BRBI vs CLUS vs CEPF Stock Comparison

BRBI BR Partners, Cluster Group Holdings and Cantor Equity Partners IV Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BRBI BRBI BR Partners S.A.
$10.40 -7.5% 1M -27.7% 1Y
Market cap
$2.96B
P/E
98.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$111.41M
Div. yield
–
Investment Banking Financial Services

Head to Head

4 decided of 12

Cluster Group Holdings leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Cluster Group Holdings 3, Cantor Equity Partners IV 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBRBICLUSCEPFLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.96B $8.00B $463.50M CLUS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 98.4x -1,146,093x 46.0x CEPF
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +4.4% — — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 27.0% — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 703.2% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.3x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -27.7% 0.0% -2.2% CLUS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -39.1%/yr — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 78.0% 0.0% 4.1% CLUS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 60/100 — — –

Percentile Scorecard

BRBICLUSCEPF

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBRBICLUSCEPF
Valuation 28 #70 of 97 – –
Growth 57 #30 of 68 78 #16 of 68 –
Profitability 49 #35 of 67 – –
Financial Health 78 #22 of 97 – 59 #40 of 97
Shareholder Returns 90 #5 of 40 – –
Overall 60 – –
  • BRBI ranked among 112 companies in Capital Markets
  • CLUS ranked among 112 companies in Capital Markets
  • CEPF ranked among 112 companies in Capital Markets

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBRBICLUSCEPFSPY
1 month -7.5%0.0%0.0% -0.8%
3 months -9.2%0.0%-1.7% +3.5%
6 months -29.3%0.0%+0.4% +7.0%
Year to date -25.1%0.0%+0.2% +12.2%
1 year -27.7%0.0%-2.2% +13.0%
3 years —-31.5%— +86.3%
3 years, per year —-11.9%— +23.1%
5 years —-91.6%— +68.6%
5 years, per year —-39.1%— +11.0%
10 years —+33.3%— +258.0%
10 years, per year —+2.9%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureBRBICLUSCEPFSPY
Volatility, 1Y 78.0%0.0%4.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 97.3%—4.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.120.000.03 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.35—-0.54 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -62.1%-99.5%-4.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -36.4%0.0%-3.0% -1.8%
52-week high $16.35$200.00$10.62 $779.14
52-week low $9.10$200.00$10.14 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBRBICLUSCEPF
P/E now vs peer median 108.8xmedian 29.4x -1,146,093xmedian 29.4x 46.0xmedian 29.4x
P/S now vs peer median 29.4xmedian 2.9x —median 2.9x —median 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 13.7x —median 13.7x —median 13.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median -143.5xmedian 16.0x —median 16.0x —median 16.0x
P/B now vs peer median 21.0xmedian 2.3x -105,257xmedian 2.3x -2,717xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.52 —median 0.52 —median 0.52

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBRBICLUSCEPF
Revenue $111.41M – –
Gross profit $108.73M – –
Operating income $1.87B -$50.23K -$440.90K
Net income $29.92M -$6.98K $10.08M
Free cash flow -$22.82M – –
EPS (diluted) – $0.00 $0.18
Cash & equivalents $37.78M – $25.00K
Total debt $322.82M – –
Shares (diluted) – 40.00M 57.15M
Enterprise value $619.50M $8.00B $463.50M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBRBICLUSCEPF
P/E 108.8x -1,146,093x 46.0x
P/FCF -143.5x – –
P/Operating cash flow -143.7x – –
P/S 29.4x – –
P/B 21.0x -105,257x -2,717x
P/Tangible book 21.0x -105,257x -2,717x
EV/EBITDA 1.4x – –
EV/EBIT 1.4x -159,282x -1,052x
EV/Revenue 23.9x – –
EV/FCF -116.6x – –
EV/Operating cash flow -116.8x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBRBICLUSCEPF
Revenue growth (1Y) 4.4% – –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 4.4% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 95.9% -16.4% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) -4.9% 83.8% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) – – –
EPS growth (1Y) – 98.0% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 84.3% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 84.3% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBRBICLUSCEPF
Gross margin 97.6% – –
EBITDA margin 1,679% – –
Operating margin 1,678% – –
Pretax margin 33.8% – –
Net margin 27.0% – –
FCF margin -20.5% – –
Operating cash flow margin -20.5% – –
Return on equity 21.3% – –
Return on assets 0.9% – 2.2%
Return on invested capital 703.2% – –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.0x – –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.8x – –
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBRBICLUSCEPF
Debt / assets 0.0% – 0.1%
Debt / equity 0.0x – -1.8x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.3x – –
Debt / FCF 0.0x – –
Liabilities / assets 95.6% – 100.0%
Equity / assets 4.4% – 0.0%
Interest coverage 4.9x – –
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBRBICLUSCEPF
Dividend yield 10.0% – –
Net buyback yield -0.7% – –
Shareholder yield 9.3% – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBRBICLUSCEPF

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBRBICLUSCEPF
Held by institutions – – 89.9%
Institutions holding – – 91
Change in shares held, QoQ – – -2.6%
Institutions buying – – 24
Institutions selling – – 10
Buyers to sellers – – 2.40

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BRBICLUSCEPF
BRBI 1.00 – -0.01
CLUS – – –
CEPF -0.01 – 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BRBI, CLUS and CEPF?

Cluster Group Holdings (CLUS) is the largest by market capitalisation: BRBI BR Partners (BRBI) $2.96B, Cluster Group Holdings (CLUS) $8.00B, Cantor Equity Partners IV (CEPF) $463.50M.

Which stock is cheaper, BRBI, CLUS and CEPF?

Cantor Equity Partners IV (CEPF) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (BRBI BR Partners (BRBI) 98.4x, Cluster Group Holdings (CLUS) -1,146,093x, Cantor Equity Partners IV (CEPF) 46.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Cluster Group Holdings (CLUS) returned the most: BRBI BR Partners (BRBI) -27.7%, Cluster Group Holdings (CLUS) 0.0%, Cantor Equity Partners IV (CEPF) -2.2%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Cluster Group Holdings (CLUS) has been the steadiest (BRBI BR Partners (BRBI) 78.0%, Cluster Group Holdings (CLUS) 0.0%, Cantor Equity Partners IV (CEPF) 4.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BRBI, CLUS and CEPF?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Cluster Group Holdings (CLUS) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.