.0%
3 years -44.2%— +86.3%
3 years, per year -17.7%— +23.1%
5 years -87.1%— +68.6%
5 years, per year -33.6%— +11.0%

Risk

MeasureBRLTBMHLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 61.5%71.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 64.5%80.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.670.27 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.70-0.07 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -94.7%-50.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -46.8%-50.3% -1.8%
52-week high $2.80$6.16 $779.14
52-week low $1.03$3.06 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBRLTBMHL
P/E now vs peer median -5.5xmedian 16.6x 31.9xmedian 21.9x
P/S now vs peer median 0.3xmedian 0.7x 9,615xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -28.7xmedian 9.7x —median 12.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 52.6xmedian 12.2x -15,921xmedian 14.3x
P/B now vs peer median 2.1xmedian 2.2x 6,936xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.08median 0.64 —median 1.02

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBRLTBMHL
Revenue $449.28M –
Gross profit $253.67M –
Operating income -$9.08M –
Net income -$9.63M –
Free cash flow $2.88M –
EPS (diluted) $-0.04 –
Cash & equivalents $74.95M $939.29
Shares (diluted) 101.68M 25.09M
Enterprise value -$261.10M $65.99M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBRLTBMHL
P/E -5.5x 31.9x
P/FCF 52.6x -15,921x
P/Operating cash flow 23.6x –
P/S 0.3x 9,615x
P/B 2.1x 6,936x
P/Tangible book 2.1x 6,936x
EV/EBITDA -28.7x –
EV/EBIT -8.5x –
EV/Revenue 0.2x –
EV/FCF 26.6x –
EV/Operating cash flow 12.0x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.08 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBRLTBMHL
Revenue growth (1Y) 6.4% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 0.8% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 1.2% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 1.4% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -167.3% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -38.7% –
Net income growth (1Y) -240.6% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) -40.2% –
EPS growth (1Y) -55.0% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) -70.4% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -64.4% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -32.1% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -77.2% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -22.9% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBRLTBMHL
Gross margin 56.5% –
EBITDA margin -0.6% –
Operating margin -2.0% –
Pretax margin 0.6% –
Net margin -1.0% –
FCF margin 0.6% –
Operating cash flow margin 1.4% –
Return on equity -13.3% –
Return on assets -5.1% –
Return on invested capital – –
Return on capital employed -8.9% –
Asset turnover 2.4x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.7x –
Stock comp / revenue 1.6% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBRLTBMHL
Debt / assets – 7,223%
Debt / equity – 82.8x
Net debt / EBITDA – –
Debt / FCF – –
Liabilities / assets 62.7% 12.7%
Equity / assets 37.3% 87.3%
Interest coverage -33.4x –
Current ratio 1.6x –
Quick ratio 0.8x –
Cash ratio 0.8x –
Altman Z-score 3.15 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBRLTBMHL
Dividend yield – –
Net buyback yield 0.1% –
Shareholder yield 0.1% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBRLTBMHL
Forward P/E 21.3xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $0.07FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +57.1% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $433.88MFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY -0.8%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +19.9% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBRLTBMHL
Held by institutions 4.2% –
Institutions holding 36 –
Change in shares held, QoQ -4.5% –
Institutions buying 16 –
Institutions selling 8 –
Buyers to sellers 2.00 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BRLTBMHL
BRLT 1.00 0.03
BMHL 0.03 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BRLT and BMHL?

Bluemount Holdings (BMHL) is the largest by market capitalisation: Brilliant Earth (BRLT) $24.93M, Bluemount Holdings (BMHL) $76.50M.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Bluemount Holdings (BMHL) returned the most: Brilliant Earth (BRLT) -43.3%, Bluemount Holdings (BMHL) -5.3%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Brilliant Earth (BRLT) has been the steadiest (Brilliant Earth (BRLT) 61.5%, Bluemount Holdings (BMHL) 71.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do BRLT and BMHL move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.03, a weak relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, BRLT and BMHL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Bluemount Holdings (BMHL) leads on 2. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.