BN vs OAK-PA Stock Comparison

Brookfield and Brookfield Oaktree Holdings Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BN BROOKFIELD Corp /ON/
$37.95 +2.9% 1M -17.8% 1Y
Market cap
$85.56B
P/E
68.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$76.56B
Div. yield
–
Alternative Asset Managers Financial Services
2 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Brookfield Oaktree Holdings leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Brookfield Oaktree Holdings 6, Brookfield 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBNOAK-PALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $85.56B $2.36B BN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 68.1x 7.9x OAK-PA
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 13.7x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -9.6% -2.3% OAK-PA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 1.6% 48.6% OAK-PA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.07% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -17.8% -9.9% OAK-PA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +3.0%/yr -5.7%/yr BN
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 27.7% 14.5% OAK-PA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 38/100 42/100 OAK-PA

Percentile Scorecard

BNOAK-PA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBNOAK-PA
Valuation 77 #44 of 184 37 #116 of 184
Growth 33 #76 of 113 62 #44 of 113
Profitability 30 #91 of 130 50 #66 of 130
Financial Health 39 #102 of 167 45 #93 of 167
Shareholder Returns 13 #66 of 76 15 #65 of 76
Overall 38 42
  • BN ranked among 212 companies in Asset and Wealth Management
  • OAK-PA ranked among 212 companies in Asset and Wealth Management

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBNOAK-PASPY
1 month +2.9%-3.6% -0.8%
3 months -9.8%-5.0% +3.5%
6 months -15.3%-4.3% +7.0%
Year to date -17.3%-4.9% +12.2%
1 year -17.8%-9.9% +13.0%
3 years +95.3%+2.0% +86.3%
3 years, per year +25.0%+0.7% +23.1%
5 years +16.1%-25.3% +68.6%
5 years, per year +3.0%-5.7% +11.0%
10 years +200.7%— +258.0%
10 years, per year +11.6%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureBNOAK-PASPY
Volatility, 1Y 27.7%14.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 29.0%16.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.370.20 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.64-0.68 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -42.8%-28.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -22.8%-10.6% -1.8%
52-week high $49.17$22.31 $779.14
52-week low $35.94$19.95 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBNOAK-PA
P/E now vs peer median 67.9xmedian 33.6x 7.9xmedian 33.6x
P/S now vs peer median 1.1xmedian 4.9x 5.2xmedian 4.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 11.5x —median 11.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 13.2x -13.7xmedian 13.2x
P/B now vs peer median 20.9xmedian 1.8x 1.6xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median -0.71median 0.91 0.35median 0.91

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBNOAK-PA
Revenue $76.56B $617.93M
Net income $3.71B $716.53M
Free cash flow – -$233.55M
EPS (diluted) $0.53 $2.53
Cash & equivalents $14.89B $255.46M
Total debt $59.07B $4.99B
Shares (diluted) 2.37B 118.83M
Enterprise value -$97.76B $1.32B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBNOAK-PA
P/E 67.9x 7.9x
P/FCF – -13.7x
P/Operating cash flow – -13.7x
P/S 1.1x 5.2x
P/B 20.9x 1.6x
P/Tangible book -2.6x 1.6x
EV/EBITDA – –
EV/EBIT – –
EV/Revenue 0.7x 7.2x
EV/FCF – -19.0x
EV/Operating cash flow – -19.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.71 0.35

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBNOAK-PA
Revenue growth (1Y) -9.6% -2.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -4.2% -14.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – –
Net income growth (1Y) 28.4% 44.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 11.2% 9.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 65.8% 140.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -95.3% 22.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -130.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 43.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -130.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 43.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBNOAK-PA
Gross margin – –
EBITDA margin – –
Operating margin – –
Pretax margin – –
Net margin 1.6% 48.6%
FCF margin – -37.8%
Operating cash flow margin – -37.8%
Return on equity 4.3% 32.5%
Return on assets 0.7% 10.0%
Return on invested capital – –
Return on capital employed – –
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – -0.3x
Stock comp / revenue – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBNOAK-PA
Debt / assets 2.8% 21.2%
Debt / equity 3.6x 0.7x
Net debt / EBITDA – –
Debt / FCF – -6.4x
Liabilities / assets 99.2% 70.9%
Equity / assets 0.8% 29.1%
Interest coverage – –
Current ratio – –
Quick ratio – –
Cash ratio – –
Altman Z-score – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBNOAK-PA
Dividend yield 0.7% 0.0%
Net buyback yield – –
Shareholder yield 0.7% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 22.5%
Payout ratio (FCF) – -68.9%
Dividend growth (1Y) – -68.0%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 3.0%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBNOAK-PA
Forward P/E 13.7xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $2.78FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY +23.6%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +12.6% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $7.00BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +2.4%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +21.1% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBNOAK-PA
Held by institutions 66.5% –
Institutions holding 930 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.2% –
Institutions buying 407 –
Institutions selling 317 –
Buyers to sellers 1.28 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BNOAK-PA
BN 1.00 0.17
OAK-PA 0.17 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BN and OAK-PA?

Brookfield (BN) is the largest by market capitalisation: Brookfield (BN) $85.56B, Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) $2.36B.

Which stock is cheaper, BN and OAK-PA?

Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Brookfield (BN) 68.1x, Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) 7.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Brookfield (BN) -9.6%, Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) -2.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) has the highest net margin (Brookfield (BN) 1.6%, Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) 48.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) returned the most: Brookfield (BN) -17.8%, Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) -9.9%. Over five years, Brookfield (BN) compounded fastest (Brookfield (BN) +3.0%/yr, Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) -5.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Brookfield (BN) 0.00%, Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) 0.07%. Brookfield (BN) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) has been the steadiest (Brookfield (BN) 27.7%, Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) 14.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do BN and OAK-PA move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.17, a weak relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, BN and OAK-PA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.