BRIA vs KTB vs WRBY Stock Comparison

BrilliA, Kontoor Brands and Warby Parker Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BRIA BrilliA Inc
$1.40 -6.7% 1M -27.8% 1Y
Market cap
$36.00M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Apparel Consumer Discretionary
KTB Kontoor Brands, Inc.
$74.87 +14.6% 1M -13.0% 1Y
Market cap
$4.09B
P/E
16.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.95B
Div. yield
–
Apparel Consumer Discretionary
8 wins
WRBY Warby Parker Inc.
$25.08 -6.1% 1M +16.7% 1Y
Market cap
$3.02B
P/E
390.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$911.61M
Div. yield
–
Apparel Consumer Discretionary
1 win

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Kontoor Brands leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Kontoor Brands 8, Warby Parker 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBRIAKTBWRBYLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $36.00M $4.09B $3.02B KTB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -2,258x 16.4x 390.0x KTB
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 20.0x 13.7x 57.0x KTB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +18.6% +11.0% KTB
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 8.5% 0.8% KTB
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 14.5% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -27.8% -13.0% +16.7% WRBY
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +7.2%/yr -14.5%/yr KTB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 66.5% 47.8% 75.7% KTB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 52/100 44/100 KTB

Percentile Scorecard

BRIAKTBWRBY

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBRIAKTBWRBY
Valuation 34 #30 of 45 23 #35 of 45 5 #43 of 45
Growth – 57 #19 of 43 81 #9 of 43
Profitability – 88 #6 of 41 35 #27 of 41
Financial Health 71 #16 of 52 31 #36 of 52 80 #11 of 52
Shareholder Returns – 61 #14 of 34 18 #28 of 34
Overall – 52 44
  • BRIA ranked among 52 companies in Apparel and Luxury
  • KTB ranked among 52 companies in Apparel and Luxury
  • WRBY ranked among 52 companies in Apparel and Luxury

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBRIAKTBWRBYSPY
1 month -6.7%+14.6%-6.1% -0.2%
3 months +13.8%-15.0%-3.5% +3.9%
6 months -17.2%+3.9%+11.3% +8.2%
Year to date -11.9%+22.6%+15.1% +12.9%
1 year -27.8%-13.0%+16.7% +12.3%
3 years —+60.5%+94.7% +87.4%
3 years, per year —+17.1%+24.9% +23.3%
5 years —+41.8%-54.4% +67.9%
5 years, per year —+7.2%-14.5% +10.9%

Risk

MeasureBRIAKTBWRBYSPY
Volatility, 1Y 66.5%47.8%75.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 76.0%45.8%67.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.080.782.13 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.42-0.270.22 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -74.1%-48.3%-83.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -38.3%-15.1%-17.3% -1.2%
52-week high $2.27$88.17$30.34 $779.14
52-week low $1.10$57.48$16.49 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBRIAKTBWRBY
P/E now vs peer median -2,258xmedian 16.4x 16.5xmedian 16.4x 401.5xmedian 16.4x
P/S now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 0.7x 1.4xmedian 0.7x 3.4xmedian 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 9.9x —median 9.9x 47.5xmedian 9.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 209.6xmedian 12.0x —median 12.0x 142.2xmedian 12.0x
P/B now vs peer median 2.4xmedian 2.2x 6.6xmedian 2.2x 7.9xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.64 2.19median 0.64 14.29median 0.64

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBRIAKTBWRBY
Revenue – $2.95B $911.61M
Gross profit – $1.38B $498.49M
Operating income – $332.45M $1.55M
Net income – $249.37M $7.74M
Free cash flow – – $21.75M
EPS (diluted) – $4.49 $0.06
Cash & equivalents $5.14M $58.46M $292.67M
Total debt – $1.14B –
Shares (diluted) 25.00M 55.50M 125.75M
Enterprise value $5.88M $3.78B $1.87B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBRIAKTBWRBY
P/E -2,258x 16.5x 401.5x
P/FCF 209.6x – 142.2x
P/Operating cash flow – – 32.4x
P/S 0.7x 1.4x 3.4x
P/B 2.4x 6.6x 7.9x
P/Tangible book 2.4x 24.0x 7.9x
EV/EBITDA – – 47.5x
EV/EBIT – 15.6x 1,804x
EV/Revenue – 1.8x 3.1x
EV/FCF – – 128.8x
EV/Operating cash flow – – 29.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 2.19 14.29

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBRIAKTBWRBY
Revenue growth (1Y) – 18.6% 11.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 4.0% 12.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 22.2% 11.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 7.9% 12.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) – 6.3% 108.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 1.5% 26.4%
Net income growth (1Y) – -0.8% 183.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 6.7% 28.7%
EPS growth (1Y) – 0.1% 181.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 7.5% 28.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – -18.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 22.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – -58.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 249.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBRIAKTBWRBY
Gross margin – 46.8% 54.7%
EBITDA margin – – 6.5%
Operating margin – 11.3% 0.2%
Pretax margin – 9.8% 1.1%
Net margin – 8.5% 0.8%
FCF margin – – 2.4%
Operating cash flow margin – – 10.5%
Return on equity – 41.3% 2.0%
Return on assets – 9.3% 1.0%
Return on invested capital – 14.5% –
Return on capital employed – 16.6% 0.3%
Asset turnover – 1.1x 1.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – 12.3x
Stock comp / revenue – – 3.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBRIAKTBWRBY
Debt / assets – 42.9% –
Debt / equity – 1.8x –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 46.1% 76.8% 49.2%
Equity / assets 53.9% 23.2% 50.8%
Interest coverage – 4.9x –
Current ratio 2.2x 1.8x 2.3x
Quick ratio 1.5x 0.5x 1.8x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.1x 1.8x
Altman Z-score – 3.10 5.16

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBRIAKTBWRBY
Dividend yield – 2.8% –
Net buyback yield – – -0.1%
Shareholder yield 0.0% 2.8% -0.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBRIAKTBWRBY
Forward P/E 20.0xFY2026 13.7xFY2026 57.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.07FY2026 $5.45FY2026 $0.44FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -2.5%FY2026 +22.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +128.6% +12.1% +36.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $57.06MFY2026 $2.85BFY2026 $920.99MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +16.5%FY2026 -9.5%FY2026 +5.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +34.7% -5.1% +30.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBRIAKTBWRBY
Held by institutions – 100.0% 100.0%
Institutions holding – 429 301
Change in shares held, QoQ – +6.9% +15.2%
Institutions buying – 214 195
Institutions selling – 137 77
Buyers to sellers – 1.56 2.53

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BRIAKTBWRBY
BRIA 1.00 0.09 -0.02
KTB 0.09 1.00 0.23
WRBY -0.02 0.23 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BRIA, KTB and WRBY?

Kontoor Brands (KTB) is the largest by market capitalisation: BrilliA (BRIA) $36.00M, Kontoor Brands (KTB) $4.09B, Warby Parker (WRBY) $3.02B.

Which stock is cheaper, BRIA, KTB and WRBY?

Kontoor Brands (KTB) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (BrilliA (BRIA) -2,258x, Kontoor Brands (KTB) 16.4x, Warby Parker (WRBY) 390.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Kontoor Brands (KTB) is cheapest (BrilliA (BRIA) 20.0x, Kontoor Brands (KTB) 13.7x, Warby Parker (WRBY) 57.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Kontoor Brands (KTB) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Kontoor Brands (KTB) +18.6%, Warby Parker (WRBY) +11.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Kontoor Brands (KTB) has the highest net margin (Kontoor Brands (KTB) 8.5%, Warby Parker (WRBY) 0.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Warby Parker (WRBY) returned the most: BrilliA (BRIA) -27.8%, Kontoor Brands (KTB) -13.0%, Warby Parker (WRBY) +16.7%. Over five years, Kontoor Brands (KTB) compounded fastest (Kontoor Brands (KTB) +7.2%/yr, Warby Parker (WRBY) -14.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Kontoor Brands (KTB) has been the steadiest (BrilliA (BRIA) 66.5%, Kontoor Brands (KTB) 47.8%, Warby Parker (WRBY) 75.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BRIA, KTB and WRBY?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Kontoor Brands (KTB) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.