BPYPP vs FRT vs SKT Stock Comparison

Brookfield Property Partners, Federal Realty Investment Trust and Tanger Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
SKT Tanger Inc.
$36.65 +5.5% 1M +9.4% 1Y
Market cap
$4.21B
P/E
17.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$612.31M
Div. yield
3.29%
Retail REITs Real Estate
7 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Tanger leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Tanger 7, Brookfield Property Partners 3, Federal Realty Investment Trust 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBPYPPFRTSKTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $14.33B $9.53B $4.21B BPYPP
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -56.2x 22.1x 17.0x SKT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 11.2x 25.0x 33.3x BPYPP
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -9.5% +8.0% +11.4% SKT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -3.6% 32.1% 40.3% SKT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 0.0% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 6.9x 4.5x 3.1x SKT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 10.94% 4.15% 3.29% BPYPP
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -1.7% +8.6% +9.4% SKT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -10.2%/yr -1.9%/yr +16.8%/yr SKT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 21.1% 16.9% 21.0% FRT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 52/100 42/100 62/100 SKT

Percentile Scorecard

BPYPPFRTSKT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBPYPPFRTSKT
Valuation 92 #13 of 145 14 #125 of 145 70 #44 of 145
Growth 66 #48 of 141 47 #75 of 141 80 #29 of 141
Profitability 19 #109 of 134 83 #24 of 134 98 #4 of 134
Financial Health 52 #67 of 138 45 #76 of 138 48 #72 of 138
Shareholder Returns 30 #92 of 131 20 #105 of 131 12 #115 of 131
Overall 52 42 62
  • BPYPP ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • FRT ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • SKT ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBPYPPFRTSKTSPY
1 month -0.7%-0.7%+5.5% -0.2%
3 months -5.4%-13.1%-12.9% +3.9%
6 months -7.9%-2.4%-0.8% +8.2%
Year to date +2.4%+8.8%+9.8% +12.9%
1 year -1.7%+8.6%+9.4% +12.3%
3 years +30.0%+26.6%+69.0% +87.4%
3 years, per year +9.1%+8.2%+19.1% +23.3%
5 years -41.7%-9.2%+116.9% +67.9%
5 years, per year -10.2%-1.9%+16.8% +10.9%
10 years —-23.4%+7.1% +261.1%
10 years, per year —-2.6%+0.7% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureBPYPPFRTSKTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 21.1%16.9%21.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 19.9%16.3%19.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.400.110.24 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.080.510.45 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -56.4%-40.0%-36.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -10.5%-13.7%-12.9% -1.2%
52-week high $16.70$127.13$42.10 $779.14
52-week low $14.38$94.87$31.63 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBPYPPFRTSKT
P/E now vs peer median -56.2xmedian 26.3x 22.1xmedian 26.3x 17.0xmedian 26.3x
P/S now vs peer median 2.0xmedian 4.0x 7.1xmedian 4.0x 6.9xmedian 4.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 10.5xmedian 14.4x 13.8xmedian 14.4x 12.2xmedian 14.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 23.3x -25.7xmedian 23.3x 13.0xmedian 23.3x
P/B now vs peer median 0.3xmedian 1.3x 2.8xmedian 1.3x 6.0xmedian 1.3x
PEG now vs peer median -1.36median 1.91 10.76median 1.91 1.94median 1.91

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBPYPPFRTSKT
Revenue $7.17B $1.34B $612.31M
Operating income – $638.97M –
Net income -$113.00M $446.74M $246.96M
Free cash flow – -$371.04M $323.28M
EPS (diluted) $-0.27 $4.97 $2.13
Cash & equivalents $1.49B $107.25M $176.88M
Total debt $28.73B $19.28B $1.62B
Shares (diluted) 960.29M 86.18M 115.73M
Enterprise value $15.67B $9.27B $3.78B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBPYPPFRTSKT
P/E -56.2x 22.1x 17.0x
P/FCF – -25.7x 13.0x
P/Operating cash flow – 15.1x 7.1x
P/S 2.0x 7.1x 6.9x
P/B 0.3x 2.8x 6.0x
P/Tangible book 0.3x 2.8x 6.0x
EV/EBITDA 10.5x 13.8x 12.2x
EV/EBIT 11.5x 22.2x 19.1x
EV/Revenue 5.8x 10.6x 9.2x
EV/FCF – -38.2x 17.4x
EV/Operating cash flow – 22.5x 9.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -1.36 10.76 1.94

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBPYPPFRTSKT
Revenue growth (1Y) -9.5% 8.0% 11.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -4.1% 6.4% 11.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – 21.5% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 5.5% –
Net income growth (1Y) 83.2% 24.7% 21.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 62.1% 4.0% 12.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 63.1% 27.3% 19.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 41.4% 2.1% 8.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 6.3% 10.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 4.8% 10.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -323.9% 63.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -17.8% 10.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBPYPPFRTSKT
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin 55.0% 77.2% 75.4%
Operating margin – 47.9% –
Pretax margin 2.7% 33.4% 36.4%
Net margin -3.6% 32.1% 40.3%
FCF margin – -27.8% 52.8%
Operating cash flow margin – 47.3% 97.5%
Return on equity -0.3% 13.1% 18.9%
Return on assets -0.1% 4.9% 4.6%
Return on invested capital 0.0% – –
Return on capital employed 4.1% – –
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.1x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.4x 2.4x
Stock comp / revenue – 1.1% 4.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBPYPPFRTSKT
Debt / assets 28.1% 52.6% 56.6%
Debt / equity 0.7x 1.4x 2.3x
Net debt / EBITDA 6.9x 4.5x 3.1x
Debt / FCF – -12.9x 5.0x
Liabilities / assets 58.3% 62.1% 75.5%
Equity / assets 41.7% 37.9% 24.5%
Interest coverage 1.1x 3.3x 4.1x
Current ratio 0.3x – –
Quick ratio 0.3x – –
Cash ratio 0.1x – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBPYPPFRTSKT
Dividend yield 10.9% 4.1% 3.3%
Net buyback yield -10.3% -0.6% -1.2%
Shareholder yield 0.7% 3.5% 2.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBPYPPFRTSKT
Forward P/E 11.2xFY2023 25.0xFY2026 33.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.34FY2023 $4.38FY2026 $1.10FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -6.4%FY2026 +11.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – -31.5% +10.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $7.07BFY2023 $1.28BFY2026 $638.63MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +2.5%FY2026 +15.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +14.8% -9.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBPYPPFRTSKT
Held by institutions – 98.5% 93.8%
Institutions holding – 621 361
Change in shares held, QoQ – +9.4% +2.8%
Institutions buying – 363 172
Institutions selling – 162 122
Buyers to sellers – 2.24 1.41

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BPYPPFRTSKT
BPYPP 1.00 0.09 0.07
FRT 0.09 1.00 0.64
SKT 0.07 0.64 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BPYPP, FRT and SKT?

Brookfield Property Partners (BPYPP) is the largest by market capitalisation: Brookfield Property Partners (BPYPP) $14.33B, Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) $9.53B, Tanger (SKT) $4.21B.

Which stock is cheaper, BPYPP, FRT and SKT?

Tanger (SKT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Brookfield Property Partners (BPYPP) -56.2x, Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) 22.1x, Tanger (SKT) 17.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Brookfield Property Partners (BPYPP) is cheapest (Brookfield Property Partners (BPYPP) 11.2x, Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) 25.0x, Tanger (SKT) 33.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Tanger (SKT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Brookfield Property Partners (BPYPP) -9.5%, Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) +8.0%, Tanger (SKT) +11.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Tanger (SKT) has the highest net margin (Brookfield Property Partners (BPYPP) -3.6%, Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) 32.1%, Tanger (SKT) 40.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Tanger (SKT) returned the most: Brookfield Property Partners (BPYPP) -1.7%, Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) +8.6%, Tanger (SKT) +9.4%. Over five years, Tanger (SKT) compounded fastest (Brookfield Property Partners (BPYPP) -10.2%/yr, Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) -1.9%/yr, Tanger (SKT) +16.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Brookfield Property Partners (BPYPP) has the highest dividend yield: Brookfield Property Partners (BPYPP) 10.94%, Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) 4.15%, Tanger (SKT) 3.29%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) has been the steadiest (Brookfield Property Partners (BPYPP) 21.1%, Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) 16.9%, Tanger (SKT) 21.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BPYPP, FRT and SKT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Tanger (SKT) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.