BRID vs PEP vs SENEA Stock Comparison

Bridgford Foods, Pepsico and Seneca Foods Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BRID Bridgford Foods Corp
$5.35 -7.8% 1M -32.8% 1Y
Market cap
$48.47M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$228.22M
Div. yield
–
Snacks and Confectionery Consumer Staples
1 win
PEP Pepsico Inc
$135.46 +5.3% 1M -10.6% 1Y
Market cap
$182.59B
P/E
16.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$98.24B
Div. yield
–
Non-Alcoholic Beverages Consumer Staples
4 wins
SENEA Seneca Foods Corp
$157.50 -13.8% 1M +36.3% 1Y
Market cap
$1.06B
P/E
8.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.77B
Div. yield
–
Packaged Foods Consumer Staples
6 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Seneca Foods leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Seneca Foods 6, Pepsico 4, Bridgford Foods 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBRIDPEPSENEALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $48.47M $182.59B $1.06B PEP
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -3.3x 16.8x 8.9x SENEA
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 15.8x 10.8x SENEA
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +0.4% +6.4% +12.5% SENEA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -6.4% 11.1% 6.7% PEP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -13.3% 16.1% 11.6% PEP
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.6x 2.2x 0.6x BRID
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -32.8% -10.6% +36.3% SENEA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -14.8%/yr -3.4%/yr +25.0%/yr SENEA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 39.1% 21.4% 41.2% PEP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 39/100 64/100 81/100 SENEA

Percentile Scorecard

BRIDPEPSENEA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBRIDPEPSENEA
Valuation 46 #25 of 45 62 #15 of 38 100 #1 of 45
Growth 7 #39 of 42 59 #14 of 33 90 #5 of 42
Profitability 21 #32 of 40 87 #5 of 31 95 #3 of 40
Financial Health 83 #9 of 47 35 #25 of 38 85 #8 of 47
Shareholder Returns – 77 #6 of 23 33 #21 of 31
Overall 39 64 81
  • BRID ranked among 48 companies in Branded Foods
  • PEP ranked among 41 companies in Beverages
  • SENEA ranked among 48 companies in Branded Foods

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBRIDPEPSENEASPY
1 month -7.8%+5.3%-13.8% -0.8%
3 months -16.1%-3.1%-5.3% +3.5%
6 months -27.5%-12.1%+15.9% +7.0%
Year to date -31.4%-5.6%+42.4% +12.2%
1 year -32.8%-10.6%+36.3% +13.0%
3 years -48.4%-15.1%+186.5% +86.3%
3 years, per year -19.8%-5.3%+42.1% +23.1%
5 years -55.2%-15.7%+204.9% +68.6%
5 years, per year -14.8%-3.4%+25.0% +11.0%
10 years -56.6%+26.5%+448.8% +258.0%
10 years, per year -8.0%+2.4%+18.6% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureBRIDPEPSENEASPY
Volatility, 1Y 39.1%21.4%41.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 40.1%20.3%43.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.06-0.180.06 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.84-0.500.88 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -65.4%-36.9%-51.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -37.1%-20.5%-24.0% -1.8%
52-week high $8.50$170.49$207.30 $779.14
52-week low $5.34$123.73$101.18 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBRIDPEPSENEA
P/E now vs peer median -3.3xmedian 20.5x 17.0xmedian 26.6x 8.9xmedian 20.5x
P/S now vs peer median 0.2xmedian 0.8x 1.9xmedian 1.5x 0.6xmedian 0.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -4.1xmedian 12.3x 12.0xmedian 14.2x 6.1xmedian 12.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median -8.1xmedian 14.0x 17.6xmedian 18.3x 4.6xmedian 14.0x
P/B now vs peer median 0.5xmedian 1.4x 8.2xmedian 2.6x 1.4xmedian 1.4x
PEG now vs peer median 0.04median 0.42 1.70median 2.09 0.13median 0.42

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBRIDPEPSENEA
Revenue $228.22M $98.24B $1.77B
Gross profit $42.99M $53.22B $237.25M
Operating income -$20.09M $15.05B $151.41M
Net income -$14.52M $10.97B $119.30M
Free cash flow -$6.00M $10.47B $229.66M
EPS (diluted) $-1.60 $7.97 $17.44
Cash & equivalents $333.00K $10.68B $86.92M
Total debt $17.34M $208.67B $1.01B
Shares (diluted) 9.08M 1.37B 6.84M
Enterprise value $41.62M $140.35B $867.89M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBRIDPEPSENEA
P/E -3.3x 17.0x 8.9x
P/FCF -8.1x 17.6x 4.6x
P/Operating cash flow -11.9x 12.7x 3.8x
P/S 0.2x 1.9x 0.6x
P/B 0.5x 8.2x 1.4x
P/Tangible book 0.5x 21.7x 1.4x
EV/EBITDA -4.1x 12.0x 6.1x
EV/EBIT -2.8x 15.0x 7.9x
EV/Revenue 0.2x 2.3x 0.7x
EV/FCF -9.5x 21.5x 5.2x
EV/Operating cash flow -13.9x 15.5x 4.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.04 1.70 0.13

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBRIDPEPSENEA
Revenue growth (1Y) 0.4% 6.4% 12.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -3.5% 2.4% 4.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -18.8% 6.8% 58.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -14.9% 2.5% 20.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) -107.0% 47.7% 100.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -89.7% 10.6% 44.4%
Net income growth (1Y) -100.0% 50.8% 174.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -74.2% 9.4% 63.6%
EPS growth (1Y) -100.0% 51.4% 178.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -74.6% 10.0% 70.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 55.8% 23.9% -17.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -14.3% 6.3% 54.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 52.1% 54.3% -24.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -1.2% 14.7% 44.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBRIDPEPSENEA
Gross margin 18.8% 54.2% 13.4%
EBITDA margin -6.1% 19.1% 11.0%
Operating margin -8.8% 15.3% 8.6%
Pretax margin -8.4% 14.0% 8.8%
Net margin -6.4% 11.1% 6.7%
FCF margin -2.6% 10.7% 13.0%
Operating cash flow margin -1.8% 14.8% 15.8%
Return on equity -13.4% 49.0% 15.6%
Return on assets -10.1% 9.8% 9.5%
Return on invested capital -13.3% 16.1% 11.6%
Return on capital employed -17.0% 19.4% 14.5%
Asset turnover 1.6x 0.9x 1.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.3x 1.3x 2.3x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.3% 0.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBRIDPEPSENEA
Debt / assets 6.2% 46.3% 16.7%
Debt / equity 0.1x 2.3x 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.6x 2.2x 0.6x
Debt / FCF -1.5x 5.0x 0.9x
Liabilities / assets 23.6% 79.9% 38.7%
Equity / assets 76.4% 20.1% 61.3%
Interest coverage – 13.6x 9.5x
Current ratio 2.4x 0.9x 3.8x
Quick ratio 0.8x 0.7x 0.9x
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.3x 0.4x
Altman Z-score 3.30 3.48 4.63

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBRIDPEPSENEA
Dividend yield – 4.3% –
Net buyback yield – 0.5% 1.3%
Shareholder yield 0.0% 4.7% 1.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBRIDPEPSENEA
Forward P/E – 15.8xFY2026 10.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $8.59FY2026 $14.58FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +5.5%FY2026 -12.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +3.0% +3.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $96.43BFY2026 $1.98BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +2.7%FY2026 +19.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +11.4% +1.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBRIDPEPSENEA
Held by institutions 5.3% 79.1% 77.0%
Institutions holding 17 3,414 220
Change in shares held, QoQ -4.1% +5.8% +8.7%
Institutions buying 6 1,500 134
Institutions selling 3 1,515 53
Buyers to sellers 2.00 0.99 2.53

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BRIDPEPSENEA
BRID 1.00 0.12 -0.07
PEP 0.12 1.00 0.17
SENEA -0.07 0.17 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BRID, PEP and SENEA?

Pepsico (PEP) is the largest by market capitalisation: Bridgford Foods (BRID) $48.47M, Pepsico (PEP) $182.59B, Seneca Foods (SENEA) $1.06B.

Which stock is cheaper, BRID, PEP and SENEA?

Seneca Foods (SENEA) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Bridgford Foods (BRID) -3.3x, Pepsico (PEP) 16.8x, Seneca Foods (SENEA) 8.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Seneca Foods (SENEA) is cheapest (Pepsico (PEP) 15.8x, Seneca Foods (SENEA) 10.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Seneca Foods (SENEA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Bridgford Foods (BRID) +0.4%, Pepsico (PEP) +6.4%, Seneca Foods (SENEA) +12.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Pepsico (PEP) has the highest net margin (Bridgford Foods (BRID) -6.4%, Pepsico (PEP) 11.1%, Seneca Foods (SENEA) 6.7%). On return on invested capital, Pepsico (PEP) leads (Bridgford Foods (BRID) -13.3%, Pepsico (PEP) 16.1%, Seneca Foods (SENEA) 11.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Seneca Foods (SENEA) returned the most: Bridgford Foods (BRID) -32.8%, Pepsico (PEP) -10.6%, Seneca Foods (SENEA) +36.3%. Over five years, Seneca Foods (SENEA) compounded fastest (Bridgford Foods (BRID) -14.8%/yr, Pepsico (PEP) -3.4%/yr, Seneca Foods (SENEA) +25.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Pepsico (PEP) has been the steadiest (Bridgford Foods (BRID) 39.1%, Pepsico (PEP) 21.4%, Seneca Foods (SENEA) 41.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BRID, PEP and SENEA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Seneca Foods (SENEA) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.